<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Ardbeg Ten (2006)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.whiskynotes.be/2009/ardbeg/ardbeg-10y/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.whiskynotes.be/2009/ardbeg/ardbeg-10y/</link>
	<description>Whisky blog and tasting notes</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 14:18:41 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ardbeg 10yo Ten (2011) &#124; WhiskyNotes</title>
		<link>http://www.whiskynotes.be/2009/ardbeg/ardbeg-10y/comment-page-1/#comment-5123</link>
		<dc:creator>Ardbeg 10yo Ten (2011) &#124; WhiskyNotes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Jun 2011 03:08:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.whiskynotes.be/?p=1044#comment-5123</guid>
		<description>[...] it’s good to revisit well known whiskies such as Ardbeg Ten. It comes in batches so its profile can change slightly over time. Recently I tried a new batch of [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] it’s good to revisit well known whiskies such as Ardbeg Ten. It comes in batches so its profile can change slightly over time. Recently I tried a new batch of [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Best in Blog #5: Tasting Notes and Whisky News on the Web &#124; Whisky Party</title>
		<link>http://www.whiskynotes.be/2009/ardbeg/ardbeg-10y/comment-page-1/#comment-187</link>
		<dc:creator>Best in Blog #5: Tasting Notes and Whisky News on the Web &#124; Whisky Party</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 May 2009 18:16:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.whiskynotes.be/?p=1044#comment-187</guid>
		<description>[...] Whisky Notes revisits the Ardbeg 10 and comes away with a more favorable impression than in previous tastings. For my money, he is still undervaluing this excellent dram. He also tries a dram of a Rare Malts St. Magdalene 1970 23 year. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Whisky Notes revisits the Ardbeg 10 and comes away with a more favorable impression than in previous tastings. For my money, he is still undervaluing this excellent dram. He also tries a dram of a Rare Malts St. Magdalene 1970 23 year. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

