<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Ardbeg 1998 (Cask 1190)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.whiskynotes.be/2009/ardbeg/ardbeg-1998-cask-1190/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.whiskynotes.be/2009/ardbeg/ardbeg-1998-cask-1190/</link>
	<description>Whisky blog and tasting notes</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 14:18:41 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ardbeg Alligator (Committee release) &#124; WhiskyNotes</title>
		<link>http://www.whiskynotes.be/2009/ardbeg/ardbeg-1998-cask-1190/comment-page-1/#comment-5142</link>
		<dc:creator>Ardbeg Alligator (Committee release) &#124; WhiskyNotes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Jun 2011 23:03:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.whiskynotes.be/?p=1607#comment-5142</guid>
		<description>[...] darker, warmer and sweeter than Ardbeg 10. Not quite what I hoped for based on cask #1189 and #1190 but then again these casks had a different treatment. I like the result, but the complexity seems a [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] darker, warmer and sweeter than Ardbeg 10. Not quite what I hoped for based on cask #1189 and #1190 but then again these casks had a different treatment. I like the result, but the complexity seems a [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ardbeg Alligator &#187; All Things Whisky</title>
		<link>http://www.whiskynotes.be/2009/ardbeg/ardbeg-1998-cask-1190/comment-page-1/#comment-4300</link>
		<dc:creator>Ardbeg Alligator &#187; All Things Whisky</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Feb 2011 00:32:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.whiskynotes.be/?p=1607#comment-4300</guid>
		<description>[...] Ardbeg did some experiments with heavily charred new oak casks and released two of them for Feis Ile 2009: Ardbeg 1998 cask 1189 and Ardbeg 1998 cask 1190.  [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Ardbeg did some experiments with heavily charred new oak casks and released two of them for Feis Ile 2009: Ardbeg 1998 cask 1189 and Ardbeg 1998 cask 1190.  [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ardbeg Alligator &#124; WhiskyNotes</title>
		<link>http://www.whiskynotes.be/2009/ardbeg/ardbeg-1998-cask-1190/comment-page-1/#comment-4087</link>
		<dc:creator>Ardbeg Alligator &#124; WhiskyNotes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Jan 2011 18:24:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.whiskynotes.be/?p=1607#comment-4087</guid>
		<description>[...] Ardbeg did some experiments with heavily charred new oak casks and released two of those casks for Feis Ile 2009: Ardbeg 1998 cask 1189 and Ardbeg 1998 cask 1190. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Ardbeg did some experiments with heavily charred new oak casks and released two of those casks for Feis Ile 2009: Ardbeg 1998 cask 1189 and Ardbeg 1998 cask 1190. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: &#187; Ardbeg 1998 (Cask 1189) &#8250; WhiskyNotes</title>
		<link>http://www.whiskynotes.be/2009/ardbeg/ardbeg-1998-cask-1190/comment-page-1/#comment-278</link>
		<dc:creator>&#187; Ardbeg 1998 (Cask 1189) &#8250; WhiskyNotes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Jun 2009 22:27:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.whiskynotes.be/?p=1607#comment-278</guid>
		<description>[...] is the sister cask of the Ardbeg 1998 cask 1190 that I reviewed yesterday. Both are matured for 10 years in new, toasted oak hogsheads that are [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] is the sister cask of the Ardbeg 1998 cask 1190 that I reviewed yesterday. Both are matured for 10 years in new, toasted oak hogsheads that are [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ruben</title>
		<link>http://www.whiskynotes.be/2009/ardbeg/ardbeg-1998-cask-1190/comment-page-1/#comment-271</link>
		<dc:creator>Ruben</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Jun 2009 12:47:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.whiskynotes.be/?p=1607#comment-271</guid>
		<description>That one&#039;s coming tomorrow ;-) While I agree it&#039;s better, I don&#039;t find the difference that huge.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That one&#8217;s coming tomorrow <img src='http://www.whiskynotes.be/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' />  While I agree it&#8217;s better, I don&#8217;t find the difference that huge.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tim F</title>
		<link>http://www.whiskynotes.be/2009/ardbeg/ardbeg-1998-cask-1190/comment-page-1/#comment-270</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim F</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Jun 2009 12:32:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.whiskynotes.be/?p=1607#comment-270</guid>
		<description>Bloody good whisky, but the 1189 just shades it for me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bloody good whisky, but the 1189 just shades it for me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jorgen</title>
		<link>http://www.whiskynotes.be/2009/ardbeg/ardbeg-1998-cask-1190/comment-page-1/#comment-269</link>
		<dc:creator>Jorgen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Jun 2009 08:46:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.whiskynotes.be/?p=1607#comment-269</guid>
		<description>Sounds nice!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sounds nice!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

