<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: BenRiach 1976 (cask 3558 &#8211; The Whisky Fair)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.whiskynotes.be/2009/benriach/benriach-1976-3558-whisky-fair/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.whiskynotes.be/2009/benriach/benriach-1976-3558-whisky-fair/</link>
	<description>Whisky blog and tasting notes</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 14:18:41 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Best in Blog #33: Manager's Choice Single Cask Edition &#124; Whisky Party</title>
		<link>http://www.whiskynotes.be/2009/benriach/benriach-1976-3558-whisky-fair/comment-page-1/#comment-1543</link>
		<dc:creator>Best in Blog #33: Manager's Choice Single Cask Edition &#124; Whisky Party</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Jan 2010 02:19:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.whiskynotes.be/?p=2090#comment-1543</guid>
		<description>[...] Notes tries Arran Peacock, as well as two single casks of Ben Riach [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Notes tries Arran Peacock, as well as two single casks of Ben Riach [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Luc Timmermans</title>
		<link>http://www.whiskynotes.be/2009/benriach/benriach-1976-3558-whisky-fair/comment-page-1/#comment-702</link>
		<dc:creator>Luc Timmermans</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Sep 2009 09:31:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.whiskynotes.be/?p=2090#comment-702</guid>
		<description>Yes, I totally agree.  Both casks are wonderfull. The 3550 is more to my &quot;daily&quot; liking as well. More fruit...and mellower because of the missing woodspices in this one. The 3558 is perhaps a bit more robust and a bit rougher.  Surely a fine dram....both are in fact great.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, I totally agree.  Both casks are wonderfull. The 3550 is more to my &#8220;daily&#8221; liking as well. More fruit&#8230;and mellower because of the missing woodspices in this one. The 3558 is perhaps a bit more robust and a bit rougher.  Surely a fine dram&#8230;.both are in fact great.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Johan</title>
		<link>http://www.whiskynotes.be/2009/benriach/benriach-1976-3558-whisky-fair/comment-page-1/#comment-701</link>
		<dc:creator>Johan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Sep 2009 10:10:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.whiskynotes.be/?p=2090#comment-701</guid>
		<description>Ok, the answer is ‘yes’ :-)
I understand why you like cask 3558 a little more, it are indeed different whiskies (hurray to maturation!) and have both their own - and great - qualities. It’s just what appeals to you more. Les goûts et les couleurs… For me, the pure fruitiness of 3550 gave it a (very small) benefit over cask 3558, resulting in an opposite scoring. But I can imagine that in another time and place, it could be the other way round.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ok, the answer is ‘yes’ <img src='http://www.whiskynotes.be/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /><br />
I understand why you like cask 3558 a little more, it are indeed different whiskies (hurray to maturation!) and have both their own &#8211; and great &#8211; qualities. It’s just what appeals to you more. Les goûts et les couleurs… For me, the pure fruitiness of 3550 gave it a (very small) benefit over cask 3558, resulting in an opposite scoring. But I can imagine that in another time and place, it could be the other way round.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

