<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Caperdonich 1972 (cask 7449)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.whiskynotes.be/2009/caperdonich/caperdonich-1972-cask-7449/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.whiskynotes.be/2009/caperdonich/caperdonich-1972-cask-7449/</link>
	<description>Whisky blog and tasting notes</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 14:18:41 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Caperdonich 1968 (G&#38;M) &#124; WhiskyNotes</title>
		<link>http://www.whiskynotes.be/2009/caperdonich/caperdonich-1972-cask-7449/comment-page-1/#comment-2858</link>
		<dc:creator>Caperdonich 1968 (G&#38;M) &#124; WhiskyNotes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Aug 2010 08:49:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.whiskynotes.be/?p=2291#comment-2858</guid>
		<description>[...] getting too oaky. It’s clear that 1968/1969 Caperdonich is different from the highly praised 1972 versions, even when bottled at a younger age. Both periods are great, the older stuff being less tropical [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] getting too oaky. It’s clear that 1968/1969 Caperdonich is different from the highly praised 1972 versions, even when bottled at a younger age. Both periods are great, the older stuff being less tropical [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Duncan Taylor &#124; The Aspiring Gentleman</title>
		<link>http://www.whiskynotes.be/2009/caperdonich/caperdonich-1972-cask-7449/comment-page-1/#comment-2430</link>
		<dc:creator>Duncan Taylor &#124; The Aspiring Gentleman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 May 2010 17:14:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.whiskynotes.be/?p=2291#comment-2430</guid>
		<description>[...] the next week. To give you a hint of what to expect, check some outside reviews for Macallan 1969, Caperdonich 1972, Royal Lochnagar 1990 and Strathclyde 1980. A common note for Duncan Taylor bottled whiskies is [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] the next week. To give you a hint of what to expect, check some outside reviews for Macallan 1969, Caperdonich 1972, Royal Lochnagar 1990 and Strathclyde 1980. A common note for Duncan Taylor bottled whiskies is [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: fonswonderspons</title>
		<link>http://www.whiskynotes.be/2009/caperdonich/caperdonich-1972-cask-7449/comment-page-1/#comment-751</link>
		<dc:creator>fonswonderspons</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Sep 2009 09:49:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.whiskynotes.be/?p=2291#comment-751</guid>
		<description>i&#039;d like to taste this one... i&#039;ve only tasted one of thes caperdonichs and it was very nice indeed... :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i&#8217;d like to taste this one&#8230; i&#8217;ve only tasted one of thes caperdonichs and it was very nice indeed&#8230; <img src='http://www.whiskynotes.be/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

