<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Glenfarclas 1968 (Lindores cask 699)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.whiskynotes.be/2009/glenfarclas/glenfarclas-1968-lindores-699/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.whiskynotes.be/2009/glenfarclas/glenfarclas-1968-lindores-699/</link>
	<description>Whisky blog and tasting notes</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 07:54:24 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Glenfarclas 1968 (cask #697) &#124; WhiskyNotes</title>
		<link>http://www.whiskynotes.be/2009/glenfarclas/glenfarclas-1968-lindores-699/comment-page-1/#comment-5394</link>
		<dc:creator>Glenfarclas 1968 (cask #697) &#124; WhiskyNotes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Aug 2011 05:49:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.whiskynotes.be/?p=2395#comment-5394</guid>
		<description>[...] Glenfarclas 1968 cask #697 was selected by Luc Timmermans who previously selected cask #699 (Fino) and #702 / #5240 (Oloroso + Fino). All of these are 1968 casks of which he has been [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Glenfarclas 1968 cask #697 was selected by Luc Timmermans who previously selected cask #699 (Fino) and #702 / #5240 (Oloroso + Fino). All of these are 1968 casks of which he has been [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Glenfarclas 1968 (#5240 + #702 for Thosop) &#124; WhiskyNotes</title>
		<link>http://www.whiskynotes.be/2009/glenfarclas/glenfarclas-1968-lindores-699/comment-page-1/#comment-2786</link>
		<dc:creator>Glenfarclas 1968 (#5240 + #702 for Thosop) &#124; WhiskyNotes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Aug 2010 05:42:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.whiskynotes.be/?p=2395#comment-2786</guid>
		<description>[...] poured me a dram from a sample bottle and told me it would be the successor of his rather legendary Glenfarclas 1968 cask #699, bottled last year. Again, it was quite clear that this was another great Glenfarclas, albeit with [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] poured me a dram from a sample bottle and told me it would be the successor of his rather legendary Glenfarclas 1968 cask #699, bottled last year. Again, it was quite clear that this was another great Glenfarclas, albeit with [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The new Glenfarclas 1968 &#124; WhiskyNotes</title>
		<link>http://www.whiskynotes.be/2009/glenfarclas/glenfarclas-1968-lindores-699/comment-page-1/#comment-2734</link>
		<dc:creator>The new Glenfarclas 1968 &#124; WhiskyNotes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Aug 2010 18:10:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.whiskynotes.be/?p=2395#comment-2734</guid>
		<description>[...] year, a cask of Glenfarclas 1968 was selected by collector Luc Timmermans to celebrate a couple of anniversaries (of his club [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] year, a cask of Glenfarclas 1968 was selected by collector Luc Timmermans to celebrate a couple of anniversaries (of his club [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Charlie</title>
		<link>http://www.whiskynotes.be/2009/glenfarclas/glenfarclas-1968-lindores-699/comment-page-1/#comment-1932</link>
		<dc:creator>Charlie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Mar 2010 02:14:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.whiskynotes.be/?p=2395#comment-1932</guid>
		<description>I have received my bottle of this Glenfarclas 1968. It is quite interesting to note that the color of it is lighter than the Glenfarclas 1968 65.1% (released in 2007).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have received my bottle of this Glenfarclas 1968. It is quite interesting to note that the color of it is lighter than the Glenfarclas 1968 65.1% (released in 2007).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ruben</title>
		<link>http://www.whiskynotes.be/2009/glenfarclas/glenfarclas-1968-lindores-699/comment-page-1/#comment-1834</link>
		<dc:creator>Ruben</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Feb 2010 12:16:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.whiskynotes.be/?p=2395#comment-1834</guid>
		<description>You&#039;re right, Luc decided that the wooden box only adds up to the price.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You&#8217;re right, Luc decided that the wooden box only adds up to the price.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Charlie</title>
		<link>http://www.whiskynotes.be/2009/glenfarclas/glenfarclas-1968-lindores-699/comment-page-1/#comment-1833</link>
		<dc:creator>Charlie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Feb 2010 12:02:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.whiskynotes.be/?p=2395#comment-1833</guid>
		<description>I noticed that this Glenfarclas 1968 does not come with the standard wooden box.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I noticed that this Glenfarclas 1968 does not come with the standard wooden box.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: &#187; Whiskysamples +1 &#8250; WhiskyNotes</title>
		<link>http://www.whiskynotes.be/2009/glenfarclas/glenfarclas-1968-lindores-699/comment-page-1/#comment-894</link>
		<dc:creator>&#187; Whiskysamples +1 &#8250; WhiskyNotes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Nov 2009 14:42:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.whiskynotes.be/?p=2395#comment-894</guid>
		<description>[...] samples from 200 to 250. Great! In the meantime, Whiskysamples released 60 relabeled bottles of the Glenfarclas 1968 / 2009 Family Cask #699.    Tags: Glenfarclas, luc timmermans, whisky [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] samples from 200 to 250. Great! In the meantime, Whiskysamples released 60 relabeled bottles of the Glenfarclas 1968 / 2009 Family Cask #699.    Tags: Glenfarclas, luc timmermans, whisky [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ALouis</title>
		<link>http://www.whiskynotes.be/2009/glenfarclas/glenfarclas-1968-lindores-699/comment-page-1/#comment-826</link>
		<dc:creator>ALouis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Oct 2009 16:12:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.whiskynotes.be/?p=2395#comment-826</guid>
		<description>Less woody than Glendronach ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Less woody than Glendronach <img src='http://www.whiskynotes.be/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ruben</title>
		<link>http://www.whiskynotes.be/2009/glenfarclas/glenfarclas-1968-lindores-699/comment-page-1/#comment-825</link>
		<dc:creator>Ruben</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Oct 2009 08:57:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.whiskynotes.be/?p=2395#comment-825</guid>
		<description>For me, 94 is not &quot;far better&quot; than 93, Anthony, it&#039;s more or less &quot;equally wonderful&quot;... The Glenfarclas has an excellent nose but a slightly woody palate in my opinion.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For me, 94 is not &#8220;far better&#8221; than 93, Anthony, it&#8217;s more or less &#8220;equally wonderful&#8221;&#8230; The Glenfarclas has an excellent nose but a slightly woody palate in my opinion.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ALouis</title>
		<link>http://www.whiskynotes.be/2009/glenfarclas/glenfarclas-1968-lindores-699/comment-page-1/#comment-824</link>
		<dc:creator>ALouis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Oct 2009 07:04:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.whiskynotes.be/?p=2395#comment-824</guid>
		<description>Je suis surpris de ta note Ruben.
Tu le notes moins bien que le Glendronach 72?
Pour moi ce serait plutôt l&#039;inverse, et de loin.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Je suis surpris de ta note Ruben.<br />
Tu le notes moins bien que le Glendronach 72?<br />
Pour moi ce serait plutôt l&#8217;inverse, et de loin.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

