Single malt whisky - tasting notes

08 Jun 2009

Springbank 21 years

Posted by: Ruben In: Springbank

Springbank claims to be the only distillery that performs the complete production process in its own facilities — including floor malting, maturation, and bottling.

There are many versions of this rather legendary Springbank 21yo. They were bottled in dumpy bottles during the 1980’s. After that, regular bottles appeared with a cardboard box and slightly different printing, first with a jagged label and then with a straight cut label. In 2005, the last batch was released (2400 bottles).


Springbank 21yo Springbank 21y (46%, OB mid 90’s, jagged label)

Nose: wow, one of the most impressive noses I’ve come across. Dry fruits (plums, apricot). A strong whiff of heather. Wonderful notes of old wood, dusty cellars. Just the right amount of sherry influence. Something of biscuits and sweet honey. Coconut? Cherries? Blueberries? Waxy notes as well and even a slight coastal edge. Hints of leather. Oh man, I could go on and on… Complex but so smoothly balanced. Mouth: liquid velvet. Fruity start, candied even. Developing on raisins and cassis. Heathered honey again. Growing spicier (cinnamon, vanilla) and oakier. Very nice touching of coal smoke, but really subtle. Salty liquorice towards the end. Finish: very long, regaining raisin sweetness.

Really excellent, although it’s a tad more spectacular on the nose than on the palate. This is high class. If you find a bottle of this Springbank, expect to pay around € 350.

Score: 94/100

 

This was post n°100 on WhiskyNotes (hooray), so it had to be something special, right?

Springbank 21 years 5 Ruben [WhiskyNotes] 2009-06-08">

13 Responses to "Springbank 21 years"

1 | Best in Blog #8: Tasting Notes and Whisky News on the Web | Whisky Party

June 8th, 2009 at 05:45

Avatar

[...] Notes gives high grades to a Springbank 21 year, and somewhat lower grades to a 1979 vintage, 19 year old Lagavulin put out by Murray McDavid – a [...]

2 | Tim F

June 8th, 2009 at 18:49

Avatar

Congratulations, Ruben! You’ve got to 100 posts very quickly, you’re making me look bad :)

Well done, mate, it’s a great blog

3 | Ruben

June 9th, 2009 at 10:11

Avatar

Thanks Tim! Let’s hope I can keep up this pace. But after all, quality is more important than quantity.

4 | smsmmns

June 10th, 2009 at 18:41

Avatar

Who told you that rubbish? Quantity, QUANTITY!!!

5 | Ruben

June 10th, 2009 at 18:44

Avatar

I think I’ve read that rubbish somewhere. Wait a minute, wasn’t that on your blog, Doctor? ;-)

6 | Charlie

April 8th, 2010 at 09:24

Avatar

Was this Springbank 21 yo matured in the sherry cask?

7 | Ruben

April 8th, 2010 at 10:22

Avatar

Yes, refill sherry.

8 | Charlie

April 8th, 2010 at 14:11

Avatar

Thanks. I got it from a local collector here for about €220.

9 | Ruben

June 21st, 2010 at 10:08

Avatar

More than a year later, I have now found a bottle of this Springbank. Most of the bottles in rotation have a straight cut label, but I really wanted to find the version with the jagged parchment label that I loved so much. Hooray!

10 | Kenneth

September 30th, 2010 at 10:30

Avatar

Hi Ruben (and everyone else!)
I’m considering to buy a bottle of the newest batch – 2004 or 2005, I think.
Any notes on that one? Is it near the excellent one from the nineties? Or not worth the money (260 euro)?

11 | Paul

October 7th, 2010 at 23:19

Avatar

Kenneth – I’ve not tried the dumpy bottle of the 80′s, but for me the jagged parchment version from the mid 90′s is definitely better than the 2004/5 version. The latter is also a wonderful whisky; just lacked some of the smoothness and complexity of the former.

12 | Rannoch Moor

April 1st, 2011 at 16:14

Avatar

Ruben,

I just bought a bottle of this 21yo, how can I check if this is the version with the jagged parchment label . My bottle dates 25/08/00 and is quite dark in color.

Rannoch Moor

13 | Ruben

April 1st, 2011 at 17:33

Avatar

This is a jagged version: http://whiskyauction.com/auction/i/im1007big/10072599.jpg
In the other version, the edges of the label are straight, like this:
http://whiskyauction.com/auction/i/im1007big/10072605.jpg
Also the vertical lines are more pronounced, the colour of the S is white vs. paper, and the black capsule is different. The straight version is generally darker whisky.

Comment Form



Notifications


Categories

Calendar

February 2012
M T W T F S S
« Jan    
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
272829  

Coming up

  • Glenrothes 1970 (Angel's Choice)
  • Bruichladdich 1992 Micro Provenance
  • Ardmore 19yo 1992 (SMOS)
  • Yamazaki 1980 vintage
  • Amrut Intermediate Sherry
  • LMdW update

Over 900 notes by Ruben

WhiskyNotes - Ruben LuytenThis blog is my personal collection of impressions, written while searching for the ultimate single malt whisky.