1 | walter

August 15th, 2010 at 09:49

Wat gaan ze op het label vermelden?
Volgens de nieuwe Schotse rules , moet het in Schotland gebotteld zijn om Real Schotse whisky te mogen vermelden,zoals op de vorige editie?

2 | walter

August 15th, 2010 at 09:55

http://www.scotland.gov.uk/News/Releases/2009/11/20115822

3 | Ruben

August 16th, 2010 at 08:06

Until the end of 2012, there’s still a transition period so they don’t have to change the label yet. And even after 2012, it’s easy to overcome. If you can’t name it “Single Malt Scotch Whisky”, just name it “Single Malt Whisky – distilled in Scotland, bottled in Belgium”. This is not going to keep anyone from buying it.

4 | Jvdb

November 28th, 2010 at 23:30

De Bourbon 2002 Cask In a Van is goed. Heb er 2 gekocht. Maar de Sherry’s zijn much better.
Je mist wat Glendronach net zo speciaal maakt.

5 | GlenDronach 2002 (Cask in a Van 2010) | WhiskyNotes

June 16th, 2011 at 00:50

[...] has a yearly tradition of releasing a single cask for Belgium, bottled straight from the van. In September 2010, they selected a bourbon cask with a virgin oak finish – not an obvious choice [...]

6 | GlenDronach 2002 (Cask in a Van III) | WhiskyNotes

August 15th, 2011 at 00:31

[...] probably heard of the Cask in a van concept: fill your own bottle straight from a GlenDronach cask that’s transported all over Belgium. This [...]