<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Penderyn Madeira finish</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.whiskynotes.be/2010/world/penderyn-madeira-finish/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.whiskynotes.be/2010/world/penderyn-madeira-finish/</link>
	<description>Whisky blog and tasting notes</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 14:18:41 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tasting Notes &#38; Review: Penderyn Welsh Whisky &#124; Whisky Party</title>
		<link>http://www.whiskynotes.be/2010/world/penderyn-madeira-finish/comment-page-1/#comment-4187</link>
		<dc:creator>Tasting Notes &#38; Review: Penderyn Welsh Whisky &#124; Whisky Party</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Feb 2011 02:44:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.whiskynotes.be/?p=821#comment-4187</guid>
		<description>[...] Whisky Notes: &#8220;Well, I think this Penderyn would have been a lot worse without the Madeira finish, because underneath is basically rather immature whisky (probably around 4 or 5 years).&#8221; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Whisky Notes: &#8220;Well, I think this Penderyn would have been a lot worse without the Madeira finish, because underneath is basically rather immature whisky (probably around 4 or 5 years).&#8221; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Penderyn Sherrywood &#124; WhiskyNotes</title>
		<link>http://www.whiskynotes.be/2010/world/penderyn-madeira-finish/comment-page-1/#comment-1752</link>
		<dc:creator>Penderyn Sherrywood &#124; WhiskyNotes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Feb 2010 16:54:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.whiskynotes.be/?p=821#comment-1752</guid>
		<description>[...] the standard Penderyn Madeira, let’s compare it to a sherried version. It was finished in dry oloroso sherry [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] the standard Penderyn Madeira, let’s compare it to a sherried version. It was finished in dry oloroso sherry [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Best in Blog #69: Penderyn Invades the Blogs; Wrapping Up the Malt Advocate Awards &#124; Whisky Party</title>
		<link>http://www.whiskynotes.be/2010/world/penderyn-madeira-finish/comment-page-1/#comment-1747</link>
		<dc:creator>Best in Blog #69: Penderyn Invades the Blogs; Wrapping Up the Malt Advocate Awards &#124; Whisky Party</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Feb 2010 21:37:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.whiskynotes.be/?p=821#comment-1747</guid>
		<description>[...] Penderyn continues to garner lots of coverage in the blogosphere this week.  Whisky for Everyone reviews Penderyn Rich Madeira.  Whisky Host tries Aur Cymru (Welsh Gold). And Whisky Notes tries the regular Penderyn Madeira Finish. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Penderyn continues to garner lots of coverage in the blogosphere this week.  Whisky for Everyone reviews Penderyn Rich Madeira.  Whisky Host tries Aur Cymru (Welsh Gold). And Whisky Notes tries the regular Penderyn Madeira Finish. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gal Granov</title>
		<link>http://www.whiskynotes.be/2010/world/penderyn-madeira-finish/comment-page-1/#comment-1741</link>
		<dc:creator>Gal Granov</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Feb 2010 12:51:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.whiskynotes.be/?p=821#comment-1741</guid>
		<description>it&#039;s a nice whisky, melons galore ...
but young. we&#039;ve reviewed it also.
here : 
http://bit.ly/8Xk6L0</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>it&#8217;s a nice whisky, melons galore &#8230;<br />
but young. we&#8217;ve reviewed it also.<br />
here :<br />
<a href="http://bit.ly/8Xk6L0" rel="nofollow">http://bit.ly/8Xk6L0</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

