Single malt whisky - tasting notes

21 Sep 2011

Springbank 1992 Peat-smoked (BBR)

Posted by: Ruben Luyten In: Springbank

No need to tell you peat-smoked Springbank is actually the same as Longrow. But independent bottlers like Berry Bros & Rudd are not allowed to mention that on the label, so they have to call it peated Springbank.

This is the second peat-smoked Springbank from BBR, after sister cask #71 bottled in 2009.

 

Springbank 1992 peat-smokedSpringbank 1992 ‘Peat-smoked’
(46%, Berry Bros & Rudd 2011, cask #61)

Nose: smooth and subtly peated, quite oily with some medicinal elements as well as more aromatic, fruity notes. Tangerine, pear and melon, I would say. Quite coastal as well, with iodine, wet sand and chalk. Wet wool. A little eucalyptus. Graphite. Hints of sweet lemon. Very clean and finely chiselled but not too austere, with the soft peat completely mixed with the rounder elements. Not too far from the legendary 1970’s Ardbegs in that respect, which is quite an achievement. Mouth: also quite oily, with the same elements we saw on the nose. Again perfectly in the middle between austere and rounded. A soft bitterness, a soft sweetness and a soft peatiness, how’s that for balance? Fresh lemon. Mineral notes. Soft spices (pepper, ginger and a pinch of salt). Cold ashes. Finish: long and powerful, still mineral with some sweet lemon and soot.

In case you’ve missed cask #71, here’s a perfect replacement. Is it indecent to hope for a cask strength version one day? That could be out of this world. Around € 110.

Score: 90/100

Springbank 1992 Peat-smoked (BBR) 4 Ruben Luyten 2011-09-21
  • Stuart Robson

    Nice notes as always :-). I love this one, Longrow remains one of the most exciting makes for me. I look forward to many more in the future and like you say hopefully a few indi’s at CS.

  • Thomas

    Hi Ruben, I also like this one a lot… I was wondering if the mention “peat smoked” and naming it “Springbank” might also have another reason: Classical Springbank distillation is 2,5 (or more precise 2,8)-times distilled, while Longrow is 2-distilled. Do you know how this baby was distilled? Thanks,

    Thomas

  • Stuart Robson

    @Thomas. Jumping in here as I can confirm that the name is only applied here due to the reasons Ruben mentioned. It is indeed a Longrow :-)

  • Thomas

    @Stuart: Thanks Stuart for the info!!

    … and quite a reasonable price for a longrow of this age… :)

  • Stuart Robson

    @Thomas, indeed, one of the great things about Indi bottlers….as long as you have good friends with similar tastes to advise you :-). This one is a cracker…I think I liked it even more than Ruben.

Categories

Calendar

December 2014
M T W T F S S
« Nov    
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
293031  

  • SK: And just to prove a point, all of the bottles are still available in places where they usually run out. Lets see how many will be still available whe
  • SK: 2 years ago I tried the Caol Ila 1982 from Archives. What a fantastic whisky. Since then I always try to stock these Caol Ila from the 80s. Sadly no
  • WhiskyNotes: The real problem is that Caol Ila isn't selling (mature) casks to independent bottlers any more, from what I've heard, so chances are low we'll see mo

Coming up

  • Inchgower 1975 (Maltbarn)
  • Octomore 6.3 258ppm
  • Peated Irish 1991 (Eiling Lim)
  • Ardbeg 1974 for Christmas
  • Spirit of Freedom 30 Years
  • Elements of Islay Cl7
  • Benromach 5 Year Old

1681 notes by Ruben

WhiskyNotes - Ruben LuytenThis blog is my personal collection of impressions, written while searching for the ultimate single malt whisky.