<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>WhiskyNotes &#187; 28yo</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.whiskynotes.be/tag/28yo/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.whiskynotes.be</link>
	<description>Whisky blog and tasting notes</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 08:29:18 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Port Ellen 1983 (Old Bothwell cask #230)</title>
		<link>http://www.whiskynotes.be/2012/port-ellen/port-ellen-1983-old-bothwell-cask-230/</link>
		<comments>http://www.whiskynotes.be/2012/port-ellen/port-ellen-1983-old-bothwell-cask-230/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Jan 2012 00:44:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ruben</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Port Ellen]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[1983]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[28yo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[55.5%]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[islay]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[old bothwell]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.whiskynotes.be/?p=10483</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Port Ellen 28 yo 1983 (55,5%, Old Bothwell 2011, cask #230, 179 btl.) - 92/100]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A couple of weeks ago, Fredrik posted a comment that the <a href="http://www.whiskynotes.be/2011/port-ellen/port-ellen-1983-the-whiskyman/">Port Ellen 1983 bottled by The Whiskyman</a> was supposed to be the same whisky as this <strong>Old Bothwell cask #230</strong>.</p>
<p>We all know Old Bothwell has good contacts in Belgium, the alcohol volume is exactly the same and 120 bottles doesn’t seem to be a full cask, so indeed it might have been a split cask. In the end it doesn’t matter, let’s just enjoy the Old Bothwell release.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<h1><img style="background-image: none; margin: 0px 45px 10px 10px; padding-left: 0px; padding-right: 0px; display: inline; float: left; padding-top: 0px; border: 0px;" title="Port Ellen 1983 - Old Bothwell cask 230" src="http://www.whiskynotes.be/upload/4807c0784474_F1E4/PELIND1983_230.jpg" alt="Port Ellen 1983 - Old Bothwell cask 230" width="72" height="320" align="left" border="0" />Port Ellen 28 yo 1983 (55,5%, Old Bothwell 2011, cask #230, 179 btl.)</h1>
<p>Nose: sophisticated and balanced. Great mineral notes, lemon and grapefruit aromas, soft camphor, marzipan, walnuts, wet wool… all the typical things we’re expecting from a high-quality Port Ellen. Complex, crystal-sharp and rounded at the same time. Mouth: oily and more punchy now. There’s peat, brine, citrus, some oak but again also sweeter notes of marzipan and hazelnuts towards the end. And a nice pepper / ginger combo. Finish: very long with citrus, smoke and salty liquorice.</p>
<p>Very good Port Ellen. Could this be The Whiskyman’s cask? Yes, very much so. I’ve tried them side-by-side and couldn’t spot major differences. Nice surprise to see this one is still available and cheaper. Around € 170. Thanks for the sample, Fredrik!</p>
<p>Score: <strong><span style="color: #1f9bd8;">92</span><span style="color: #1f9bd8;">/100</span></strong></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.whiskynotes.be/2012/port-ellen/port-ellen-1983-old-bothwell-cask-230/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Clynelish 1982 (Malts of Scotland)</title>
		<link>http://www.whiskynotes.be/2011/clynelish/clynelish-1982-malts-of-scotland-2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.whiskynotes.be/2011/clynelish/clynelish-1982-malts-of-scotland-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Nov 2011 01:19:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ruben</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Clynelish]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[1982]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[28yo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[53.7%]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[highlands]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[malts of scotland]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.whiskynotes.be/2011/clynelish/clynelish-1982-malts-of-scotland-2/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Clynelish 28 yo 1982 (53,7%, Malts of Scotland 2011, MoS 11015, 275 btl.) - 91/100]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A direct comparison this time. The <a href="http://www.whiskynotes.be/2011/clynelish/clynelish-1982-single-malts-of-scotland/">Clynelish 1982 by Single Malts of Scotland</a> against this version by <strong>Malts of Scotland</strong>. This one has an impressive strength of 53,7%, let’s see if the added punch alters the delicate <strong>Clynelish</strong> profile.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<h1><img style="background-image: none; margin: 40px 0px 20px 40px; padding-left: 0px; padding-right: 0px; display: inline; float: right; padding-top: 0px; border-width: 0px;" title="Clynelish 1982 Malts of Scotland" src="http://www.whiskynotes.be/upload/Clynelish-1982-Malts-of-Scotland_E70F/15400.jpg" alt="Clynelish 1982 Malts of Scotland" width="120" height="320" align="right" border="0" />Clynelish 28 yo 1982 (53,7%, Malts of Scotland 2011, MoS 11015, 275 btl.)</h1>
<p>Nose: a lot punchier than the SMOS cask. More green banana. A tad more oak as well although that may be part of the higher strength. A lot of honeydew melon and beeswax (warm and honeyed compared to the sharper oiliness of the SMOS). Walnut liqueur. Apples with cinnamon. Some biscuity notes. Guimauves (the white ones). Great nose. Mouth: punchy again. Key components are vanilla and grapefruit this time, with some peppery notes. Hints of sweet almonds. Less complex and slightly less convincing than the nose, but still a nice whisky. Lemon zest and a slight coastal edge towards the end. Finish: long and elegant, zesty at first but coming back to a fruity sweetness.</p>
<p>For me this is the better Clynelish of the two, especially on the nose, although you could say they’re two different kinds of whisky alltogether (this one showing a slightly more 1970&#8242;s character). A little more expensive: around € 125.</p>
<p>Score: <strong><span style="color: #1f9bd8;">91</span><span style="color: #1f9bd8;">/100</span></strong></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.whiskynotes.be/2011/clynelish/clynelish-1982-malts-of-scotland-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Clynelish 1982 (Single Malts of Scotland)</title>
		<link>http://www.whiskynotes.be/2011/clynelish/clynelish-1982-single-malts-of-scotland/</link>
		<comments>http://www.whiskynotes.be/2011/clynelish/clynelish-1982-single-malts-of-scotland/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Nov 2011 01:11:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ruben</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Clynelish]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[1982]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[28yo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[43.1%]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[highlands]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SMOS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[the whisky exchange]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[whisky show]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.whiskynotes.be/2011/clynelish/clynelish-1982-single-malts-of-scotland/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Clynelish 28 yo 1982 (43,1%, Single Malts of Scotland 2011, hogshead #3985, 175 btl.) - 89/100]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This <strong>Clynelish</strong> was distilled 15 December 1982 and bottled in September 2011 for The Whisky Show in London in the <a href="http://www.whiskynotes.be/tag/smos/">Single Malts of Scotland</a> range.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<h1><img style="background-image: none; margin: 20px 10px 10px 50px; padding-left: 0px; padding-right: 0px; display: inline; float: right; padding-top: 0px; border: 0px;" title="Clynelish 1982 - Single Malts of Scotland" src="http://www.whiskynotes.be/upload/Clynelish-1982-Malts-of-Scotland_DF74/CLYSDL1982.jpg" alt="Clynelish 1982 - Single Malts of Scotland" width="71" height="320" align="right" border="0" />Clynelish 28 yo 1982 (43,1%, Single Malts of Scotland 2011, hogshead #3985, 175 btl.)</h1>
<p>Nose: delicate and mellow, even a little inexpressive at first. After a while it opens up with a juicy fruitiness (lime, yellow apple, white peach, something Albariño-esque), typical waxy notes (paraffin, lemon candles) and flinty notes in the background. Soft hints of vanilla. Faint grassy notes. Very nice but the strength makes you work harder to get the aromas. Mouth: waxy and citrusy (grapefruit, lemon). A few mineral touches. A bit more oaky dryness now, with hints of fruit tea. It seems too delicate to completely withstand the wood. Finish: waxy, lemony and faintly bitterish. Medium long.</p>
<p>Too bad this one was really soft. It&#8217;s great as long as you don&#8217;t compare it to similar Clynelish. I’ve had better ones, with just as much fruits, more punch and a better balance with the oak. Around € 110. Temporarily out of stock on the TWE website, but more is expected at the beginning of December.</p>
<p>Score: <strong><span style="color: #1f9bd8;">89</span><span style="color: #1f9bd8;">/100</span></strong></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.whiskynotes.be/2011/clynelish/clynelish-1982-single-malts-of-scotland/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Port Ellen 1983 (Malts of Scotland)</title>
		<link>http://www.whiskynotes.be/2011/port-ellen/port-ellen-1983-malts-of-scotland-58-9/</link>
		<comments>http://www.whiskynotes.be/2011/port-ellen/port-ellen-1983-malts-of-scotland-58-9/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Nov 2011 01:20:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ruben</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Port Ellen]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[1983]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[28yo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[58.9%]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[islay]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[malts of scotland]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.whiskynotes.be/2011/port-ellen/port-ellen-1983-malts-of-scotland-2/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Port Ellen 28 yo 1983 (58,9%, Malts of Scotland 2011, bourbon hogshead, MoS 11011, 267 btl.) - 92/100]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Let’s compare yesterday’s <a href="http://www.whiskynotes.be/2011/port-ellen/port-ellen-1983-the-whiskyman/">Port Ellen 1983 by The Whiskyman</a> to this similar release bottled a few weeks ago by <strong>Malts of Scotland</strong>. Dominiek Bouckaert, the man behind The Whiskyman, is also the importer of Malts of Scotland in Belgium.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<h1><img style="background-image: none; margin: 40px 10px 10px 40px; padding-left: 0px; padding-right: 0px; display: inline; float: right; padding-top: 0px; border: 0px;" title="Port Ellen 1983 Malts of Scotland" src="http://www.whiskynotes.be/upload/2a1912fe3e19_CC1C/PortEllen1983MoS.jpg" alt="Port Ellen 1983 Malts of Scotland" width="104" height="307" align="right" border="0" />Port Ellen 28 yo 1983 (58,9%, Malts of Scotland 2011, bourbon hogshead, MoS 11011, 267 btl.)</h1>
<p>Nose: it shows the same balanced mixture of briny coastal elements, sooty smoke and rounded fruitiness. Lemon and walnuts. It would be difficult to differentiate between the two, but maybe this MoS version develops a tiny bit more sweet vanilla / dried fruits over time, which is nice, but differences are really small. Both excellent. Mouth: powerful on the palate again. In no particular order: peat, smoke, bags of lemons, sweet grapefruit, pepper, brine… Similarly nervous. Again a tad more candied or is this my imagination? In the end there&#8217;s a hint of bitterness. Finish: similar length, similar flavours, similar quality.</p>
<p>Another Port Ellen of very high quality, difficult to pick a favourite so let&#8217;s not do that. Good news for those who missed out on the Whiskyman release. This Malts of Scotland version has just arrived in stores. Around € 200.</p>
<p>Score: <strong><span style="color: #1f9bd8;">92</span><span style="color: #1f9bd8;">/100</span></strong></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.whiskynotes.be/2011/port-ellen/port-ellen-1983-malts-of-scotland-58-9/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>BenRiach 1976 (cask #8079 &#8211; Craigellachie)</title>
		<link>http://www.whiskynotes.be/2011/benriach/benriach-1976-8079-craigellachie/</link>
		<comments>http://www.whiskynotes.be/2011/benriach/benriach-1976-8079-craigellachie/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Sep 2011 23:38:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ruben</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[BenRiach]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[1976]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[28yo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Craigellachie]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[single cask]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Speyside]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.whiskynotes.be/2011/benriach/benriach-1976-cask-8079/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[BenRiach 28 yo 1976 (57,6%, OB for Craigellachie Hotel 2005, cask #8079, 144 btl.) - 89/100]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>BenRiach 1976</strong> is now quite legendary and a large part of this fame was initiated by this single cask bottled for Craigellachie Hotel in September 2005.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<h1></h1>
<h1><img style="background-image: none; margin: 35px 0px 0px 60px; padding-left: 0px; padding-right: 0px; display: inline; float: right; padding-top: 0px; border: 0px;" title="BenRiach 1976 8079 Craigellachie" src="http://www.whiskynotes.be/upload/4c3e082eb254_B5E1/3782.jpg" alt="BenRiach 1976 8079 Craigellachie" width="101" height="320" align="right" border="0" />BenRiach 28 yo 1976 (57,6%, OB for Craigellachie Hotel 2005, cask #8079,<br />
144 btl.)</h1>
<p>Nose: a sweet and surprisingly creamy 1976, with peach yoghurt and strawberries with clotted cream. Lots of banana aromas. Hints of coconut and vanilla. Some guava and melon. A very seductive fruit salad which gets more tropical by the minute. Hints of marshmallows. Soft oak and very gentle spices with a very faint earthy / mossy undertone as well. Maybe not the most complex, but warmer and more velvety than I remember other 1976’s. Mouth: plenty of oak now, with some pine resin and spices. Then it develops the creaminess again with coconut oil and vanilla. The tropical fruitiness is less impressive now and has changed into fruit tea rather than a fruit salad. Some green, leafy notes as well. Liquorice and eucalyptus. Some late toffee. Finish: stretches the wood resin a little further, with some bitterness now. Liquorice. Maybe traces of smoke?</p>
<p>A great nose on this BenRiach 1976 for Craigellachie Hotel, but I found it slightly disappointing on the palate because of the subdued fruits and fierce oak. Later 1976 bottlings were better in my opinion &#8211; this one doesn&#8217;t reach 90 points in my view. Slightly over-hyped (and over-paid at auctions) maybe, but still a nice classic. Long gone of course.</p>
<p>Score: <strong><span style="color: #1f9bd8;">89/</span><span style="color: #1f9bd8;">100</span></strong></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.whiskynotes.be/2011/benriach/benriach-1976-8079-craigellachie/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Teaninich 1982 (Liquid Sun)</title>
		<link>http://www.whiskynotes.be/2011/teaninich/teaninich-1982-liquid-sun/</link>
		<comments>http://www.whiskynotes.be/2011/teaninich/teaninich-1982-liquid-sun/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Aug 2011 06:26:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ruben</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Teaninich]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[1982]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[28yo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[50.5%]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[highlands]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[liquid sun]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.whiskynotes.be/2011/teaninich/teaninich-1982-liquid-sun/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Teaninich 28 yo 1982 (50,5%, Liquid Sun 2011, bourbon hogshead, 114 btl.) - 85/100]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bladnoch, Acorn and Douglais Laing have bottled casks of <strong>Teaninich 1982</strong> in the last few months, which is great as we don’t see Teaninch on the market very often. Today we’re trying a release by <strong>Liquid Sun</strong>.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<h1><img style="background-image: none; margin: 0px 45px 10px 10px; padding-left: 0px; padding-right: 0px; display: inline; float: left; padding-top: 0px; border: 0px;" title="Teaninich 1982 (Liquid Sun)" src="http://www.whiskynotes.be/upload/Teaninich-1982-Liquid-Sun_B4F6/78acd3134a9961771fb58ed041453e92.jpg" alt="Teaninich 1982 (Liquid Sun)" width="65" height="320" align="left" border="0" />Teaninich 28 yo 1982 (50,5%, Liquid Sun 2011, bourbon hogshead, 114 btl.)</h1>
<p>Nose: elegant and medium fruity (apples, quinces, white grape juice) with plenty of oak polish and linseed oil. Some gristy notes as well. Hay and wet leaves. Mint, soft pepper. Nice balance of fruits and a Highlands austerity. Mouth: gentle start, but full of flavour, again rather gristy with hints of sawdust. After that it grows sweeter and fruitier, with honey, sweet barley and warming oak spices. Cloves and white pepper. Finish: spicy dryness from the oak, with hints of vanilla and tea.</p>
<p>A fairly neutral Teaninch, with pleasant Highlands elements, soft fruits and a perfect dose of oak influence. A nice bottling if you want to get acquainted with this low profile distillery. Around € 120.</p>
<p>Score: <strong><span style="color: #1f9bd8;">85</span><span style="color: #1f9bd8;">/100</span></strong></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.whiskynotes.be/2011/teaninich/teaninich-1982-liquid-sun/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Mannochmore 1982 (Liquid Sun)</title>
		<link>http://www.whiskynotes.be/2011/mannochmore/mannochmore-1982-liquid-sun/</link>
		<comments>http://www.whiskynotes.be/2011/mannochmore/mannochmore-1982-liquid-sun/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Jul 2011 22:20:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ruben</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Mannochmore]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[1982]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[28yo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[49.4%]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[liquid sun]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Speyside]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.whiskynotes.be/?p=8578</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Mannochmore 28 yo 1982 (49,4%, Liquid Sun 2011, bourbon hogshead, 131 btl.) - 85/100]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Mannochmore</strong> is one of these active distilleries that is hardly seen on the market. It’s modern (founded in 1971 on the grounds of the Glenlossie distillery) and focused on producing blender’s whisky. Here’s a 28 year-old single cask bottled by <a href="http://www.whiskynotes.be/2011/whisky-news/liquid-sun/">Liquid Sun</a>.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<h1><img style="background-image: none; margin: 0px 10px 10px 50px; padding-left: 0px; padding-right: 0px; display: inline; float: right; padding-top: 0px; border-width: 0px;" title="Mannochmore 1982 Liquid Sun" src="http://www.whiskynotes.be/upload/Mannochmore-1982-Liquid-Sun_FEF8/7cb83b347ca51b1df58091f66dea0cd0.jpg" alt="Mannochmore 1982 Liquid Sun" width="65" height="320" align="right" border="0" />Mannochmore 28 yo 1982 (49,4%,<br />
Liquid Sun 2011, bourbon hogshead, 131 btl.)</h1>
<p>Nose: slightly neutral start on malt and grassy notes. Green apples and lemon. Some flowery top notes as well. Then grows a bit warmer, with quite a lot of hay. Soft leather. Rather elegant, it seems younger than it actually is and the fruitiness is pleasantly dry and mineral at the same time. Mouth: quite soft at first, with orchard fruits, grassy notes and some spices. There’s a nervousness / hotness with herbal notes growing over time. Again an interesting mix of sweet notes and lots of dry, spicy (even slightly earthy) elements. Finish: medium length, spicy with a bitter edge.</p>
<p>A Mannochmore with a pleasant “green” fruitiness and quite some grassy / mineral notes. Give it some time to open up.<br />
Around € 110.</p>
<p>Score: <strong><span style="color: #1f9bd8;">85</span><span style="color: #1f9bd8;">/100</span></strong></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.whiskynotes.be/2011/mannochmore/mannochmore-1982-liquid-sun/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Glendullan 1981 (Whisky Agency)</title>
		<link>http://www.whiskynotes.be/2011/glendullan/glendullan-1981-whisky-agency/</link>
		<comments>http://www.whiskynotes.be/2011/glendullan/glendullan-1981-whisky-agency/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Jun 2011 05:48:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ruben</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Glendullan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[1981]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[28yo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[49.6%]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[flowers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Speyside]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[whisky agency]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.whiskynotes.be/2011/glendullan/glendullan-1981-whisky-agency/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Glendullan 28 yo 1981 (49,6%, Whisky Agency ‘Flowers’ 2010, bourbon hogshead, 247 btl.) - 86/100]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Glendullan</strong> is mostly known as the USA offering in the <strong>Singleton</strong> range (together with Glen Ord for Asia and Dufftown for Europe).</p>
<p><img style="background-image: none; margin: 20px 40px 10px 10px; padding-left: 0px; padding-right: 0px; display: inline; float: left; padding-top: 0px; border-width: 0px;" title="Glendullan 1981 TWA Flowers" src="http://www.whiskynotes.be/upload/Glendullan-1981-Whisky-Agency_93BC/11368.jpg" border="0" alt="Glendullan 1981 TWA Flowers" width="70" height="320" align="left" />Today we review a <strong>Glendullan 1981</strong> bottled by The Whisky Agency in the <a href="http://www.whiskynotes.be/2009/whisky-news/whisky-agency/">Flowers series</a>.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<h1>Glendullan 28 yo 1981 (49,6%, Whisky Agency ‘Flowers’ 2010, bourbon hogshead, 247 btl.)</h1>
<p>Nose: Speyside style with extra mineral / flinty notes. Unripe pears, gooseberries, some mint and citrus. There’s also a vegetal side (fern, cooked vegetables). Hints of wet chalk and faint smoky notes hidden underneath. Mouth: quite oily and grainy, with mineral and herbal elements. Medium oak and spices. Lots of ginger. The fruits are in the background (crystallized oranges, melon). Citrus peel and ginger towards the end. Finish: pretty spicy with ginger, pepper and cloves.</p>
<p>A complex and slightly unsexy Speysider with a few unusual notes. Still available in some places. Around € 120.</p>
<p>Score: <strong><span style="color: #1f9bd8;">86</span><span style="color: #1f9bd8;">/100</span></strong></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.whiskynotes.be/2011/glendullan/glendullan-1981-whisky-agency/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Inchgower 1982 (Whisky-Doris)</title>
		<link>http://www.whiskynotes.be/2011/inchgower/inchgower-1982-whisky-doris/</link>
		<comments>http://www.whiskynotes.be/2011/inchgower/inchgower-1982-whisky-doris/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 May 2011 03:12:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ruben</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Inchgower]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[1982]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[28yo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[56.6%]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Speyside]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[whisky-doris]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.whiskynotes.be/?p=7979</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Inchgower 28 yo 1982 (56,6%, Whisky-Doris 2010, bourbon hogshead #6971, 192 btl.) - 90/100]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In the past, sister casks were bottled by Bladnoch (#6965, 6966), Berry Bros (#6968) and <a href="http://www.whiskynotes.be/2011/inchgower/inchgower-1982-malts-of-scotland/">Malts of Scotland (#6969)</a>. As Doris &amp; Herbert told me last weekend, they wanted to show a different kind of Inchgower after the <a href="http://www.whiskynotes.be/2011/inchgower/inchgower-1974-whisky-doris/">Inchgower 1974</a> bottled last year.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<h1><img style="margin: 20px 45px 30px 10px; border: 0px currentColor; padding-top: 0px; padding-right: 0px; padding-left: 0px; display: inline; background-image: none;" title="Inchgower 1982 Whisky-Doris" src="http://www.whiskynotes.be/upload/07a1fa9044a7_DD6A/Inchgower28W-D.jpg" alt="Inchgower 1982 Whisky-Doris" width="63" height="320" align="left" border="0" />Inchgower 28 yo 1982 (56,6%, Whisky-Doris 2010, bourbon hogshead #6971, 192 btl.)</h1>
<p>Nose: unique notes of very ripe banana, buttercups and a slightly strange milky element (like a milk steamed Oolong tea or even hints of buttermilk). Quite oily. Hazelnuts and almond paste. Plenty of vanilla cream. Hay. Faint coastal notes. Very complex and quite unique. Mouth: again it shows a certain buttermilk note, even something of a Hollandaise sauce (now that may sound strange but it’s actually quite nice). Sweet marzipan and vanilla. Intense pepper and sharper grassy notes. Sugared camomile tea and a hint of bitter oak. Finish: quite long with pepper and salt and a praline note.</p>
<p>I don’t think I’ve tasted anything like this before. Impressive butteriness, that works out well. Very complex altogether, with intense spicy, salty, sweet, buttery, bitter and nutty flavours! Bonus point for having such a unique character, although I suppose many people will find this way too strange. Around € 110.</p>
<p>Score: <strong><span style="color: #1f9bd8;">90</span><span style="color: #1f9bd8;">/100</span></strong></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.whiskynotes.be/2011/inchgower/inchgower-1982-whisky-doris/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Ardbeg 1972 (DL for Alambic Germany)</title>
		<link>http://www.whiskynotes.be/2011/ardbeg/ardbeg-1972-alambic-germany/</link>
		<comments>http://www.whiskynotes.be/2011/ardbeg/ardbeg-1972-alambic-germany/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Apr 2011 08:07:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ruben</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Ardbeg]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[1972]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[28yo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[50.1%]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[alambic classique]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[douglas laing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[germany]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[islay]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[OMC]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.whiskynotes.be/2011/ardbeg/ardbeg-1972-dl-for-alambic-germany/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Ardbeg 28 yo 1972 (50,1%, Douglas Laing for Alambic Classique Germany 2000, 234 btl.) - 94/100]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A few <strong>Ardbeg</strong> distilled in 1972 are truly legendary. The one for Velier Italy, the Ardbeggedon for PLOWED… many of them appear in shortlists of connoisseurs.</p>
<p>The one we’re tasting now is quite famous as well. It was distilled in November 1972 and bottled for <strong>Alambic Classique</strong>, a German spirits importer founded by Hermann Suppanz.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<h1><img style="margin: 35px 40px 40px 10px; border: 0px currentColor; padding-top: 0px; padding-right: 0px; padding-left: 0px; display: inline; background-image: none;" title="Ardbeg 1972 DL Alambic Germany" src="http://www.whiskynotes.be/upload/Ardbeg-1972-DL-for-Alambic-Germany_F369/8121504.jpg" border="0" alt="Ardbeg 1972 DL Alambic Germany" width="115" height="320" align="left" />Ardbeg 28 yo 1972 (50,1%, Douglas Laing for Alambic Classique Germany 2000,<br />
234 btl.)</h1>
<p>Nose: wow. Let’s start by saying it’s quite organic and farmy, with notes of fern forest and wet leaves. Stables and sheep. Tobacco as well. Then some deep tarry notes and peat, nicely balanced. On a third layer, there’s something in between mint and dental filling material, if you know what I mean. Medicinal and mineral notes, maybe even some rubber or diesel. Leather. Algae. Quite dry, but wonderful. Mouth: quite dry again and rather salty. Liquorice and ashes. Lovely peat with camphor. Again some rubber. Cecina de León. Lots of algae. Not overly complex and missing punch in the middle, but still excellent. Finish: long, salty and dry.</p>
<p><em>Spitzenklasse</em>, as they say in Germany. A true classic and as I said, it&#8217;s famous so the last bottle sold on Whiskyauction fetched € 740. Many thanks for the sample, Thomas!</p>
<p>Score: <strong><span style="color: #1f9bd8;">94</span><span style="color: #1f9bd8;">/100</span></strong></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.whiskynotes.be/2011/ardbeg/ardbeg-1972-alambic-germany/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Inchgower 1982 (Malts of Scotland)</title>
		<link>http://www.whiskynotes.be/2011/inchgower/inchgower-1982-malts-of-scotland/</link>
		<comments>http://www.whiskynotes.be/2011/inchgower/inchgower-1982-malts-of-scotland/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Apr 2011 07:17:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ruben</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Inchgower]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[1982]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[28yo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[57.2%]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[malts of scotland]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Speyside]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.whiskynotes.be/?p=7292</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Inchgower 28 yo 1982 (57,2%, Malts of Scotland 2011, bourbon hogshead #6969, 212 btl.) - 86/100]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This <strong>Inchgower 1982 </strong>is a sister cask of the ones bottled by Bladnoch (#6965 and #6966), the one from Berry Bros. and Rudd (cask #6968) and a recent one bottled by Whisky-Doris (cask #6971).</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<h1><img style="margin: 35px 35px 30px 5px; border: 0px currentColor; padding-top: 0px; padding-right: 0px; padding-left: 0px; display: inline; background-image: none;" title="Inchgower 1982 Malts of Scotland" src="http://www.whiskynotes.be/upload/Inchgower-1982-Malts-of-Scotland_D176/1982_6969_1299665509.jpg" border="0" alt="Inchgower 1982 Malts of Scotland" width="106" height="320" align="left" />Inchgower 28 yo 1982 (57,2%, Malts of Scotland 2011, bourbon hogshead #6969,<br />
212 btl.)</h1>
<p>Nose: starts strong but warm, with some vanilla and cooked fruits. It quickly gets more grassy (fresh and dried), gingery and minty with light hints of garden herbs. Spiced up with some fresh sawdust, traces of smoke and a slightly sharp, salty breeze. Mouth: the first wave is slightly milky and creamy (vanilla ice cream?). Then some citrus notes (ripe tangerine). After a while, a big wave of oak comes rolling in, in a nice, slightly bourbonny way (pine wood, resin, cedar maybe). Not tannic, just a little oak-flavoured, subtly bitter and heavily spiced. Soft toffee and demarara sugar in the background. Leather. A hint of parma violets. Finish: medium length, with traces of fruits, salt and lingering oak.</p>
<p>Even though it&#8217;s not very rounded, this Inchgower stands out in a good way and has a nice coastal edge. Be sure to try it if you&#8217;re not afraid of some wood nectar and plenty of spices on the palate. Around € 115.</p>
<p>Score: <strong><span style="color: #1f9bd8;">86</span><span style="color: #1f9bd8;">/100</span></strong></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.whiskynotes.be/2011/inchgower/inchgower-1982-malts-of-scotland/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Aultmore 1982 (A.D. Rattray)</title>
		<link>http://www.whiskynotes.be/2011/aultmore/aultmore-1982-ad-rattray/</link>
		<comments>http://www.whiskynotes.be/2011/aultmore/aultmore-1982-ad-rattray/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Mar 2011 06:10:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ruben</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Aultmore]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[1982]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[28yo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[56.1%]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dewar rattray]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Speyside]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.whiskynotes.be/2011/aultmore/aultmore-1982-a-d-rattray/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Aultmore 28 yo 1982 (56,1%, A.D. Rattray 2011, cask #2214, 150 btl.) - 82/100]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Another bottle from the recent series of <strong>A.D. Rattray</strong> releases, a 28 years old <strong>Aultmore 1982</strong>. Two sister casks (#2216 and #2217) have been bottled for Bladnoch Forum in 2010.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<h1><img style="background-image: none; margin: 30px 40px 10px 10px; padding-left: 0px; padding-right: 0px; display: inline; float: left; padding-top: 0px; border: 0px;" title="Aultmore 1982 A.D. Rattray" src="http://www.whiskynotes.be/upload/Old-Pulteney_FB0E/Aultmore_Rattrey_1982.jpg" border="0" alt="Aultmore 1982 A.D. Rattray" width="110" height="320" align="left" />Aultmore 28 yo 1982 (56,1%,<br />
A.D. Rattray 2011, cask #2214, 150 btl.)</h1>
<p>Nose: starts on hay and grass. A bit mashy and buttery as well, very natural I would say. Hints of lemongrass. Apple compote. Some milk chocolate. Whiffs of nutmeg. Water makes it slightly fragrant, even slightly soapy. Mouth: a bit sharp (ginger, cloves) with a slight alcoholic punch at first. Growing bitter (lemon skin, grapefruit). The bitterness is enhanced by the woody notes. Liquorice. Seville oranges with a nice but slightly hot afterglow on vanilla. Softer and rounder with a few drops of water. Finish: intense spices, vanilla and a chocolate coating.</p>
<p>This Aultmore has some good elements (fruity, firm spices) but also a few downsides (quite harsh and bitter). I suppose all is due to a (slightly over-)active cask. Not bad at all but I’ll pass because there are currently better releases on offer from this bottler in my opinion. Around € 100.</p>
<p>Score: <strong><span style="color: #1f9bd8;">82</span><span style="color: #1f9bd8;">/100</span></strong></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.whiskynotes.be/2011/aultmore/aultmore-1982-ad-rattray/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Port Ellen 1982 (Whiskysite.nl / QV.ID)</title>
		<link>http://www.whiskynotes.be/2011/port-ellen/port-ellen-1982-whiskysite-qvid/</link>
		<comments>http://www.whiskynotes.be/2011/port-ellen/port-ellen-1982-whiskysite-qvid/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Mar 2011 06:40:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ruben</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Port Ellen]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[1982]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[28yo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[islay]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[luc timmermans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[qvid]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[whiskysite]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.whiskynotes.be/2011/port-ellen/port-ellen-1982-whiskysite-nl-qv-id/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Port Ellen 28yo 1982 (57,5%, Whiskysite.nl / QV.ID 2010, refill sherry puncheon, 136 btl.) - 92/100]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This 28 years old <strong>Port Ellen 1982</strong> was a single cask selected by Luc Timmermans for two whisky shops. The biggest part was bottled for<br />
<a href="http://www.whiskysite.nl/" target="_blank">De Druiventuin / Whiskysite</a> in Leiden (Holland) and a smaller part is available from <a href="http://www.qvid.be/" target="_blank">QV.ID</a> in Huldenberg (Belgium).</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<h1><img style="background-image: none; margin: 30px 0px 20px 45px; padding-left: 0px; padding-right: 0px; display: inline; float: right; padding-top: 0px; border-width: 0px;" title="Port Ellen 1982 - Whiskysite / QV.ID" src="http://www.whiskynotes.be/upload/Port-Ellen-1982-_C552/thosop_bottle.jpg" border="0" alt="Port Ellen 1982 - Whiskysite / QV.ID" width="121" height="320" align="right" />Port Ellen 28yo 1982 (57,5%, Whiskysite.nl / QV.ID 2010, refill sherry puncheon, 136 btl.)</h1>
<p>Nose: an array of typical Port Ellen notes. Gentle peat and maritime notes (seashells). Hints of plaster. Velvety vanilla as well (which I think is essential in a good Port Ellen). Almonds. Soft hints of sweet fruits but no real sherry character. Gets a tad drier over time with some nutmeg and tobacco. Mouth: mouth-coating and creamy, again nicely sweet and fruity. Sugared lemon juice. A bit of pepper, a bit of salt. More peat than on the nose, as well as some mineral notes, but it returns nicely to soft vanilla and a little honey. Rich and balanced. Finish: lemon and smoke with a hint of aniseed in the very end.</p>
<p>A couple of years ago, it seemed 1982/83 were lesser years for Port Ellen. We already know it’s not true. Congratulations to Luc, Jack and Koen for this great selection. Around € 200 – now sold out.</p>
<p>Score: <strong><span style="color: #1f9bd8;">92</span><span style="color: #1f9bd8;">/100</span></strong></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.whiskynotes.be/2011/port-ellen/port-ellen-1982-whiskysite-qvid/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Longmorn 1974 (Scottish Castles)</title>
		<link>http://www.whiskynotes.be/2010/longmorn/longmorn-1974-scottish-castles/</link>
		<comments>http://www.whiskynotes.be/2010/longmorn/longmorn-1974-scottish-castles/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Dec 2010 08:44:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ruben</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Longmorn]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[1974]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[28yo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[46%]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[JWWW]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[scottish castles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Speyside]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.whiskynotes.be/2010/longmorn/longmorn-1974-scottish-castles/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Longmorn 28 yo 1974 (46%, Jack Wiebers Scottish Castles 2003, cask #3495, 132 btl.) - 91/100]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Scottish Castles</strong> is a range of whiskies bottled for the German company <strong>Jack Wiebers Whisky World</strong>. Each expression features a famous Scottish castle on the label (Crathes castle in this case). This Longmorn 1974 was part of the 8th series.</p>
<p>Its sister cask #3494 was a bourbon hogshead bottled for <strong>The Whisky Fair</strong> in 2006, so it’s probably safe to think this was an ex-bourbon cask as well.</p>
<p><br class="spacer_" /></p>
<h1><img style="background-image: none; margin: 0px 0px 10px 50px; padding-left: 0px; padding-right: 0px; display: inline; float: right; padding-top: 0px; border: 0px;" title="Longmorn 1974 Scottish Castles 3495" src="http://www.whiskynotes.be/upload/Longmorn-1974-Scottish-Castles_B25E/Untitled-2.jpg" border="0" alt="Longmorn 1974 Scottish Castles" width="72" height="320" align="right" />Longmorn 28 yo 1974 (46%, Jack Wiebers <br />
Scottish Castles 2003, cask #3495, 132 btl.)</h1>
<p>Nose: starts on varnish and a little turpentine. After fifteen minutes of breathing, it has developed an excellent fruity profile with ripe honeydew melon, peaches, and soft vanilla. Great hints of strawberries and cream! Pleasant resinous notes without being oaky. A little mint. Lovely nose. Mouth: good impact, rather oily and very smooth. Showing some pink grapefruit and sweeter marmalade fruits. Some heather honey. Then a cocoa note. A little mint again. It must have been superb at cask strength. Finish: long, with spices as the main ingredient. Not dry though. Plenty of vanilla in the end.</p>
<p>An elegant Longmorn. Both bourbon and sherry versions of this distillery can be great at such an age. Difficult to find now – around € 200.</p>
<p>Score: <strong><span style="color: #1f9bd8;">91</span><span style="color: #1f9bd8;">/100</span></strong></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.whiskynotes.be/2010/longmorn/longmorn-1974-scottish-castles/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Brora 1981 (Douglas Laing Platinum)</title>
		<link>http://www.whiskynotes.be/2010/brora/brora-1981-douglas-laing-platinum/</link>
		<comments>http://www.whiskynotes.be/2010/brora/brora-1981-douglas-laing-platinum/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Aug 2010 09:22:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ruben</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Brora]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[1981]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[28yo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[57.4%]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[douglas laing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[highlands]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[platinum]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sherry cask]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.whiskynotes.be/?p=5136</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Brora 28 yo 1981 (57,4%, Douglas Laing Old &#038; Rare Platinum 2009, 93 bottles) - 91/100]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As you may know, one my favourite drams so far is a <a href="http://www.whiskynotes.be/2009/brora/brora-30-years-1976-dl-old-rare-platinum/">30yo Brora 1976 by Douglas Laing</a>. It goes without saying that I’m on the lookout for similar bottles. This is one of them, although 1981 is usually a lesser year than 1976 for the distillery. Like the other one, this sherry cask is released in the <strong>Old &amp; Rare Platinum</strong> series of <strong>Douglas Laing</strong>, and there are just 93 bottles!</p>
<ul> <br class="spacer_" /></ul>
<h1><img style="margin: 15px 40px 40px 0px; display: inline; border: 0px;" title="Brora 1981/2009 DL Platinum" src="http://www.whiskynotes.be/upload/Brora1981DouglasLaingPlatinum_B9B6/Untitled2.jpg" border="0" alt="Brora 1981/2009 DL Platinum" width="158" height="293" align="left" /> Brora 28 yo 1981 (57,4%,<br />
Douglas Laing Old &amp; Rare Platinum 2009, 93 bottles)</h1>
<p>Nose: starts rather prickly and sharp. Wet dogs, leaves, drying hay, walnuts… A vegetal kind of farminess this time, no sheep involved&#8230; Anything but sweet, although this changes over time with some dried fruits, ginger ale and even coconut shining through. There’s also a Karuizawa kind of gunpowder, quite uncommon. Complex yet different from the 1970’s style. Gets more grassy with water, and it shows hints of tobacco. Mouth: again very vegetal, with leaves and sharp peat. Lemon balm. Hints of tobacco. Very herbal and grassy now. A lot less subtle than how I remember the 1976. When water is added, there’s wax to be found. Finish: long, on sharp peat and some pepper. Hints of gunpowder again.</p>
<p>This Brora is not as brilliant as its older brother, but it’s still excellent with a few unique touches. A bit too austere for me to get a higher score, but maybe you like this type of Brora more than I do. One problem: it&#8217;s around € 450 which I find quite hefty - the official Brora 30 yo&#8217;s are better value.</p>
<p>Score: <strong><span style="color: #1f9bd8;">91/100</span></strong></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.whiskynotes.be/2010/brora/brora-1981-douglas-laing-platinum/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Port Ellen 7th release (1979)</title>
		<link>http://www.whiskynotes.be/2010/port-ellen/port-ellen-7th-release-1979/</link>
		<comments>http://www.whiskynotes.be/2010/port-ellen/port-ellen-7th-release-1979/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 May 2010 07:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ruben</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Port Ellen]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[1979]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[28yo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[54.7%]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[diageo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[islay]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.whiskynotes.be/2010/port-ellen/port-ellen-7th-release-1979/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Port Ellen 28 yo 1979 ‘7th release’ (54,7%, OB 2007, 20cl) - 94/100]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Buying an <a href="http://www.thewhiskyexchange.com/P-7805.aspx" target="_blank">Islay Collection pack</a> is a popular way to get hold of an official <strong>Port Ellen</strong> bottling without braking the bank. However, these 20cl versions don’t contain the same whisky, and most of them are bottled at a different strength. In this case, the 20cl bottle contains 54,7% alcohol instead of 53,8% for the 70cl bottles. The reason is that they’re probably bottled at a different moment in time.</p>
<h1> </h1>
<h1><img style="margin: 15px 35px 30px 0px; display: inline; border: 0px;" title="Port Ellen 7th release" src="http://www.whiskynotes.be/upload/PortEllen7threlease1979_1286F/PELOB_1979V3.jpg" border="0" alt="Port Ellen 7th release" width="135" height="297" align="left" /> Port Ellen 28 yo 1979 ‘7th release’ <br />
(54,7%, OB 2007, 20cl)</h1>
<p>Nose: this one seems to be more floral, with much more vanilla. A great balance between the coastal notes (tarry ropes, seaweed) and candied notes. Big big vanilla. Lots of almonds and marzipan. Sweetened lime juice. Whiffs of mint. I adore this combination, it’s like peated candy. Mouth: this is the most complex Port Ellen in this trio. The candied notes remain, but they’re mingled with herbal notes (ginger, soft pepper), liquorice, Lapsang Souchong… Rather delicate peat. Some notes of cocoa. Finish: long, a tad more coastal now. Dry hints of oak and walnut skin.</p>
<p>A nice crescendo, starting soft and feminine (close to the <a href="http://www.whiskynotes.be/2009/port-ellen/port-ellen-9th-release/" target="_blank">Port Ellen 9th release</a> in that respect) but growing stronger on the palate. Outstanding composition and one of the best (explicitly) peated drams I&#8217;ve come across.</p>
<p>My personal favourite because of the wide flavours and the stunning nose. Still available in some places. Around € 275.</p>
<p>Score: <strong><span style="color: #1f9bd8;">94/100</span></strong></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.whiskynotes.be/2010/port-ellen/port-ellen-7th-release-1979/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Tomatin 1980 (cask 994)</title>
		<link>http://www.whiskynotes.be/2010/tomatin/tomatin-1980-cask-994/</link>
		<comments>http://www.whiskynotes.be/2010/tomatin/tomatin-1980-cask-994/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Feb 2010 23:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ruben</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Tomatin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[1980]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[28yo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[47.4%]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[highlands]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[single cask]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.whiskynotes.be/?p=3406</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Tomatin 1980 (47,4%, OB 2008, cask #994, 172 btl.) - 89/100]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Over the last few years, <strong>Tomatin</strong> had a makeover. A couple of years ago, there was just a standard 10 Year old, but nowadays they have a whole range of bottlings (12, 15, 18, 25, 30 and 40 Years old).</p>
<p>This single cask Tomatin 1980 was released in 2008.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<h1><img style="margin: 10px 0px 20px 40px; display: inline; border: 0px;" title="Tomatin 1980 single cask 994" src="http://www.whiskynotes.be/upload/Tomatin1980_F0DD/Untitled1_thumb.jpg" alt="Tomatin 1980 single cask 994" width="126" height="320" align="right" border="0" /> Tomatin 1980<br />
(47,4%, OB 2008, cask #994, 172 btl.)</h1>
<p>Nose: fresh start. Fruity notes (peaches, cherries) with marshmallow. Lovely passion fruits. Citrus. Some unripe banana and pineapple. Lots of vanilla. Gets a bit creamy after a while, absolutely delicious. Liquid dessert. Mouth: basically the same story with lots of fruits and notes of bubblegum and honey. Not far from some Irish profiles, but more complex I would say. Added hints of pink grapefruit. Unripe mango. Tropical but without the warmth or the sweetness that goes with it. Fresh, fruity, malty (hints of cereals) and slightly mineral. Finish: not too long. A bit more spicy notes (whiffs of ginger and cinnamon) and certainly sweeter.</p>
<p>A very nice Tomatin. Not cheap (around € 180) but really beautiful. Samples are available at <a href="http://whiskysamples.flyingcart.com/?p=detail&amp;pid=392&amp;cat_id=0" target="_blank">Whiskysamples.eu</a></p>
<p>Score: <strong><span style="color: #1f9bd8;">89/100</span></strong></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.whiskynotes.be/2010/tomatin/tomatin-1980-cask-994/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Lochside 1981 (La Maison du Whisky)</title>
		<link>http://www.whiskynotes.be/2009/lochside/lochside-1981-for-la-maison-du-whisky/</link>
		<comments>http://www.whiskynotes.be/2009/lochside/lochside-1981-for-la-maison-du-whisky/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Sep 2009 22:00:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ruben</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Lochside]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[1981]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[28yo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[56.1%]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gordon McPhail]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LMdW]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sherry cask]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Speyside]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[whisky live]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.whiskynotes.be/?p=2236</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Lochside 28yo 1981 (56,1%, Gordon &#038; MacPhail for LMdW 2009, refill sherry hogshead #803, 205 btl.) - 89/100]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Apart from the <a href="http://www.whiskynotes.be/2009/macallan/macallan-speymalt-1970-lmdw/">Macallan Speymalt 1970/2009</a>, this Lochside is another <strong>Gordon &amp; MacPhail</strong> release exclusively for <strong>La Maison du Whisky</strong>. It will be presented at Whisky Live Paris.</p>
<h1> </h1>
<h1><img style="margin: 15px 0px 10px 40px; display: inline; border: 0px;" title="La Maison du Whisky - Lochside 1981/2009" src="http://www.whiskynotes.be/upload/Lochside1981forLaMaisonduWhisky_F560/Untitled1.jpg" border="0" alt="Lochside 1981/2009 G&amp;M LMdW" width="89" height="320" align="right" />Lochside 28yo 1981 (56,1%, G&amp;M for La Maison du Whisky 2009, refill sherry hogshead #803, 205 btl.)</h1>
<p>Nose: very aromatic and complex. There’s so much going on that it was difficult to write everything down before another association came up. A rather sharp, mineral start. After two minutes, there is lovely lemon grass. Fruits as well, starting on grapefruit and tangerine but evolving into the tropical fruits (mango, pineapple). Obvious waxy notes as well (rather close in style to Clynelish). A few flowery notes. The sherry is rather shy. Mouth: very assertive. More oak influence now, fruity marmelade, still some wax. Lemon. Slightly peppery. Dried oranges. Finish: quite long on grapefruit. Drying with a spicy edge (pepper, liquorice).</p>
<p>A Lochside with a terrific nose that can entertain for a long time. On the palate, it’s less of a kameleon but still very very good. At around € 115, very good value for money.</p>
<p>Score: <span style="color: #0080ff;"><strong>89/100</strong></span></p>
<p>I’ll compare it to the <strong>Lochside 1987/2008 by The Whisky Agency (Perfect Dram series)</strong> in a few days.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.whiskynotes.be/2009/lochside/lochside-1981-for-la-maison-du-whisky/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

