<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>WhiskyNotes &#187; 37yo</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.whiskynotes.be/tag/37yo/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.whiskynotes.be</link>
	<description>Whisky blog and tasting notes</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 08:29:18 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Strathmill 1974 (Archives)</title>
		<link>http://www.whiskynotes.be/2012/strathmill/strathmill-1974-archives/</link>
		<comments>http://www.whiskynotes.be/2012/strathmill/strathmill-1974-archives/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Jan 2012 00:16:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ruben</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Strathmill]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[1974]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[37yo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[44.5%]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[archives]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Speyside]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[whiskybase]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.whiskynotes.be/?p=10679</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Strathmill 37 yo 1974 (44,5%, Archives 2011, bourbon hogshead #1231, 180 btl.) - 90/100]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Archives</strong> is the proprietary range of bottlings from the <a href="http://shop.whiskybase.com/" target="_blank">Whiskybase shop</a>. Now if you remember the <a href="http://www.whiskynotes.be/2011/strathmill/strathmill-1974-daily-dram/">Strathmill 1974 Daily Dram</a>, this could be great.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<h1><img style="background-image: none; margin: 0px 50px 10px 10px; padding-left: 0px; padding-right: 0px; display: inline; float: left; padding-top: 0px; border-width: 0px;" title="Strathmill 1974 Archives" src="http://www.whiskynotes.be/upload/653ce2a27a8d_A2A7/25064.jpg" alt="Strathmill 1974 Archives" width="79" height="320" align="left" border="0" />Strathmill 37 yo 1974 (44,5%, Archives 2011, bourbon hogshead #1231, 180 btl.)</h1>
<p>Nose: very fruity and honeyed, although maybe a tad less thick and buttery. Big hints of sweet orange juice. A little pineapple, less banana this time. Some vanilla cake. Over time it also shows some softly herbal, “green” notes and mint. Mouth: still fruity but again it’s less warm with more sourish and slightly bitter fruits (oranges, tangerine). Hints of green tea. More oak spices as well (especially ginger). Finish: medium long on oranges and lemons. Hints of tea with some warming oak.</p>
<p>It may be less stellar than its sister cask by The Nectar of the Daily Drams, but on its own it’s still a great dram from an otherwise underrated distillery. Around € 170.</p>
<p>Score: <strong><span style="color: #1f9bd8;">90</span><span style="color: #1f9bd8;">/100</span></strong></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.whiskynotes.be/2012/strathmill/strathmill-1974-archives/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Glencadam 1974 (Whisky-Fässle)</title>
		<link>http://www.whiskynotes.be/2011/glencadam/glencadam-1974-whiskyfassle/</link>
		<comments>http://www.whiskynotes.be/2011/glencadam/glencadam-1974-whiskyfassle/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Nov 2011 01:14:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ruben</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Glencadam]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[1974]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[37yo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[41.5%]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[highlands]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Whisky-Fässle]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[whiskybase]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.whiskynotes.be/2011/glencadam/glencadam-1974-whisky-fssle/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Glencadam 37 yo 1974 (41,5%, Whisky-Fässle 2011, refill sherry, joint bottling with Whiskybase) - 90/100]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The team behind <a href="http://whiskybase.com/" target="_blank">Whiskybase.com</a> have now started their own shop in Rotterdam (NL). Of course they’re bottling proprietary releases (labeled <strong>Archives</strong>, we’ll focus on that later) but they’re also bringing a few interesting independent bottlers to Holland. Mainly German bottlers like <a href="http://www.whiskynotes.be/tag/alambic-classique/">Alambic Classique</a>, <a href="http://www.whiskynotes.be/tag/whisky-doris/">Whisky-Doris</a> and <a href="http://www.whiskynotes.be/tag/whisky-fassle/">Whisky-Fässle</a> as well as others like Silver Seal.</p>
<p>A good reason to try this <strong>Glencadam 1974</strong>, a joint bottling between Whisky-Fässle and Whiskybase.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<h1><img style="background-image: none; margin: 0px 50px 10px 15px; padding-left: 0px; padding-right: 0px; display: inline; float: left; padding-top: 0px; border: 0px;" title="Glencadam 1974 (Whisky-Fässle + Whiskybase)" src="http://www.whiskynotes.be/upload/Glencadam-1974-Whisky-Fssle_AB38/25577.jpg" alt="Glencadam 1974" width="71" height="320" align="left" border="0" />Glencadam 37 yo 1974 (41,5%,<br />
Whisky-Fässle 2011, refill sherry,<br />
joint bottling with Whiskybase)</h1>
<p>Nose: complex and refined. A slightly subdued fruity layer (orange, tangerine, maybe guava) with additional layers of dried flowers and soft herbs (lovage), a leathery / oily touch and  faint hints of mocha. Subtle oak as well. More delicately sherried than last year’s <a href="http://www.whiskynotes.be/2010/glencadam/glencadam-1974-malts-of-scotland/">Malts of Scotland release</a>. Mouth: not extremely powerful (no surprise) but pleasant. Fruity notes (oranges), a little ginger and hints of herbal tea. Leather notes and oak. Finish: similar flavours. Medium long, nicely balanced and not too dry.</p>
<p>Not a flavour bomb, but still an excellent balance and pleasant ‘oldness’. A great example of this overlooked distillery. Around € 155.</p>
<p>Score: <strong><span style="color: #1f9bd8;">90</span><span style="color: #1f9bd8;">/100</span></strong></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.whiskynotes.be/2011/glencadam/glencadam-1974-whiskyfassle/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Strathmill 1974 (Daily Dram)</title>
		<link>http://www.whiskynotes.be/2011/strathmill/strathmill-1974-daily-dram/</link>
		<comments>http://www.whiskynotes.be/2011/strathmill/strathmill-1974-daily-dram/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Nov 2011 01:08:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ruben</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Strathmill]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[1974]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[37yo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[44.4%]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[daily dram]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Speyside]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[whisky agency]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.whiskynotes.be/2011/strathmill/strathmill-1974-daily-dram/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Strathmill 37 yo 1974 (44,4%, Daily Dram 2011, joint bottling with The Whisky Agency) - 92/100]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong><img style="margin: 0px 0px 10px 30px; display: inline; float: right;" title="Daily Dram" src="http://www.whiskynotes.be/upload/71300b6591ce_ABC3/Untitled-2.jpg" alt="Daily Dram" align="right" />Strathmill</strong>, the slightly obscure Speyside distillery operated by Diageo. We don’t see too many bottlings yet a lot of people thought this was the highlight of the <a href="http://www.whiskynotes.be/2011/whisky-news/spirits-in-the-sky-2011/">Spirits in the Sky</a> festival!</p>
<p>Released under the Daily Dram label in cooperation with The Whisky Agency.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<h1><img style="background-image: none; margin: 0px 50px 10px 10px; padding-left: 0px; padding-right: 0px; display: inline; float: left; padding-top: 0px; border-width: 0px;" title="Strathmill 1974 Daily Dram" src="http://www.whiskynotes.be/upload/Strathmill-1974-Daily-Dram_A50D/TWA_bottle_clean.jpg" alt="Strathmill 1974 Daily Dram" width="72" height="320" align="left" border="0" />Strathmill 37 yo 1974 (44,4%, Daily Dram 2011, joint bottling with The Whisky Agency)</h1>
<p>Nose: excellent start – sweet and buttery (fresh croissant, vanilla) with huge beehive notes (honey, mead, beeswax). Very fruity as well – first ripe banana, melon and apricot, then moving to crispier oranges. Hints of praline, coconut and dried flowers. Great nose, very thick and honeyed. Mouth: gentle and elegant. Almost completely on honey and oranges (fresh and liqueur). Backbone of malt, medium oak and spices (soft pepper, cinnamon). Nice vanilla, apricot and coconut. Finish: slightly drier, with some tannins and spices, dried oranges and faint nutty notes.</p>
<p>What an excellent, luscious nose! The palate is less unique but certainly high quality. Soon in stores. Around € 150 if I’m not mistaken. Recommended.</p>
<p>Score: <strong><span style="color: #1f9bd8;">92</span><span style="color: #1f9bd8;">/100</span></strong></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.whiskynotes.be/2011/strathmill/strathmill-1974-daily-dram/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Glenury Royal 1973 (TWA &amp; The Nectar)</title>
		<link>http://www.whiskynotes.be/2011/glenury-royal/glenury-royal-1973-twa-nectar/</link>
		<comments>http://www.whiskynotes.be/2011/glenury-royal/glenury-royal-1973-twa-nectar/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Jun 2011 06:01:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ruben</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Glenury Royal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[1973]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[37yo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[highlands]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[the nectar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[whisky agency]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.whiskynotes.be/2011/glenury-royal/glenury-royal-1973-whisky-agency/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Glenury Royal 37 yo 1973 (43%, The Whisky Agency &#038; The Nectar 2011, bourbon hogshead, 146 btl.) - 91/100]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>At the <a href="http://www.whiskynotes.be/2011/whisky-news/whisky-fair-limburg/">Limburg festival</a>, <strong>The Whisky Agency</strong> presented a whole line of joint bottlings with <strong>The Nectar</strong>, which is probably our biggest Belgian importer and the company behind the <strong>Daily Dram</strong> range.</p>
<p>There&#8217;s a Caol Ila 1979, Glenlossie 1975, Longmorn 1973, Tomatin 1966, Glen Keith 1970, Highland Park 1975 and this Glenury Royal 1975. All pretty great.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<h1><img style="background-image: none; margin: 0px 10px 10px 70px; padding-left: 0px; padding-right: 0px; display: inline; float: right; padding-top: 0px; border-width: 0px;" title="Glenury Royal 1973 - Whisky Agency" src="http://www.whiskynotes.be/upload/Glenury-Royal-1973-Whisky-Agency_9EA5/TWA_bottle.jpg" alt="Glenury Royal 1973 - Whisky Agency" width="76" height="320" align="right" border="0" />Glenury Royal 37 yo 1973 (43%,<br />
The Whisky Agency &amp; The Nectar 2011, bourbon hogshead, 146 btl.)</h1>
<p>Nose: honeyed nose with apple pie and caramelized sugar. Baked pear, raisins, apricots. Maybe a little papaya. Some nutty notes. Hay. Soft spices (cinnamon, mint). Nicely mellow and “antique” at the same time. Mouth: a bit too soft, but smooth and juicy, showing mainly oranges, both fresh and candied. Pears as well. Developing a spicy side (mint, clove, aniseed) and tobacco which makes it quite oriental. Honey. Some resinous oak and herbal tea. Faint paraffin notes. Finish: not too long, but nicely minty with a bit of drying oak.</p>
<p>Very good whisky, but quite expensive: around € 240 while last year’s Glenury Royal 1973 from the same bottler was only € 180.</p>
<p>Score: <strong><span style="color: #1f9bd8;">91</span><span style="color: #1f9bd8;">/100</span></strong></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.whiskynotes.be/2011/glenury-royal/glenury-royal-1973-twa-nectar/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Glenlivet 1972 (Whisky Agency)</title>
		<link>http://www.whiskynotes.be/2011/glenlivet-2/glenlivet-1972-whisky-agency/</link>
		<comments>http://www.whiskynotes.be/2011/glenlivet-2/glenlivet-1972-whisky-agency/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Apr 2011 07:22:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ruben</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Glenlivet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[1972]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[37yo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[glenlivet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[perfect dram]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Speyside]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[the whisky agency]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.whiskynotes.be/2011/glenlivet-2/glenlivet-whisky-agency/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Glenlivet 37 yo 1972 (56,8%, The Whisky Agency - Perfect Dram III 2009, bourbon hogshead, 141 btl.) - 87/100]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>At the “televoting tasting” of last week, this <strong>Glenlivet 1972</strong> (sorry:<br />
<strong><span style="text-decoration: underline;">The</span> Glenlivet</strong>) bottled by The Whisky Agency didn’t get into the top-3, but it was still one of the highlights of the evening.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<h1><img style="background-image: none; margin: 15px 15px 10px 50px; padding-left: 0px; padding-right: 0px; display: inline; float: right; padding-top: 0px; border: 0px;" title="Glenlivet 1972 Whisky Agency" src="http://www.whiskynotes.be/upload/Glenlivet-Whisky-Agency_C8F2/Untitled-1.jpg" border="0" alt="Glenlivet 1972 Whisky Agency" width="63" height="320" align="right" />Glenlivet 37 yo 1972 (56,8%, The Whisky<br />
Agency &#8211; Perfect Dram III 2009,<br />
bourbon hogshead, 141 btl.)</h1>
<p>Nose: a rather spirity and grainy start. Folds open with floral notes, pollen and stewed fruits, but overall it keeps hovering around malty aromas. Citrus and apricot jam. A little vanilla and oak polish. Liquorice. Soft spices. Traces of wet limestone. Mouth: intense and very spicy. Still a generous amount of cereal notes. Ripe fruits (pineapple, gooseberries). Slightly bitter tangerine. Vanilla. Almonds. Some grassy notes. Finish: medium length, slightly hot with oak and spices, especially pepper.</p>
<p>This Glenlivet is surely a nice old Speysider, but it failed to impress me as much as it seemed to impress other people. It’s really complex though, and very coherent. A few drops of water take away some of the rough edges by the way. Sold out.</p>
<p>Score: <strong><span style="color: #1f9bd8;">87</span><span style="color: #1f9bd8;">/100</span></strong></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.whiskynotes.be/2011/glenlivet-2/glenlivet-1972-whisky-agency/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Miltonduff 1971 (DT Lonach)</title>
		<link>http://www.whiskynotes.be/2011/miltonduff/miltonduff-1971-lonach/</link>
		<comments>http://www.whiskynotes.be/2011/miltonduff/miltonduff-1971-lonach/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Feb 2011 07:37:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ruben</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Miltonduff]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[1971]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[37yo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[40%]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[duncan taylor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lonach]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Speyside]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.whiskynotes.be/?p=6453</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Miltonduff 37 yo 1971 (40%, Duncan Taylor Lonach 2008) - 92/100]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Although the name <strong>Miltonduff</strong> is not heard often as a single malt, it is a high-capacity distillery and considered the most important component of the Ballantine’s blend. It’s one of the key plants in the Chivas / Pernod Ricard group. <a href="http://www.whiskynotes.be/tag/gordon-mcphail/">Gordon &amp; MacPhail</a> has semi-official bottlings of Miltonduff such as a regular 10 years old.</p>
<p>As you know, the <strong>Lonach</strong> series by Duncan Taylor blends one or more underproof casks with stronger sister casks to reach the required 40% limit. As the result is still cask strength, it&#8217;s much richer than a cask that has been diluted to the same 40%.</p>
<p><br class="spacer_" /></p>
<h1><img style="background-image: none; margin: 15px 35px 20px 10px; padding-left: 0px; padding-right: 0px; display: inline; float: left; padding-top: 0px; border: 0px;" title="Miltonduff 1971 37y Lonach" src="http://www.whiskynotes.be/upload/Miltonduff-1971-DT-Lonach_13720/Untitled-1.jpg" border="0" alt="Miltonduff 1971 37y Lonach" width="125" height="307" align="left" />Miltonduff 37 yo 1971  <br />
(40%, Duncan Taylor Lonach 2008)</h1>
<p>Nose: beautiful round Speyside elements. Very sophisticated. Big vanilla, some very sweet pineapple, banana and lovely hints of marshmallows! Some honey. Orange gums and cinnamon. Polished oak. Mouth: light but not too soft. Again quite a sweet profile with yellow apples and citrus candy. Pollen and honey. A fair amount of spices from the oak (soft pepper, cinnamon). Some sawdust towards the end. Finish: medium long, on barley sugars, oranges and oak.</p>
<p>This Miltonduff is simply a succulent Speyside whisky. It’s a bit reticent maybe, but very warm and I adore those marshmallow notes! If only <br />
I could find a bottle somewhere. It was around <br />
€ 120 at the time.</p>
<p>Score: <strong><span style="color: #1f9bd8;">92/100</span></strong></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.whiskynotes.be/2011/miltonduff/miltonduff-1971-lonach/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>8</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Glen Grant 1973 (Thosop)</title>
		<link>http://www.whiskynotes.be/2010/glen-grant/glen-grant-1973-thosop/</link>
		<comments>http://www.whiskynotes.be/2010/glen-grant/glen-grant-1973-thosop/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Sep 2010 08:04:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ruben</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Glen Grant]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[1973]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[37yo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[46%]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sherry cask]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Speyside]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[thosop]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.whiskynotes.be/2010/glen-grant/glen-grant-1973-thosop/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Glen Grant 37 yo 1973 (46%, Thosop 2010, sherry butt, 120 btl.) - 88/100]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sometimes whisky releases seem to come in waves. Certain vintages are highly sought after by independent bottlers, certainly after the success of similar expressions. After the Glen Grant 1972 that won the MM Awards 2009, we’ve seen other bottlings trying to match this quality.</p>
<p>This <strong>Glen Grant 1973</strong> was bottled by Thosop – I’ll compare it to a slightly older Glen Grant 1972 tomorrow, bottled by Whisky-Doris. Both were matured in (refill) sherry casks.  <br class="spacer_" /></p>
<p><br class="spacer_" /></p>
<h1><img style="margin: 0px 10px 10px 55px; display: inline; border: 0px;" title="Glen Grant 1973 Thosop" src="http://www.whiskynotes.be/upload/GlenGrant1973Thosop_14107/thosop_bottle.jpg" border="0" alt="Glen Grant 1973 Thosop" width="68" height="307" align="right" /> Glen Grant 37 yo 1973 <br />
(46%, Thosop 2010, sherry butt, 120 btl.)</h1>
<p>Nose: very seductive with silky fruit notes and delicate oak polish. Ripe gooseberries, kumquats, lime and a little honeysuckle. Undertones of dried apricots from the sherry cask. A nutty / moccha layer as well. Fresh and maybe a tad shy at 46%, although it unfolds nicely over time. Water adds soft waxy notes. Mouth: rich fruity notes with lots of added spices this time (nutmeg, a little pepper and cinnamon). A whole array of oranges, tangerines, a little grapefruit and apricot. Mouth: long, fruity / spicy with faint moccha.</p>
<p>A classic Glen Grant: fruity and balanced, with gentle spices and a subtle sherry influence. Around € 140.</p>
<p>Score: <strong><span style="color: #1f9bd8;">88</span></strong><strong><span style="color: #1f9bd8;">/100</span></strong></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.whiskynotes.be/2010/glen-grant/glen-grant-1973-thosop/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Glen Scotia 1972 (Malts of Scotland)</title>
		<link>http://www.whiskynotes.be/2010/glen-scotia/glen-scotia-1972-malts-of-scotland/</link>
		<comments>http://www.whiskynotes.be/2010/glen-scotia/glen-scotia-1972-malts-of-scotland/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Jun 2010 07:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ruben</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Glen Scotia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[1972]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[37yo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[45.1%]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Belgium]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[campbeltown]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[malts of scotland]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.whiskynotes.be/2010/glen-scotia/glen-scotia-1972-malts-of-scotland/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Glen Scotia 37 yo 1972 (45,1%, Malts of Scotland 2010, cask #1926, 197 btl.) - 91/100]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This <strong>Glen Scotia</strong> is one of the two <strong>Malts of Scotland</strong> bottlings that were bottled exclusively for Belgium (the other one being a Glengoyne 1973). A sister cask #1931 (45,7%) is available in other countries.</p>
<p>Glen Scotia is rare, and a 37 years old Glen Scotia is even rarer. It was matured in a bourbon hogshead.</p>
<h1> </h1>
<h1><img style="margin: 0px 50px 0px 0px; display: inline; border-width: 0px;" title="Glen Scotia 1972 MoS" src="http://www.whiskynotes.be/upload/GlenScotia1972MaltsofScotland_C0ED/Untitled2.jpg" border="0" alt="Glen Scotia 1972 MoS" width="109" height="333" align="left" /> Glen Scotia 37 yo 1972 (45,1%, Malts of Scotland 2010, cask #1926, 197 btl.)</h1>
<p>Nose: great start on nice notes of dried fruits (figs especially, also apricots) and gentle waxy / beehive notes. Yellow apples. Old white wine. There’s also a mustiness but a very nice one, kind of an old library smell. Old roses. Warm polished oak. A very light ashy undertone and faint hints of menthol. Ginger tea. This could have been the nose of an old-style Springbank. Really good. Mouth: a slightly bitter attack, perfect strength, with dried fruits, a bit of sour wood and hints of tequila. Walnut skin. Resin. Liquorice. It fades with a soft honeyed touch. Finish: a bit short and surprisingly coastal, with hints of salt water.</p>
<p>This Glen Scotia is definitely from another universe than the <a href="http://www.whiskynotes.be/2010/glen-scotia/glen-scotia-1992-malts-of-scotland/">Glen Scotia 1992</a> but they share the attribute of not being a beginners whisky.</p>
<p><br class="spacer_" /></p>
<p>The nose is really high-class and probably the closest we can get to the old Campbeltown style nowadays. The palate had to grow on me: at first I thought it was a little austere and harsh (I scored it 88) but after a second tasting it became clear this is quite special and more complex. This should have been in my WWWF 2010 highlights. Around € 190.</p>
<p>Score: <strong><span style="color: #1f9bd8;">91/100</span></strong></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.whiskynotes.be/2010/glen-scotia/glen-scotia-1972-malts-of-scotland/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Glengoyne 1972 (Nectar of the Daily Drams)</title>
		<link>http://www.whiskynotes.be/2010/glengoyne/glengoyne-1972-daily-dram/</link>
		<comments>http://www.whiskynotes.be/2010/glengoyne/glengoyne-1972-daily-dram/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 May 2010 07:45:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ruben</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Glengoyne]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[1972]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[37yo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[52%]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[daily dram]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[highlands]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[the nectar]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.whiskynotes.be/2010/glengoyne/glengoyne-1972-nectar-of-the-daily-drams/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Glengoyne 37 yo 1972 (52%, Nectar of the Daily Drams 2010) - 91/100]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We’ve seen an unusual amount of independent <strong>Glengoyne 1972</strong> releases lately. It started with the <a href="http://www.whiskynotes.be/2009/glengoyne/glengoyne-1972-malts-of-scotland/">Glengoyne 1972 bottled by Malts of Scotland</a>, then a second bottling from the same cask, a bottling by Jack Wiebers, one by The Whisky Agency and now this Glengoyne 1972 by <a href="http://www.whiskynotes.be/2010/whisky-news/daily-dram/">The Bottler Formerly Known As Daily Dram</a>. There have been great <a href="http://www.whiskynotes.be/2009/glengoyne/glengoyne-1973-malts-of-scotland/">1973 Glengoynes</a> as well by the way.</p>
<p>It would have been interesting to have them all in a direct comparison, but for now it’s just this Daily Dram vs. the Malts of Scotland version.</p>
<h1>&#160;</h1>
<h1><img style="background-image: none; border-bottom: 0px; border-left: 0px; margin: 40px 10px 10px 45px; padding-left: 0px; padding-right: 0px; display: inline; float: right; border-top: 0px; border-right: 0px; padding-top: 0px" title="Glengoyne 1972 37y Daily Dram" border="0" alt="Glengoyne 1972 37y Daily Dram" align="right" src="http://www.whiskynotes.be/upload/Glengoyne-1972-Nectar-of-the-Daily-Drams_83B6/GGODDM1972.jpg" width="76" height="347" />Glengoyne 37 yo 1972     <br />(52%, Nectar of the Daily Drams 2010)</h1>
<p>Nose: very fruity with tangerine, lemon, pineapple and hints of strawberries. A bit of mint. Very tropical and honeyed. Obviously in line with the Malts of Scotland version, but maybe a tiny bit fruitier, with a higher degree of vanilla. Less oaky spices as well. I prefer this Daily Dram version for having a wider array of flavours, but it’s close. Mouth: an oily attack, fruity with a pleasant acidity. The pineapple and honey are supported by more spices (ginger and cloves) and hints of resinous oak, but less so than in the Malts of Scotland release. Very nice integration. Water brings out soft coconut and some dried prunes. Slightly grassy aftertaste. Finish: long, spicy and drier.</p>
<p>An admirable Glengoyne with a delicious fruitiness and well balanced oak influence. I have a slight preference for this one over the 1972 Malts of Scotland version, although the differences are small. The lower price makes it even more interesting: around € 145. Recommended.</p>
<p>Score: <strong><span style="color: #1f9bd8">91/100</span></strong></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.whiskynotes.be/2010/glengoyne/glengoyne-1972-daily-dram/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Clynelish 37yo (TWE 10th Anniversary)</title>
		<link>http://www.whiskynotes.be/2010/clynelish/clynelish-37yo-twe-10th-anniversary/</link>
		<comments>http://www.whiskynotes.be/2010/clynelish/clynelish-37yo-twe-10th-anniversary/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 May 2010 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ruben</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Clynelish]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[1972]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[37yo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[46%]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[the whisky exchange]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TWE]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.whiskynotes.be/2010/clynelish/clynelish-37yo-twe-10th-anniversary/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Clynelish 37 yo (46%, The Whisky Exchange 10th Anniversary 2009) - 92/100]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img style="margin: 0px 0px 0px 10px; display: inline; border-width: 0px;" title="The Whisky Exchange 10th Anniversary" src="http://www.whiskynotes.be/upload/Clynelish37yoTWE10thAnniversary_A456/Untitled1.jpg" border="0" alt="The Whisky Exchange 10th Anniversary" width="110" height="110" align="right" /> The 10th Anniversary of <strong>The Whisky Exchange</strong> in London has brought us a series of rare Anniversary whiskies. We’ve already reviewed an excellent <a href="http://www.whiskynotes.be/2009/longmorn/longmorn-1969-for-twe/">Longmorn 1969/2009</a> and now it’s time for a <strong>37 years old Clynelish</strong>. They don’t mention it on the bottle, but there’s a high chance that this was distilled in 1972 because there have been mostly 1972 and 1992 bottlings in their Single Malts of Scotland range. Around 200 bottles have been bottled.</p>
<h1> </h1>
<h1><img style="margin: 20px 45px 60px 0px; display: inline; border-width: 0px;" title="Clynelish 37yo TWE" src="http://www.whiskynotes.be/upload/Clynelish37yoTWE10thAnniversary_A456/CLYTWE37YO.jpg" border="0" alt="Clynelish 37yo TWE" width="82" height="333" align="left" /> Clynelish 37 yo (46%, The Whisky Exchange 10th Anniversary 2009)</h1>
<p>Nose: beautiful start on beeswax and honey. Very fruity, with a basket of fresh tropical fruits (mango, pineapple) and more indigenous fruit (pear, orange, tangerine). Haribo bears. Lovely paraffin. Vanilla. Whiffs of oak spices to top it off (cinnamon and light pepper). A little olive oil and camphor. I don’t like to use the word ‘perfect’ but this is close! Mouth: a bit more resinous now. Still fruity (orange, peach, banana) but less exhuberant. Some Turkish delight. Hints of smoke and dust. In the end it shows ginger and a slightly salty hint of liquorice. Finish: very long and waxy with hints of orange skin and resinous dry oak.</p>
<p>Compared to the recent wave of <a href="http://www.whiskynotes.be/2010/clynelish/clynelish-1982-malts-of-scotland/">1982 Clynelish</a>, this is oakier (of course), with more citrus and a more delicate profile. There have been some questions about the fact that it was diluted to 46% instead of earlier cask strength releases, but I can confirm that the end result is a good mix of complexity and drinkability. One to cherish! Available from <a href="http://www.thewhiskyexchange.com/P-11592.aspx" target="_blank">TWE</a>. Around € 175.</p>
<p>Score: <strong><span style="color: #1f9bd8;">92/100</span></strong></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.whiskynotes.be/2010/clynelish/clynelish-37yo-twe-10th-anniversary/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Longmorn 1972 (Whisky Agency)</title>
		<link>http://www.whiskynotes.be/2010/longmorn/longmorn-1972-whisky-agency/</link>
		<comments>http://www.whiskynotes.be/2010/longmorn/longmorn-1972-whisky-agency/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Apr 2010 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ruben</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Longmorn]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[1972]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[37yo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[51.3%]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[perfect dram]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sherry cask]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Speyside]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[whisky agency]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.whiskynotes.be/2010/longmorn/longmorn-1972-whisky-agency/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Longmorn 37 yo 1972 (51,3%, Whisky Agency &#038; Three Rivers Tokyo 2010, Perfect Dram IV, 231 btl.) - 95/100]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This 37 years old <strong>Longmorn 1972,</strong> bottled by <a href="http://www.whiskynotes.be/tag/the-whisky-agency/">Whisky Agency</a> in their <strong>Perfect Dram IV</strong> series, is the ideal sparring partner for yesterday’s <a href="http://www.whiskynotes.be/2010/longmorn/longmorn-1972-gm-lmdw/">Longmorn 1972 by La Maison du Whisky</a>.</p>
<h1>&#160;</h1>
<h1><img style="background-image: none; border-bottom: 0px; border-left: 0px; margin: 40px 40px 55px 10px; padding-left: 0px; padding-right: 0px; display: inline; float: left; border-top: 0px; border-right: 0px; padding-top: 0px" title="Longmorn 1972 Perfect Dram" border="0" alt="Longmorn 1972 Perfect Dram" align="left" src="http://www.whiskynotes.be/upload/Longmorn-1972-Whisky-Agency_A9C0/Untitled-1.jpg" width="76" height="347" />Longmorn 37 yo 1972 (51,3%,     <br />Whisky Agency &amp; Three Rivers Tokyo 2010, Perfect Dram IV, 231 btl.)</h1>
<p>Nose: superb refill sherry – it shares a lot of influences with the LMdW bottling, but it’s definitely more elegant. The fruity side is bigger (mostly tangerine, banana and mango) and there are more flowery notes (violets and rosewater with some dry flowers). Big hints of furniture polish and cake. More almonds. Rum &amp; raisins. A delicate whiff of peppermint. The heavy sherry of the LMdW bottling made place for a more fragrant and more complex profile with a better balance. No smoke in this one. Water brings out more red fruit (lovely redcurrant) and amplifies the flowers. Really outstanding. Mouth: very rich with lots of red fruits but also apples and apricot marmalade. Leather. Hints of tea yet never dry.    <br />A bit of water makes it even more juicy with fresh figs and lush forest fruits. Finish: very long. The oak is easy to notice but it’s not nearly as invading as in the LMdW.</p>
<p>This Longmorn is exactly how I like my sherry bottlings! One of the best sherried whiskies I’ve come across lately, so “Perfect dram” may well be the truth! Around € 185, but sold out in most places. Too bad I didn&#8217;t discover it a bit earlier, because this is a jewel&#8230;</p>
<p>Score: <strong><span style="color: #1f9bd8">95/100</span></strong></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.whiskynotes.be/2010/longmorn/longmorn-1972-whisky-agency/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>13</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>GlenDronach 1972 (cask #705 for LMdW)</title>
		<link>http://www.whiskynotes.be/2010/glendronach/glendronach-1972-cask-705-lmdw/</link>
		<comments>http://www.whiskynotes.be/2010/glendronach/glendronach-1972-cask-705-lmdw/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 31 Jan 2010 23:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ruben</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[GlenDronach]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[1972]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[37yo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[53.3%]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LMdW]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[malt maniacs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[oloroso]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[single cask]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Speyside]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.whiskynotes.be/2010/glendronach/glendronach-1972-cask-705-for-lmdw/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[GlenDronach 37 yo 1972 (53,3%, OB 2009 for LMdW, oloroso cask #705, 399 btl.) - 89/100]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In the 2009 series of <strong>GlenDronach</strong> single casks, the <a href="http://www.whiskynotes.be/2009/glendronach/glendronach-1972-single-cask-719/">GlenDronach 1972 cask #719</a> was my favourite (in fact, it was one of the best bottlings I&#8217;ve tasted last year). A few months later, this sister cask #705 was bottled for <strong>La Maison du Whisky</strong> and won the <a href="http://www.whiskynotes.be/2010/whisky-news/malt-maniacs-awards-2009/">Malt Maniacs award</a> for Best Sherry Cask 2009 in the Ultra premium category.</p>
<p>It’s a 37 year-old, matured in an oloroso sherry butt.</p>
<h1> </h1>
<h1><img style="margin: 15px 0px 10px 45px; display: inline; border: 0px;" title="Glendronach 1972/2009 LMdW 705" src="http://www.whiskynotes.be/upload/GlenDronach1972cask705forLMdW_BBF7/m15339.jpg" border="0" alt="Glendronach 1972/2009 LMdW 705" width="88" height="333" align="right" /> GlenDronach 37 yo 1972 (53,3%, OB 2009 for LMdW, oloroso cask #705, 399 btl.)</h1>
<p>Nose: pretty similar to the markethouse bottling. More red fruits (raspberry rather than blueberry / blackcurrant. Citrus as well (blood orange). Water brings out hints of exotic fruits (papaya, mango). Dark chocolate. Some toasted notes. Less oak polish than the OB. Less farmy notes, more the meaty kind of sherry. Ginger, pepper. The LMdW nose is great but compared directly with the OB, it is slightly less complex and less expressive. Mouth: still those very nice red fruits but they are almost drowned by big waves of resinous notes and mentholated oak. Chocolate coated oranges. Tobacco leaves. Getting  quite tannic and dry with a salty hint of liquorice. Finish: woody and dry but very rich with notes of tangerine and milk chocolate.</p>
<p>I guess 1972 already is a legendary year for GlenDronach, in the same way  BenRiach 1976 are all great. I prefer the original bottling though. Still available from <a href="http://www.whisky.fr/produit-15339-glendronach-1972-53,3-embouteillage-officiel.html" target="_blank">La Maison du Whisky</a> at around € 310.</p>
<p>Score: <strong><span style="color: #1f9bd8;">89/100</span></strong></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.whiskynotes.be/2010/glendronach/glendronach-1972-cask-705-lmdw/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>10</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Glenrothes 1968 (Duncan Taylor)</title>
		<link>http://www.whiskynotes.be/2009/glenrothes/glenrothes-1968-duncan-taylor/</link>
		<comments>http://www.whiskynotes.be/2009/glenrothes/glenrothes-1968-duncan-taylor/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 May 2009 22:00:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ruben</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Glenrothes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[37yo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[57.6%]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[duncan taylor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Glenrothes 1968]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Speyside]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.whiskynotes.be/?p=1103</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Glenrothes 37y 1968 (57,6%, Duncan Taylor 2006, cask #13482, 160 btl.) - 88/100]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Since 2005, <strong>Duncan Taylor</strong> released a bunch of great <a href="http://www.whiskynotes.be/category/glenrothes/">Glenrothes</a> bottlings, distilled in 1968, 1969 and 1970. They all seem to be good, and some are quite excellent.</p>
<p><strong> </strong></p>
<h1><img style="border-bottom: 0px; border-left: 0px; margin: 10px 0px 0px 60px; display: inline; border-top: 0px; border-right: 0px" title="Glenrothes 37yo 1968 DT" src="http://www.whiskynotes.be/upload/Glenrothes1968DuncanTaylor_C127/0010000028829_xl.jpg" border="0" alt="Glenrothes 37yo 1968 DT" width="130" height="373" align="right" />Glenrothes 37y 1968 (57,6%, Duncan Taylor 2006, cask #13482, 160 btl.)</h1>
<p>Nose: quite powerful and typically Speyside. Honey, heather. Slightly floral, even some varnish. Spicy oak. Oranges. Vanilla. There’s also a peppery / minty edge to it. Nice and immediately demonstrative, which is impressive for a whisky that spent almost 40 years in a wooden cask. The oak influence is clearly noticeable in the spices but never overpowering. Mouth: more vanilla and oranges. Some nutmeg, pepper and honey. Citrus. Hints of a creamy banana milkshake. Big oak now (still within the normal limits of its age). Finish: slightly drying, again lots of oak influence. Hints of peaches and chocolate.</p>
<p>A really vivid Glenrothes, even at this age.<br />
Very tasty with good spices. Other 1960’s Glenrothes releases by Duncan Taylor can be found for +/- € 160. This one is sold out.</p>
<p>Score: <strong><span style="color: #1f9bd8">88/100</span></strong></p>
<p><em>Thanks for sharing this bottle, Jorgen!</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.whiskynotes.be/2009/glenrothes/glenrothes-1968-duncan-taylor/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

