<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>WhiskyNotes &#187; highlands</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.whiskynotes.be/tag/highlands/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.whiskynotes.be</link>
	<description>Whisky blog and tasting notes</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 08:29:18 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Clynelish 1997 (Archives)</title>
		<link>http://www.whiskynotes.be/2012/clynelish/clynelish-1997-archives/</link>
		<comments>http://www.whiskynotes.be/2012/clynelish/clynelish-1997-archives/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2012 00:57:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ruben</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Clynelish]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[14yo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[1997]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[53.9%]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[archives]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[highlands]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[whiskybase]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.whiskynotes.be/?p=10772</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Clynelish 14 yo 1997 (53,9%, Archives 2011, bourbon hogshead #4634, 160 btl.) - 85/100]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>By now they’re selling a second batch of <a href="http://www.whiskynotes.be/tag/archives/">Archives</a> releases (Glen Grant 1975 and Dailuaine 1983 among others), but we’re still reviewing one of the Inaugural Releases, a 14 years old <strong>Clynelish 1997</strong>.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<h1><img style="background-image: none; margin: 0px 10px 10px 70px; padding-left: 0px; padding-right: 0px; display: inline; float: right; padding-top: 0px; border: 0px;" title="Clynelish 1997 Archives" src="http://www.whiskynotes.be/upload/Caol-Ila-1997-Archives_E903/Untitled-1.png" alt="Clynelish 1997 Archives" width="68" height="320" align="right" border="0" />Clynelish 14 yo 1997 (53,9%, Archives 2011, bourbon hogshead #4634, 160 btl.)</h1>
<p>Nose: a slightly austere Clynelish which starts on linseed oil, flints and wax, followed by light fruity notes (lemon skin, apple) and some flowery hints. A very mineral profile. Mouth: sharp and pretty mineral again. Apples again and big zesty lemon (homemade limoncello without the sugar). Hints of tonic water. Grows more austere with grassy notes, ginger and salt. A tad too raw for my taste. Finish: medium long, clean, sharp and zesty.</p>
<p>Young Clynelish that’s behaving more like a lemon brandy. Around € 65. Available from the <a href="http://shop.whiskybase.com/whiskyview.php?whiskyid=25066" target="_blank">Whiskybase shop</a>.</p>
<p>Score: <strong><span style="color: #1f9bd8;">85/</span><span style="color: #1f9bd8;">100</span></strong></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.whiskynotes.be/2012/clynelish/clynelish-1997-archives/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Ardmore 1992 (The Whiskyman)</title>
		<link>http://www.whiskynotes.be/2012/ardmore/ardmore-1992-the-whiskyman/</link>
		<comments>http://www.whiskynotes.be/2012/ardmore/ardmore-1992-the-whiskyman/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Jan 2012 02:55:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ruben</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Ardmore]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[1992]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[20yo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[49.9%]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ardmore]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[highlands]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[whiskyman]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.whiskynotes.be/?p=10719</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Ardmore 20 yo 1992 ‘Peat fighting man’ (49,9%, The Whiskyman 2012, 146 btl.) - 90/100]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You may remember we had a wave of <strong>Ardmore 1992</strong> releases last year (by <a href="http://www.whiskynotes.be/2011/ardmore/ardmore-1992-malts-of-scotland/">Malts of Scotland</a> and <a href="http://www.whiskynotes.be/2011/ardmore/ardmore-1992-daily-dram/">Daily Dram</a> among others). Now <a href="http://www.whiskynotes.be/tag/whiskyman/">The Whiskyman</a> has one in its series with the 1970&#8242;s-style label.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<h1><img style="margin: 20px 0px 10px 50px; border: 0px currentColor; padding-top: 0px; padding-right: 0px; padding-left: 0px; display: inline; background-image: none;" title="Ardmore 1992 Whiskyman" src="http://www.whiskynotes.be/upload/Ardmore-1992-The-Whiskyman_CAEA/TWA_bottle_clean.jpg" alt="Ardmore 1992 Whiskyman" width="77" height="320" align="right" border="0" />Ardmore 20 yo 1992 ‘Peat fighting man’<br />
(49,9%, The Whiskyman 2012, 146 btl.)</h1>
<p>Nose: starts earthy, mineral and slightly sooty but after a while this is nicely balanced by rounder, fruity notes. Seville oranges. The longer you wait, the more it becomes (tropically) fruity, with great papaya / banana notes. Some oils, maybe even a hint of diesel. All very lovely and perfectly integrated. Mouth: very smooth with sweet smoke, peat (subtle peat, think old Ardbeg) and yellow apple. Almonds. After that, there’s clearly a hint of pink grapefruit and again some tropical hints of passion fruit. Some coastal notes as well. Very nice. Finish: long, rather sweet again. Almonds and soft smoke.</p>
<p>It seems some of these Ardmores show potential to bring back some old-style Ardbeg / Brora with balanced peat and a nice fruitiness. This one’s my favourite so far, but be sure to give it enough time to unfold its complexity. Around € 85. On its way to stores.</p>
<p>Score: <strong><span style="color: #1f9bd8;">90/</span><span style="color: #1f9bd8;">100</span></strong></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.whiskynotes.be/2012/ardmore/ardmore-1992-the-whiskyman/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Tomatin 1976 (Whisky-Doris)</title>
		<link>http://www.whiskynotes.be/2012/tomatin/tomatin-1976-whisky-doris/</link>
		<comments>http://www.whiskynotes.be/2012/tomatin/tomatin-1976-whisky-doris/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Jan 2012 00:21:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ruben</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Tomatin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[1976]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[34y]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[49.5%]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dark sherry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[highlands]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[whisky-doris]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.whiskynotes.be/?p=10569</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Tomatin 34yo 1976 (49,5%, Whisky-Doris 2011, dark sherry hogshead #9, 139 btl.) - 89/100]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I’ve had a specific tasting request for this one (you’re welcome Stuart) so let’s dive right in and try this recent <strong>Tomatin 1976</strong> bottled by <strong>Whisky-Doris</strong> in Germany.</p>
<p>Note that Whisky-Doris bottlings are now locally available in Holland (Whiskybase) and Belgium (Jurgen&#8217;s Whiskyhuis) which might save you a few bucks on shipping costs.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<h1><img style="margin: 20px 45px 20px 10px; border: 0px currentColor; padding-top: 0px; padding-right: 0px; padding-left: 0px; display: inline; background-image: none;" title="Tomatin 1976 Whisky-Doris" src="http://www.whiskynotes.be/upload/Tomatin-1976-Whisky-Doris_1482D/TWA_bottle_clean.jpg" alt="Tomatin 1976 Whisky-Doris" width="73" height="320" align="left" border="0" />Tomatin 34yo 1976 (49,5%, Whisky-Doris 2011, dark sherry hogshead #9, 139 btl.)</h1>
<p>Nose: not exactly the tropical fruits we’d expected. It’s more sherried with ‘darker’ flavours. Herbal honey and fruits like ripe plums, raisins and blueberries. Overripe melon. Beehive notes. Mint. Some grassy elements, even something remotely earthy after some airing. Mouth: good strength, very sweet and fruity. Almost liqueur-like at some point. Blackberry or forest fruit jam. Prunes. Nicely coated with mint. Some ripe tropical fruits now, but still not as much as others. Then a wave of fresh herbs and oak before it develops some fondant chocolate towards the end. Finish: medium long, with chocolate, fruits and soft oak until the very end.</p>
<p>Maybe not my personal favourite among the Tomatin 1976’s (for being less typical) but still excellent whisky. I suppose it was drawn from a more active sherry cask and this overpowers the more delicate tropical flavours a little. Around € 170.</p>
<p>Score: <strong><span style="color: #1f9bd8;">89</span><span style="color: #1f9bd8;">/100</span></strong></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.whiskynotes.be/2012/tomatin/tomatin-1976-whisky-doris/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Old Pulteney 12 Years</title>
		<link>http://www.whiskynotes.be/2012/old-pulteney/old-pulteney-12-years/</link>
		<comments>http://www.whiskynotes.be/2012/old-pulteney/old-pulteney-12-years/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Jan 2012 08:18:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ruben</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Old Pulteney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[12yo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[40%]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[highlands]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.whiskynotes.be/?p=6694</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Old Pulteney 12 yo (40%, OB 2010) - 78/100]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Old Pulteney 12yo</strong> – the benjamin of the range – is matured wholly in air-dried, hand-selected ex-bourbon casks. Contrary to the more upmarket / single cask Old Pulteney releases, this is still caramel coloured and chill-filtered.</p>
<p>This is the 2010 release &#8211; in 2011 the packaging had a slight makeover. The spirit is probably more or less the same (a new batch I guess).</p>
<p><strong> </strong></p>
<h1><img style="background-image: none; margin: 30px 0px 10px 45px; padding-left: 0px; padding-right: 0px; display: inline; float: right; padding-top: 0px; border: 0px;" title="Old Pulteney 12yo" src="http://www.whiskynotes.be/upload/12yo_12185/Untitled-1.jpg" alt="Old Pulteney 12yo" width="176" height="320" align="right" border="0" />Old Pulteney 12 yo (40%, OB 2010)</h1>
<p>Nose: quite a big maltiness coming out, with some coastal notes and a little brine. Rather big beefy elements as well, which I personally don’t like too much. Also a sharper, walnut-style note. It benefits from a bit of airing in the glass. Mouth:<br />
a bit underpowered. Full of malt, slightly bitter Seville oranges, sourish apple. Liquorice. A dash of honey and quite a lot of caramel / toffee flavours in the end. Caramelized nuts. A bit too much of the caramel flavours for me. Finish: zesty and oily with a slightly herbal and salty ending. Drops dead all of a sudden.</p>
<p>This may not be a special dram, but let’s not forget we’re in the entry level market here. At this price point, it&#8217;s a decent introduction to this uniquely coastal distillery. Around € 30.</p>
<p>Score: <strong><span style="color: #1f9bd8;">78</span><span style="color: #1f9bd8;">/100</span></strong></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.whiskynotes.be/2012/old-pulteney/old-pulteney-12-years/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Clynelish 1989 (Whisky Agency)</title>
		<link>http://www.whiskynotes.be/2012/clynelish/clynelish-1989-moody-lions/</link>
		<comments>http://www.whiskynotes.be/2012/clynelish/clynelish-1989-moody-lions/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Jan 2012 00:17:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ruben</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Clynelish]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[1989]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[22yo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[50.9%]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[highlands]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[moody lions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[whisky agency]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.whiskynotes.be/?p=10430</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Clynelish 22 yo 1989 (50,9%, The Whisky Agency ‘Moody Lions’ 2011, ex-bourbon cask, 267 btl.) - 91/100]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Another bottling in the <a href="http://www.whiskynotes.be/tag/moody-lions/">Moody Lions</a> series by <strong>The Whisky Agency</strong>. I’m sure many people will be interested to find out about this <strong>Clynelish 1989 </strong>- it&#8217;s a vintage that I haven&#8217;t tried before.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<h1><img style="margin: 10px 50px 10px 10px; border: 0px currentColor; padding-top: 0px; padding-right: 0px; padding-left: 0px; display: inline; background-image: none;" title="Clynelish 1989 TWA Moody Lions" src="http://www.whiskynotes.be/upload/dc4d90abcb98_11E03/clynelish.jpg" alt="Clynelish 1989 TWA Moody Lions" width="74" height="333" align="left" border="0" />Clynelish 22 yo 1989 (50,9%, The Whisky Agency ‘Moody Lions’ 2011, ex-bourbon cask, 267 btl.)</h1>
<p>Nose: quite a typical Clynelish with ripe fruits (caramelized apple, melons), waxy notes and something herbal / leafy in the background. Some buttery notes as well, more than we’re used to find. Folds open nicely with more beeswax and spices. Very warm with few mineral / coastal notes. Clynelish fans will love it. Mouth: creamy and punchy, sweet with some adorable fruity notes and again a certain buttery quality. Peach jam with vanilla and soft spices. Mirabelles and apples. Some heather honey. Vanilla pudding. Softly bitter grassy notes in the end. All in all a rather rounded version. Finish: long and warming, still high on fruits with some almonds and refreshing mint.</p>
<p>A beautiful Clynelish with some excellent juicy and creamy elements. Recommended, certainly because it’s not too expensive. Around € 120.</p>
<p>Score: <strong><span style="color: #1f9bd8;">91</span><span style="color: #1f9bd8;">/100</span></strong></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.whiskynotes.be/2012/clynelish/clynelish-1989-moody-lions/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>GlenDronach 1972 (cask #712)</title>
		<link>http://www.whiskynotes.be/2011/glendronach/glendronach-1972-cask-712/</link>
		<comments>http://www.whiskynotes.be/2011/glendronach/glendronach-1972-cask-712/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 Dec 2011 01:20:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ruben</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[GlenDronach]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[1972]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[39yo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[49.9%]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[highlands]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[oloroso]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[single cask]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.whiskynotes.be/?p=10411</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[GlenDronach 39 yo 1972 (49,9%, OB 2011, oloroso cask #712, 466 btl.) - 93/100]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I’ve saved this <strong>GlenDronach 1972</strong> as the last review of 2011. You all know it was the big winner at the recent <a href="http://www.whiskynotes.be/2011/whisky-news/maltmaniacs-awards-2011/">Malt Maniacs Awards</a> and I’ve enjoyed many GlenDronach single casks before. Let’s hope it comes close to the <a href="http://www.whiskynotes.be/2009/glendronach/glendronach-1972-single-cask-719/">GlenDronach 1972 single cask #719</a>.</p>
<p><em>Happy New Year everyone!</em></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<h1><img style="margin: 40px 40px 40px 10px; border: 0px currentColor; padding-top: 0px; padding-right: 0px; padding-left: 0px; display: inline; background-image: none;" title="GlenDronach 1972 cask 712" src="http://www.whiskynotes.be/upload/GlenDronach-1972-cask-712_CA27/GRNOB_1972V5.jpg" alt="GlenDronach 1972 cask 712" width="129" height="320" align="left" border="0" />GlenDronach 39 yo 1972 (49,9%, OB 2011, oloroso cask #712, 466 btl.)</h1>
<p>Nose: strikingly fresh and floral – the first thing I get are lovely roses and passion fruit ganache. A nice addition to the usual raisins, dried berries, cocoa and leather we were expecting already. Raspberries and redcurrant jam. Cherry plums. Big oak polish. Hints of mint. Underneath is a layer of darker aromas, blackberries and something vaguely meaty with a hint of clean gunpowder. While I’m usually struggling with these notes, they are so tiny I’d say it’s an asset. Simply excellent: very wide, luscious and juicy. Mouth: starts in a classic way, with Christmas cake, dates, sultanas… Rather dry with a velvety mouthfeel. After a few moments, a wave of superb tropical notes comes rolling in. Tangerine, guava, passion fruits again. As if they poured a few litres of BenRiach 1976 in the cask. Wow! It doesn’t last too long though, it returns nicely on chocolate, liquorice and very soft spices. Tiny hints of camphor / mint. Finish: very long, still a tad fruity but it’s mostly leather and spices now.</p>
<p>What a great dram to round off this year. It definitely needs time to open up and unfold the deep, almost oriental fruitiness that was hidden in the first few sips. For me this deserves a bonus point, I’ve rarely seen sherry and tropical fruits combined so beautifully, not even in other GlenDronach single casks. I’m stunned Serge chooses a GlenDronach 15yo (WF92) over this masterpiece (WF91). Around € 380, still available in some places. Many thanks for the sample swap, Mars!</p>
<p>Score: <strong><span style="color: #1f9bd8;">93</span><span style="color: #1f9bd8;">/100</span></strong></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.whiskynotes.be/2011/glendronach/glendronach-1972-cask-712/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Glencadam 1974 (Whisky-Fässle)</title>
		<link>http://www.whiskynotes.be/2011/glencadam/glencadam-1974-whiskyfassle/</link>
		<comments>http://www.whiskynotes.be/2011/glencadam/glencadam-1974-whiskyfassle/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Nov 2011 01:14:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ruben</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Glencadam]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[1974]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[37yo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[41.5%]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[highlands]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Whisky-Fässle]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[whiskybase]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.whiskynotes.be/2011/glencadam/glencadam-1974-whisky-fssle/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Glencadam 37 yo 1974 (41,5%, Whisky-Fässle 2011, refill sherry, joint bottling with Whiskybase) - 90/100]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The team behind <a href="http://whiskybase.com/" target="_blank">Whiskybase.com</a> have now started their own shop in Rotterdam (NL). Of course they’re bottling proprietary releases (labeled <strong>Archives</strong>, we’ll focus on that later) but they’re also bringing a few interesting independent bottlers to Holland. Mainly German bottlers like <a href="http://www.whiskynotes.be/tag/alambic-classique/">Alambic Classique</a>, <a href="http://www.whiskynotes.be/tag/whisky-doris/">Whisky-Doris</a> and <a href="http://www.whiskynotes.be/tag/whisky-fassle/">Whisky-Fässle</a> as well as others like Silver Seal.</p>
<p>A good reason to try this <strong>Glencadam 1974</strong>, a joint bottling between Whisky-Fässle and Whiskybase.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<h1><img style="background-image: none; margin: 0px 50px 10px 15px; padding-left: 0px; padding-right: 0px; display: inline; float: left; padding-top: 0px; border: 0px;" title="Glencadam 1974 (Whisky-Fässle + Whiskybase)" src="http://www.whiskynotes.be/upload/Glencadam-1974-Whisky-Fssle_AB38/25577.jpg" alt="Glencadam 1974" width="71" height="320" align="left" border="0" />Glencadam 37 yo 1974 (41,5%,<br />
Whisky-Fässle 2011, refill sherry,<br />
joint bottling with Whiskybase)</h1>
<p>Nose: complex and refined. A slightly subdued fruity layer (orange, tangerine, maybe guava) with additional layers of dried flowers and soft herbs (lovage), a leathery / oily touch and  faint hints of mocha. Subtle oak as well. More delicately sherried than last year’s <a href="http://www.whiskynotes.be/2010/glencadam/glencadam-1974-malts-of-scotland/">Malts of Scotland release</a>. Mouth: not extremely powerful (no surprise) but pleasant. Fruity notes (oranges), a little ginger and hints of herbal tea. Leather notes and oak. Finish: similar flavours. Medium long, nicely balanced and not too dry.</p>
<p>Not a flavour bomb, but still an excellent balance and pleasant ‘oldness’. A great example of this overlooked distillery. Around € 155.</p>
<p>Score: <strong><span style="color: #1f9bd8;">90</span><span style="color: #1f9bd8;">/100</span></strong></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.whiskynotes.be/2011/glencadam/glencadam-1974-whiskyfassle/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Clynelish 1982 (Malts of Scotland)</title>
		<link>http://www.whiskynotes.be/2011/clynelish/clynelish-1982-malts-of-scotland-2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.whiskynotes.be/2011/clynelish/clynelish-1982-malts-of-scotland-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Nov 2011 01:19:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ruben</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Clynelish]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[1982]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[28yo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[53.7%]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[highlands]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[malts of scotland]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.whiskynotes.be/2011/clynelish/clynelish-1982-malts-of-scotland-2/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Clynelish 28 yo 1982 (53,7%, Malts of Scotland 2011, MoS 11015, 275 btl.) - 91/100]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A direct comparison this time. The <a href="http://www.whiskynotes.be/2011/clynelish/clynelish-1982-single-malts-of-scotland/">Clynelish 1982 by Single Malts of Scotland</a> against this version by <strong>Malts of Scotland</strong>. This one has an impressive strength of 53,7%, let’s see if the added punch alters the delicate <strong>Clynelish</strong> profile.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<h1><img style="background-image: none; margin: 40px 0px 20px 40px; padding-left: 0px; padding-right: 0px; display: inline; float: right; padding-top: 0px; border-width: 0px;" title="Clynelish 1982 Malts of Scotland" src="http://www.whiskynotes.be/upload/Clynelish-1982-Malts-of-Scotland_E70F/15400.jpg" alt="Clynelish 1982 Malts of Scotland" width="120" height="320" align="right" border="0" />Clynelish 28 yo 1982 (53,7%, Malts of Scotland 2011, MoS 11015, 275 btl.)</h1>
<p>Nose: a lot punchier than the SMOS cask. More green banana. A tad more oak as well although that may be part of the higher strength. A lot of honeydew melon and beeswax (warm and honeyed compared to the sharper oiliness of the SMOS). Walnut liqueur. Apples with cinnamon. Some biscuity notes. Guimauves (the white ones). Great nose. Mouth: punchy again. Key components are vanilla and grapefruit this time, with some peppery notes. Hints of sweet almonds. Less complex and slightly less convincing than the nose, but still a nice whisky. Lemon zest and a slight coastal edge towards the end. Finish: long and elegant, zesty at first but coming back to a fruity sweetness.</p>
<p>For me this is the better Clynelish of the two, especially on the nose, although you could say they’re two different kinds of whisky alltogether (this one showing a slightly more 1970&#8242;s character). A little more expensive: around € 125.</p>
<p>Score: <strong><span style="color: #1f9bd8;">91</span><span style="color: #1f9bd8;">/100</span></strong></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.whiskynotes.be/2011/clynelish/clynelish-1982-malts-of-scotland-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Clynelish 1982 (Single Malts of Scotland)</title>
		<link>http://www.whiskynotes.be/2011/clynelish/clynelish-1982-single-malts-of-scotland/</link>
		<comments>http://www.whiskynotes.be/2011/clynelish/clynelish-1982-single-malts-of-scotland/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Nov 2011 01:11:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ruben</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Clynelish]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[1982]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[28yo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[43.1%]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[highlands]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SMOS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[the whisky exchange]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[whisky show]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.whiskynotes.be/2011/clynelish/clynelish-1982-single-malts-of-scotland/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Clynelish 28 yo 1982 (43,1%, Single Malts of Scotland 2011, hogshead #3985, 175 btl.) - 89/100]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This <strong>Clynelish</strong> was distilled 15 December 1982 and bottled in September 2011 for The Whisky Show in London in the <a href="http://www.whiskynotes.be/tag/smos/">Single Malts of Scotland</a> range.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<h1><img style="background-image: none; margin: 20px 10px 10px 50px; padding-left: 0px; padding-right: 0px; display: inline; float: right; padding-top: 0px; border: 0px;" title="Clynelish 1982 - Single Malts of Scotland" src="http://www.whiskynotes.be/upload/Clynelish-1982-Malts-of-Scotland_DF74/CLYSDL1982.jpg" alt="Clynelish 1982 - Single Malts of Scotland" width="71" height="320" align="right" border="0" />Clynelish 28 yo 1982 (43,1%, Single Malts of Scotland 2011, hogshead #3985, 175 btl.)</h1>
<p>Nose: delicate and mellow, even a little inexpressive at first. After a while it opens up with a juicy fruitiness (lime, yellow apple, white peach, something Albariño-esque), typical waxy notes (paraffin, lemon candles) and flinty notes in the background. Soft hints of vanilla. Faint grassy notes. Very nice but the strength makes you work harder to get the aromas. Mouth: waxy and citrusy (grapefruit, lemon). A few mineral touches. A bit more oaky dryness now, with hints of fruit tea. It seems too delicate to completely withstand the wood. Finish: waxy, lemony and faintly bitterish. Medium long.</p>
<p>Too bad this one was really soft. It&#8217;s great as long as you don&#8217;t compare it to similar Clynelish. I’ve had better ones, with just as much fruits, more punch and a better balance with the oak. Around € 110. Temporarily out of stock on the TWE website, but more is expected at the beginning of December.</p>
<p>Score: <strong><span style="color: #1f9bd8;">89</span><span style="color: #1f9bd8;">/100</span></strong></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.whiskynotes.be/2011/clynelish/clynelish-1982-single-malts-of-scotland/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Glen Garioch 1971 (Whisky Exchange)</title>
		<link>http://www.whiskynotes.be/2011/glen-garioch/glen-garioch-1971-whisky-exchange/</link>
		<comments>http://www.whiskynotes.be/2011/glen-garioch/glen-garioch-1971-whisky-exchange/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Nov 2011 00:47:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ruben</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Glen Garioch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[1971]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[43.9%]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[highlands]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[single cask]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TWE]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[whisky show]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.whiskynotes.be/2011/glen-garioch/glen-garioch-1971-whisky-exchange/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Glen Garioch 1971 (43,9%, OB for The Whisky Exchange 2011, cask #2038, 194 btl.) - 91/100]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This <strong>Glen Garioch 1971 </strong>is an official single cask bottled for The Whisky Exchange and released at The Whisky Show in 2011. I’ve been <a href="http://www.whiskynotes.be/2010/glen-garioch/glen-garioch-1971-for-taiwan/">impressed by this vintage before</a>, so I’m really looking forward to it.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<h1><img style="margin: 60px 0px 40px 40px; border: 0px currentColor; padding-top: 0px; padding-right: 0px; padding-left: 0px; display: inline; background-image: none;" title="Glen Garioch 1971 TWE Whisky Show" src="http://www.whiskynotes.be/upload/Glen-Garioch-1971-Whisky-Exchange_F134/GGROB_1971.jpg" alt="Glen Garioch 1971 TWE Whisky Show" width="164" height="320" align="right" border="0" />Glen Garioch 1971 (43,9%, OB for The Whisky Exchange 2011, cask #2038, 194 btl.)</h1>
<p>Nose: gentle but also very complex. First there’s a discreet and slightly tropical fruitiness (passion fruit, grapefruit) mixed with fresh eucalyptus, hay and a velvety, sooty smokiness and soft peat. Quite some leather, wax and mineral notes. Wet leaves. A smooth and worthy 1971. Mouth: not extremely punchy but quite boldly peated for a Glen Garioch (closer to Port Ellen than Brora for instance). Hints of mustard cress and bitter oranges, as well as some sourish oak juices that are a little too prominent maybe. Heather. Lapsang tea. Liquorice. A little austere although there are traces of sweeter citrus fruits. Finish: very long with plenty of sooty peat, liquorice and bitter oranges.</p>
<p>With its relatively heavy peat, waxy nose and a slightly austere and mustardy palate, this comes really close to the late 1970’s – early 1980’s Brora profile in my opinion. You have to like this style and spend a lot of money though. Available from <a href="http://www.thewhiskyexchange.com/P-15039.aspx" target="_blank">TWE</a> for around € 470.</p>
<p>Score: <strong><span style="color: #1f9bd8;">91</span><span style="color: #1f9bd8;">/100</span></strong></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.whiskynotes.be/2011/glen-garioch/glen-garioch-1971-whisky-exchange/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Brora 32 years old (2011)</title>
		<link>http://www.whiskynotes.be/2011/brora/brora-32-years-2011/</link>
		<comments>http://www.whiskynotes.be/2011/brora/brora-32-years-2011/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Nov 2011 00:13:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ruben</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Brora]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[32yo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[54.7%]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[highlands]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[special releases]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.whiskynotes.be/2011/brora/brora-32-years-old-2011/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Brora 32 yo (54,7%, OB 2011, refill American oak &#038; refill European oak, 10th Annual release, 1500 btl.) - 94/100]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img style="background-image: none; margin: 15px 0px 20px 20px; padding-left: 0px; padding-right: 0px; display: inline; float: right; padding-top: 0px; border-width: 0px;" title="brora" src="http://www.whiskynotes.be/upload/Brora_B386/brora.jpg" alt="Brora" width="120" height="87" align="right" border="0" />On Monday I wrote that I felt a little disappointed by the new <strong>Brora 32 years </strong>(part of the <a href="http://www.whiskynotes.be/2011/whisky-news/diageo-special-releases-2011/">Diageo Special Releases 2011</a>). I sniffed the glass at the festival and took a little sip. The disappointment was mostly because of the emphasis on mineral notes (typical for 1980&#8242;s Brora i.e. most independent releases) and the lack of farmy notes (typical for the 1970&#8242;s).</p>
<p>But you know how it goes, there&#8217;s not enough time and festivals don&#8217;t offer the right atmosphere for an in-depth tasting of complex whiskies, so I decided to take home the rest of my glass. Here’s the true assessment.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s from refill both American and European oak casks. Also, for the first time Brora is bottled as an official <strong>32 years</strong> old while it used to be 30 years. I&#8217;ve been told stocks are running really low and there would only be one more release after this one, a <strong>Brora 40 years old</strong>.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<h1><img style="background-image: none; margin: 60px 40px 30px 0px; padding-left: 0px; padding-right: 0px; display: inline; float: left; padding-top: 0px; border-width: 0px;" title="Brora 32 years (2011 release)" src="http://www.whiskynotes.be/upload/Brora_B386/BROOB_1978.jpg" alt="Brora 32 years (2011 release)" width="133" height="300" align="left" border="0" />Brora 32 yo (54,7%, OB 2011, refill American oak &amp; refill European oak, 10th Annual release, 1500 btl.)</h1>
<p>Nose: mineral and dusty, even a little raw at first. Wet stones and cardboard. Then some ashes and coal. A pinch of salt. This is as far as I got at the festival, but after fifteen minutes a bunch of other layers start to come out. Nice tobacco. Quite some yellow apple, peach and vanilla as well (fruity / biscuity notes, in high quantities for a Brora). Wax. More smoke and aha… farmyard! Maybe not the smell of goat stables and manure of earlier releases but still a good deal of stable hay and wet animals. A little mint / eucalyptus as well. High class! Mouth: much sweeter than expected. Tangerine, almonds, condensed milk, something caramelly even. Still rather peppery and slightly mustardy. Still plenty of peat and coal. Some leather. Going back and forth between sharper notes and sweeter notes. A fair amount of oak too. Nicely returning to pastry flavours in the end. Finish: medium long and drying, with faint peat and ashes. Again a hint of mint in the aftertaste.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>After having spent more time with it, I take back my first opinion. It needs time due to its impressive complexity, but this is not at all a disappointment – it’s much better than the last few years. Although there are some quirky elements (very sweet attack, only moderate farminess), overall it’s excellent. Too bad it costs around € 350 (it&#8217;s kinda worth it though &#8211; just look at today&#8217;s prices of earlier releases). Brora enthusiasts should seriously consider this one.</p>
<p>Score: <strong><span style="color: #1f9bd8;">94</span><span style="color: #1f9bd8;">/100</span></strong></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.whiskynotes.be/2011/brora/brora-32-years-2011/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Clynelish 1997 (The Whiskyman)</title>
		<link>http://www.whiskynotes.be/2011/clynelish/clynelish-1997-whiskyman/</link>
		<comments>http://www.whiskynotes.be/2011/clynelish/clynelish-1997-whiskyman/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Nov 2011 01:48:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ruben</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Clynelish]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[14yo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[1997]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[50.5%]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dominiek bouckaert]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[highlands]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[whiskyman]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.whiskynotes.be/2011/clynelish/clynelish-1997-the-whiskyman/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Clynelish 14 yo 1997 'All you need is whisky' (50,5%, The Whiskyman 2011, ex-bourbon, 160 btl.) - 89/100]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Dominiek Bouckaert</strong> is distributing <a href="http://www.whiskynotes.be/tag/malts-of-scotland/">Malts of Scotland</a> in Belgium, he’s running the <a href="http://www.whiskynotes.be/tag/thosop/">Thosop handwritten</a> releases and since a couple of months he launches casks in his own series <strong>The Whiskyman</strong>.</p>
<p>This Clynelish 1997 is the fourth release in this series already. Time to review a few others in the near future.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<h1><img style="background-image: none; margin: 0px 10px 10px 50px; padding-left: 0px; padding-right: 0px; display: inline; float: right; padding-top: 0px; border: 0px;" title="Clynelish 1997 - The Whiskyman" src="http://www.whiskynotes.be/upload/Clynelish-1997-The-Whiskyman_149FF/TWA_bottle_clean.jpg" alt="Clynelish 1997 - The Whiskyman" width="74" height="320" align="right" border="0" />Clynelish 14 yo 1997 &#8216;All you need is whisky&#8217; (50,5%, The Whiskyman 2011, ex-bourbon, 160 btl.)</h1>
<p>Nose: fruity and fragrant. A lot of juicy pear and gooseberry aromas. A little sweet oak and vanilla. Creamy banana. Lime candy. Very seductive, the usual mineral / waxy notes are certainly there, but they’re wrapped in a sweetness. Very nice. Mouth: oily and quite sweet again, with some pineapple sweets and apple / pear. Lime and grapefruit. Punchy and much spicier than the nose suggested (ginger and nutmeg). Some oak shavings and waxy notes. Finish: half fruity, half spicy with the trademark wax.</p>
<p>Great young Clynelish, especially the nose is spectacular for such a youngster. Better than the similar <a href="http://www.whiskynotes.be/2011/clynelish/clynelish-1997-the-whisky-fair/">Whisky Fair bottling</a> but also a little more expensive. Around € 65.</p>
<p>Score: <strong><span style="color: #1f9bd8;">89</span><span style="color: #1f9bd8;">/100</span></strong></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.whiskynotes.be/2011/clynelish/clynelish-1997-whiskyman/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Clynelish 1998 (Liquid Library)</title>
		<link>http://www.whiskynotes.be/2011/clynelish/clynelish-1998-liquid-library/</link>
		<comments>http://www.whiskynotes.be/2011/clynelish/clynelish-1998-liquid-library/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Nov 2011 08:23:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ruben</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Clynelish]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[13yo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[1998]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[51.7%]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[highlands]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[liquid library]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[whisky agency]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.whiskynotes.be/2011/clynelish/clynelish-1998-liquid-library/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Clynelish 13yo 1998 (51,7%, The Whisky Agency ‘Liquid Library’ 2011, ex-bourbon hogshead, 214 btl.) - 83/100]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.whiskynotes.be/tag/liquid-library/">Liquid Library</a> is a range of accessible daily drams by The Whisky Agency. This 13 years old <strong>Clynelish</strong> is one of the latest additions to the series.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<h1><img style="background-image: none; margin: 0px 10px 10px 60px; padding-left: 0px; padding-right: 0px; display: inline; float: right; padding-top: 0px; border-width: 0px;" title="Clynelish 1998 Liquid Library" src="http://www.whiskynotes.be/upload/Clynelish-1998_FC6F/TWA_bottle_clean.jpg" alt="Clynelish 1998 Liquid Library" width="68" height="320" align="right" border="0" />Clynelish 13yo 1998 (51,7%, The Whisky Agency ‘Liquid Library’ 2011, ex-bourbon hogshead, 214 btl.)</h1>
<p>Nose: starts a bit musty and mossy, hiding the usual Clynelish vibrance. Leather notes. With some water it seems to find its character, with apple peelings and a little paraffin. Still not the freshest Clynelish. Mouth: sweeter and fruitier now, with very nice pear drops, oranges and almond notes. No obvious waxy notes on the palate. Quite some leather again, a hint of rounded oak and very soft spices. Not very different after adding some water. Finish: medium long, quite fruity. Faint grassy notes as well.</p>
<p>Not the most typical Clynelish in my book, but decent drinking whisky nonetheless. Around € 65.</p>
<p>Score: <strong><span style="color: #1f9bd8;">83</span><span style="color: #1f9bd8;">/100</span></strong></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.whiskynotes.be/2011/clynelish/clynelish-1998-liquid-library/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Ben Nevis 1992 (cask #2623)</title>
		<link>http://www.whiskynotes.be/2011/ben-nevis/ben-nevis-1992-cask-2623/</link>
		<comments>http://www.whiskynotes.be/2011/ben-nevis/ben-nevis-1992-cask-2623/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Oct 2011 06:41:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ruben</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Ben Nevis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[14yo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[1992]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[highlands]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sherry cask]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[single cask]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.whiskynotes.be/2011/ben-nevis/ben-nevis-1992-cask-2623/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Ben Nevis 14 yo 1992 (46%, OB 2007, sherry cask #2623, 815 btl.) - 87/100]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here&#8217;s the 14 years old <strong>Ben Nevis 1992</strong> I tried in <a href="http://www.whiskynotes.be/2011/whisky-bars/whisky-bar-the-glengarry/">The Glengarry</a> last week-end. I’ve bought a bottle myself a few weeks ago so I was happy to be able to try it.</p>
<p>This Ben Nevis was matured in a sherry cask for 13 years, then watered down, then further matured for one year and finally bottled at 46%. On the label they call this “double maturation”.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<h1><img style="background-image: none; margin: 0px 10px 10px 50px; padding-left: 0px; padding-right: 0px; display: inline; float: right; padding-top: 0px; border: 0px;" title="Ben Nevis 1992 cask 2623" src="http://www.whiskynotes.be/upload/Ben-Nevis-1992-cask-2623_F1AB/BNVOB_1992V1.jpg" alt="Ben Nevis 1992 cask 2623" width="81" height="320" align="right" border="0" />Ben Nevis 14 yo 1992<br />
(46%, OB 2007, sherry cask #2623, 815 btl.)</h1>
<p>Nose: starts a little sharp and not as sherried as I had hoped. Plenty of orange peel, liquorice and some mineral notes, even a few coastal hints. It takes a while, but it opens up nicely with rounder chocolate and nutty notes. Some leather. Soft herbs. Mouth: good strength, with more sherry notes now. Sweet raisins, kumquats, chocolate. Orange liqueur. Hints of ginger. Something delicately smoky in the background. Still a surprising coastal hint. Finish: medium long on rounded sherry, spices and a bit of wood.</p>
<p>Not an easy one to describe or score. Don’t be fooled by the first impression – it takes a very long time to display its full potential. Around € 100 if you can still find a bottle.</p>
<p>Score: <strong><span style="color: #1f9bd8;">87</span><span style="color: #1f9bd8;">/100</span></strong></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.whiskynotes.be/2011/ben-nevis/ben-nevis-1992-cask-2623/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>7</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>GlenDronach 1971 (cask #1436)</title>
		<link>http://www.whiskynotes.be/2011/glendronach/glendronach-1971-cask-1436/</link>
		<comments>http://www.whiskynotes.be/2011/glendronach/glendronach-1971-cask-1436/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Oct 2011 00:21:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ruben</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[GlenDronach]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[1971]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[40yo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[48.5%]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[highlands]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pedro ximenez]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[single cask]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.whiskynotes.be/2011/glendronach/glendronach-1971-cask-1436/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[GlenDronach 40 yo 1971 (48,5%, OB 2011, PX sherry puncheon #1436, 583 btl.) - 83/100]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When I tried most of the fourth batch of <a href="http://www.whiskynotes.be/tag/glendronach/">GlenDronach</a> single casks a couple of weeks ago, I went on and forgot to publish the review of this <strong>GlenDronach 1971 cask #1436</strong>.</p>
<p>Actually I didn’t completely forget, but I felt a little unimpressed with this year’s single casks. Let’s hope they still have some great casks lying around, because upping the price each year and lowering the quality doesn’t make much sense.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<h1><img style="background-image: none; margin: 40px 40px 30px 0px; padding-left: 0px; padding-right: 0px; display: inline; float: left; padding-top: 0px; border: 0px;" title="GlenDronach 1971 cask 1436" src="http://www.whiskynotes.be/upload/GlenDronach-1971_DFDE/GRNOB_1971V3.jpg" alt="GlenDronach 1971 cask 1436" width="144" height="320" align="left" border="0" />GlenDronach 40 yo 1971<br />
(48,5%, OB 2011, PX sherry puncheon #1436, 583 btl.)</h1>
<p>Nose: meaty start with some gravy notes and Oxo. Dark crispy bacon. Dried fruits as well (blackberry jam) but none of the fresh fruitiness that we’ve seen in previous 1971 and (especially) 1972 casks. If you wait long enough, there are some nice tobacco notes, roasted nuts and moccha. Disappointing in terms of freshness and complexity. Mouth: perfect drinking strength but an unusual mixture of sharp, slightly vinegary notes and dark, sticky plums, with nothing in between. A little incoherent and too sweet I’m afraid – think actual PX sherry or Greek raisin syrup. After that it becomes spicier (pepper), nuttier but woodier as well. Finish: dry, with walnuts and the return of tobacco notes.</p>
<p>A collector’s item maybe, but not the most rewarding GlenDronach for whisky drinkers in my opinion. Around € 450, still readily available.</p>
<p>Score: <strong><span style="color: #1f9bd8;">83</span><span style="color: #1f9bd8;">/100</span></strong></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.whiskynotes.be/2011/glendronach/glendronach-1971-cask-1436/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>11</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Clynelish 1972 (SMWS 26.33)</title>
		<link>http://www.whiskynotes.be/2011/clynelish/clynelish-1972-smws/</link>
		<comments>http://www.whiskynotes.be/2011/clynelish/clynelish-1972-smws/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Oct 2011 00:58:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ruben</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Clynelish]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[1972]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[26.33]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[31yo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[57.8%]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[highlands]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SMWS]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.whiskynotes.be/2011/clynelish/clynelish-1972-smws-26-33/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Clynelish 31 yo 1972 (57,8%, SMWS 2004, 26.33) - 92/100]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This Clynelish 1972 was nicknamed “Friar’s balsam and cigar boxes” by the <strong>Scotch Malt Whisky Society</strong>. It was bottled in 2004 at 31 years of age.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<h1></h1>
<h1><img style="background-image: none; margin: 0px 10px 10px 40px; padding-left: 0px; padding-right: 0px; display: inline; float: right; padding-top: 0px;" title="Clynelish 1972 SMWS 26.33" src="http://www.whiskynotes.be/upload/Clynelish-1972-SMWS-26.33_F89A/7791.jpg" alt="Clynelish 1972 SMWS 26.33" width="71" height="320" align="right" border="0" />Clynelish 31 yo 1972 (57,8%, SMWS 2004, 26.33)</h1>
<p>Nose: lovely fruit in generous quantities… mango, pineapple sweets, kumquat, apricot. The expected beehive notes as well: honey, beeswax and balm, light pollen. Buttercups and honeysuckle. And a faint minerality / austerity, maybe even a phenolic note, in the background. After some time: soft cedar oak – cigar boxes indeed. Mouth: fruity marmalade and citrus with more spicy notes now (ginger and pepper). Orange zest and lemon oil. Leathery notes. Pepper. The peaty edge  is more pronounced (still very soft though) which makes it a little more austere than on the nose. Mineral notes again. Finish: long, still beautifully fruity. Orange cake and spices.</p>
<p>Very, very high quality, but we couldn’t expect any less from Clynelish 1972 of course. Long gone. Thanks Dominiek.</p>
<p>Score: <strong><span style="color: #1f9bd8;">92</span><span style="color: #1f9bd8;">/100</span></strong></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.whiskynotes.be/2011/clynelish/clynelish-1972-smws/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>GlenDronach 1991 (cask #3181)</title>
		<link>http://www.whiskynotes.be/2011/glendronach/glendronach-1991-cask-3181/</link>
		<comments>http://www.whiskynotes.be/2011/glendronach/glendronach-1991-cask-3181/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Sep 2011 00:02:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ruben</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[GlenDronach]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[1991]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[19yo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[50.4%]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[highlands]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LMdW]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pedro ximenez]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[single cask]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[the nectar]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.whiskynotes.be/?p=9233</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[GlenDronach 19 yo 1991 (50,4%, OB 2011, Pedro Ximenez sherry puncheon #3181, 624 btl.) - 88/100]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This <strong>GlenDronach</strong> single cask is not part of the 4th batch. Half of it was bottled for <strong>The Nectar</strong> a couple of months ago. The rest went to <strong>La Maison du Whisky</strong>. The bottle says “PX sherry puncheon” while the GlenDronach website claims it was an oloroso butt.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<h1></h1>
<h1><img style="background-image: none; margin: 15px 40px 20px 10px; padding-left: 0px; padding-right: 0px; display: inline; float: left; padding-top: 0px; border: 0px;" title="GlenDronach 1991 cask 3181" src="http://www.whiskynotes.be/upload/GlenDronach-1991_13DDE/m16125.png" alt="GlenDronach 1991 - The Nectar / LMdW" width="75" height="320" align="left" border="0" />GlenDronach 19 yo 1991 (50,4%, OB for The Nectar &amp; LMdW 2011, Pedro Ximenez sherry puncheon #3181, 624 btl.)</h1>
<p>Nose: nice sherry, powerful and round. Dried fruits, some nutty notes. Very polished with some waxed furniture, similar to the great <a href="http://www.whiskynotes.be/2011/glendronach/glendronach-1992-cask-161/">GlenDronach 1992 cask #161</a> in that respect. Blackberry jam and figs, maybe even some black cherries. Sparkling top notes of orange liqueur and mint as well. Rum &amp; raisins. Plenty of good sherry associations. Mouth: rather oily, not really thick or powerful. Starts on dried fruits again, with some added herbal notes and polished oak. Plums. Cocoa. Not extremely complex, but very pleasant. Nice gingerbread and aniseed in the end. Finish: quite long, a little drier, with some tobacco now and some oak and spices.</p>
<p>This cask was a safe choice. It has a few nice touches (oak polish, gingerbread) while remaining within the “classic” profile everyone has come to expect from GlenDronach single casks. Around € 105.</p>
<p>Score: <strong><span style="color: #1f9bd8;">88</span><span style="color: #1f9bd8;">/100</span></strong></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.whiskynotes.be/2011/glendronach/glendronach-1991-cask-3181/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>GlenDronach 1994 (cask #97)</title>
		<link>http://www.whiskynotes.be/2011/glendronach/glendronach-1994-cask-97/</link>
		<comments>http://www.whiskynotes.be/2011/glendronach/glendronach-1994-cask-97/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Sep 2011 00:14:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ruben</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[GlenDronach]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[17yo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[1994]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[60.1%]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[highlands]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[oloroso]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[single cask]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.whiskynotes.be/2011/glendronach/glendronach-1994-cask-97/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[GlenDronach 17 yo 1994 (60,1%, OB 2011, oloroso butt #97, 617 btl.) - 77/100]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This 1994 is the youngest whisky in GlenDronach’s fourth batch of single casks. Last year I was surprised by the <a href="http://www.whiskynotes.be/2010/glendronach/glendronach-1993-cask-529/">GlenDronach 1993 cask #529</a> which was too dirty for my taste…</p>
<h1></h1>
<h1><img style="background-image: none; margin: 50px 0px 10px 40px; padding-left: 0px; padding-right: 0px; display: inline; float: right; padding-top: 0px; border: 0px;" title="GlenDronach 1994 cask 97" src="http://www.whiskynotes.be/upload/2a2d21beda8d_EE81/GRNOB_1994V1.jpg" alt="GlenDronach 1994 cask 97" width="143" height="320" align="right" border="0" />GlenDronach 17 yo 1994 (60,1%, OB 2011, oloroso butt #97, 617 btl.)</h1>
<p>Nose: similar. Very mushroomy start, with lots of caramel. Some vegetal and meaty notes (oxo). Lots of roasted hazelnuts. Caramel again. Adding water doesn’t help this slightly sulphury profile, on the contrary. Not my type of whisky, although I want to repeat that these notes can be temporary and letting the bottle breathe for a couple of months can make them disappear. Some pear syrup in the background as well. Mouth: sweet at first, but quickly overtaken by spices and herbs (cloves, pepper, liquorice). Then a wave of wood and dark chocolate. Dry and nutty aftertaste. Water does help on the palate, making it rounder and slightly more fruity. Finish: quite dry and quite long with spices and wood.</p>
<p>I can’t really recommend this one, unless you’re familiar with this style and like your sherry a little dirty. Around € 100.</p>
<p>Score: <strong><span style="color: #1f9bd8;">77</span><span style="color: #1f9bd8;">/100</span></strong></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.whiskynotes.be/2011/glendronach/glendronach-1994-cask-97/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>GlenDronach 1992 (cask #161)</title>
		<link>http://www.whiskynotes.be/2011/glendronach/glendronach-1992-cask-161/</link>
		<comments>http://www.whiskynotes.be/2011/glendronach/glendronach-1992-cask-161/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Sep 2011 05:28:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ruben</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[GlenDronach]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[1992]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[19yo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[59.2%]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[highlands]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[oloroso]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.whiskynotes.be/2011/glendronach/glendronach-1992-cask-161/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[GlenDronach 19 yo 1992 (59,2%, OB 2011, oloroso butt #161, 500 btl.) - 90/100]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In this little series of the fourth batch of single casks, here&#8217;s one of the younger casks, the <strong>GlenDronach 1992 cask #161.</strong></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<h1><img style="margin: 40px 40px 60px 0px; border: 0px currentColor; padding-top: 0px; padding-right: 0px; padding-left: 0px; display: inline; background-image: none;" title="GlenDronach 1992 cask 161" src="http://www.whiskynotes.be/upload/GlenDronach-1992-cask-161_F0AD/glendronach_161.jpg" alt="GlenDronach 1992 cask 161" width="113" height="320" align="left" border="0" />GlenDronach 19 yo 1992 (59,2%, OB 2011, oloroso butt #161, 500 btl.)</h1>
<p>Nose: a more pronounced version. It has some lovely polished oak and nutty aromas. A little heather honey. Natural caramel. Kirsch and raspberry liqueur. Hints of bread crust. Silky vanilla and almond paste too. There’s a subtle herbal / earthy side as well which makes it stand out. All of this on the expected background of dried fruits and sultanas. Very good, nicely balanced and more complex than the 1989 and 1990 (just like the sherry I would say – PX can be a little mono-dimensional). Mouth: spicy sherry (cinnamon, pepper) with a nice raspberry / cocoa combo. Sweet and sour. Orange cake. Again a range of herbal flavours. Heather honey. Vanilla and nuts. Pretty great. Finish: long, fading on chocolate and herbs.</p>
<p>A very entertaining cask, with all the expected elements but also a wealth of additional layers. Very attractive. If you’d ask me to recommend one of the more accessible bottles of this batch, this would be the one. Around € 115.</p>
<p>Score: <strong><span style="color: #1f9bd8;">90</span><span style="color: #1f9bd8;">/100</span></strong></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.whiskynotes.be/2011/glendronach/glendronach-1992-cask-161/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>GlenDronach 1990 (cask #1032)</title>
		<link>http://www.whiskynotes.be/2011/glendronach/glendronach-1990-cask-1032/</link>
		<comments>http://www.whiskynotes.be/2011/glendronach/glendronach-1990-cask-1032/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Sep 2011 00:27:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ruben</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[GlenDronach]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[1990]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[20yo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[50.1%]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[highlands]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pedro ximenez]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[single cask]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.whiskynotes.be/2011/glendronach/glendronach-1990-cask-1032/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[GlenDronach 20 yo 1990 (50,1%, OB 2011, PX sherry puncheon #1032, 728 btl.) - 84/100]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Our next <strong>GlenDronach</strong> single cask was filled in 1990. A Pedro Ximénez sherry pucheon just like the <a href="http://www.whiskynotes.be/2011/glendronach/glendronach-1989-cask-2917/">1989 cask #2917</a>.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<h1><img style="background-image: none; margin: 0px 0px 10px 50px; padding-left: 0px; padding-right: 0px; display: inline; float: right; padding-top: 0px; border: 0px;" title="GlenDronach 1990 cask 1032" src="http://www.whiskynotes.be/upload/GlenDronach-1990-cask-1032_F079/glendronach_1032.jpg" alt="GlenDronach 1990 cask 1032" width="111" height="320" align="right" border="0" />GlenDronach 20 yo 1990 (50,1%, OB 2011,<br />
PX sherry puncheon #1032, 728 btl.)</h1>
<p>Nose: this one seems a bit duller and flatter than the 1989. It has more typical, sticky Pedro Ximénez elements with dried fruits and moscovado sugar. Dark polished wood. Some leather. Thick and jammy (blackberry or plum jam). Mouth: sweet cocoa flavours. Almonds and honey. Red fruit candy. Plums. Different types of jam again. Spices are quite delicate, and there’s not a lot of wood. Some sweet tobacco. Sweetness all over actually. Finish: still quite sweet and rounded, medium long.</p>
<p>This 1990 may be a more coherent package than the 1989, but you have to like a sweet and sticky malt. Rather faultless but slightly overdone for me. Around €&nbsp;120.</p>
<p>Score: <strong><span style="color: #1f9bd8;">84</span><span style="color: #1f9bd8;">/100</span></strong></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.whiskynotes.be/2011/glendronach/glendronach-1990-cask-1032/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

