<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>WhiskyNotes &#187; sherry cask</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.whiskynotes.be/tag/sherry-cask/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.whiskynotes.be</link>
	<description>Whisky blog and tasting notes</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 08:29:18 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Glen Grant 1972 (Whisky-Doris)</title>
		<link>http://www.whiskynotes.be/2011/glen-grant/glen-grant-1972-whisky-doris-11395/</link>
		<comments>http://www.whiskynotes.be/2011/glen-grant/glen-grant-1972-whisky-doris-11395/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Dec 2011 23:15:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ruben</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Glen Grant]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[1972]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[39yo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[48%]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sherry cask]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Speyside]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[whisky-doris]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.whiskynotes.be/?p=10371</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Glen Grant 39 yo 1972 (48%, Whisky-Doris 2011, sherry hogshead #11395, 163 btl.) - 92/100]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In the recent wave of <strong>Glen Grant 1972</strong> there’s also this interesting bottle by <strong>Whisky-Doris</strong>. Colour, age, provenance are similar, so let’s hope it’s on the same level as the <a href="http://www.whiskynotes.be/2011/glen-grant/glen-grant-1972-spirits-in-the-sky/">Glen Grant 1972 for Spirits in the Sky</a>.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<h1><img style="background-image: none; margin: 0px 40px 10px 0px; padding-left: 0px; padding-right: 0px; display: inline; float: left; padding-top: 0px; border: 0px;" title="Glen Grant 1972 Whisky-Doris" src="http://www.whiskynotes.be/upload/Glen-Grant-1972-Whisky-Doris_141A8/TWA_bottle_clean.jpg" alt="Glen Grant 1972 Whisky-Doris" width="78" height="320" align="left" border="0" />Glen Grant 39 yo 1972 (48%, Whisky-Doris 2011, sherry hogshead #11395, 163 btl.)</h1>
<p>Nose: This one has less alcohol and indeed it starts more like the Spirits in the Sky version with water. It seems more open – it doesn’t have as much cherry notes but its fruitiness is wider, like a red fruit compote with tropical touches in the background. Leather again. Maybe a little more spices and cocoa. Mouth: smoother but just as fruity and intense. Plums, blackberries, figs, all present. Extra raspberry (nice). Develops on cocoa, almost completely on chocolate in the end. Pretty much perfect strength and nicely supported by the spices without being oaky. Finish: long, sweet. Spices and chocolate.</p>
<p>I don’t have a favourite, both are equally great in my opinion. The lower strength certainly isn’t a downside and it’s 10% cheaper as well. Recommended. Around € 190. Available from <a href="http://www.whisky-doris.de/" target="_blank">Whisky-Doris</a>.</p>
<p>Score: <strong><span style="color: #1f9bd8;">92/</span><span style="color: #1f9bd8;">100</span></strong></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.whiskynotes.be/2011/glen-grant/glen-grant-1972-whisky-doris-11395/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Glen Grant 1972 (Spirits in the Sky)</title>
		<link>http://www.whiskynotes.be/2011/glen-grant/glen-grant-1972-spirits-in-the-sky/</link>
		<comments>http://www.whiskynotes.be/2011/glen-grant/glen-grant-1972-spirits-in-the-sky/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Dec 2011 01:08:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ruben</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Glen Grant]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[1972]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[39yo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[53.2%]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Belgium]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[perfect dram]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sherry cask]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Speyside]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Spirits in the Sky]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[whisky agency]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.whiskynotes.be/?p=10373</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Glen Grant 39 yo 1972 (53,2%, The Whisky Agency ‘Perfect Dram’ 2011, ex-sherry cask, 119 btl.) - 92/100]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is the <strong>Glen Grant 1972</strong> I was talking about last November when a group of people selected it as the <a href="http://www.whiskynotes.be/2011/whisky-news/spirits-in-the-sky-2011/">Spirits in the Sky bottling</a> in a Whisky Agency Masterclass. It arrived in stores last week and I’ve heard sales are roaring.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<h1><img style="background-image: none; margin: 50px 5px 10px 45px; padding-left: 0px; padding-right: 0px; display: inline; float: right; padding-top: 0px; border: 0px;" title="Glen Grant 1972 - TWA Spirits in the Sky" src="http://www.whiskynotes.be/upload/Glen-Grant-1972-Spirits-in-the-Sky_1417E/TWA_bottle_clean.jpg" alt="Glen Grant 1972 - TWA Spirits in the Sky" width="81" height="333" align="right" border="0" />Glen Grant 39 yo 1972 (53,2%,<br />
The Whisky Agency ‘Perfect Dram’ 2011, ex-sherry cask, 119 btl.)</h1>
<p>Nose: big big notes of cherries (dark cherries as well as Portuguese Ginjinha liqueur made from Morello cherries). Lots of dried fruits like figs. Bramble and plums. Dark honey. Precious woods and hints of leather and eucalyptus. Heaps of oriental spices as well (which blend into a kind of incense profile). A drop of water brings out beehive notes and makes the fruits a little more tropical. Just great. Mouth: more oak in the attack, but quickly the fruits take over. Still plenty of cherry notes, plums and mixed red fruit jam, this time combining nicely with a chocolate coating. Fruit cake. Finish: long and elegant, fading on Mon Cherie and soft spices.</p>
<p>This Glen Grant 1972 is clearly more sherried than the MM Awards winning <a href="http://www.whiskynotes.be/2010/glen-grant/glen-grant-1972-whisky-fair/">Glen Grant 1972/2009 by Duncan Taylor</a> or any other (mostly refill sherry) expressions of GG72. The oak is well controlled. A real beauty. Recommended. Around € 210.</p>
<p>Score: <strong><span style="color: #1f9bd8;">92</span><span style="color: #1f9bd8;">/100</span></strong></p>
<p><em>Merry Xmas everyone!</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.whiskynotes.be/2011/glen-grant/glen-grant-1972-spirits-in-the-sky/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Bowmore 1999 (Fulldram)</title>
		<link>http://www.whiskynotes.be/2011/bowmore/bowmore-1999-fulldram/</link>
		<comments>http://www.whiskynotes.be/2011/bowmore/bowmore-1999-fulldram/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Dec 2011 00:06:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ruben</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Bowmore]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[12yo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[1999]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[57.6%]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fulldram]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[islay]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sherry cask]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.whiskynotes.be/?p=10327</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Bowmore 12 yo 1999 (57,6%, Fulldram 2011, oloroso sherry cask, 190 btl.) - 87/100]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img style="background-image: none; margin: 10px 0px 20px 30px; padding-left: 0px; padding-right: 0px; display: inline; float: right; padding-top: 0px; border: 0px;" title="Fulldram whisky label" src="http://www.whiskynotes.be/upload/Bowmore-1999-Fulldram_A70B/FulldramBowmore.jpg" alt="Fulldram whisky label" width="194" height="107" align="right" border="0" />A couple of weeks ago, members of the <a href="http://www.fulldram.be/" target="_blank">Fulldram Whisky Club</a> asked me if I was interested in designing a label for their new bottling, the first one released under their own name. Of course I was looking forward to combine two of my major passions! The result is a minimal design with fairly uncommon proportions.</p>
<p>I’ve just picked up my own bottles of this 12 years old <strong>Bowmore 1999</strong> bottled by <strong>Fulldram </strong>and drawn from an oloroso cask so I’m quite curious to find out how it tastes.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<h1><img style="background-image: none; margin: 40px 40px 60px 10px; padding-left: 0px; padding-right: 0px; display: inline; float: left; padding-top: 0px; border-width: 0px;" title="Bowmore 1999 Fulldram" src="http://www.whiskynotes.be/upload/Bowmore-1999-Fulldram_A70B/fulldram_bottle.jpg" alt="Bowmore 1999 Fulldram" width="79" height="347" align="left" border="0" />Bowmore 12 yo 1999 (57,6%, Fulldram 2011, oloroso sherry cask, 190 btl.)</h1>
<p>Nose: immediately smoky (charcoal) and coastal (seaweed, tarry ropes). Not really a sherry bomb but it does open up nicely with sweeter notes of apples, yellow plums and apricots. Also a wave of yellow raisins and natural caramel. Water even brings out some hints of overripe mango. Some wet hay and chocolate. Strong but beautifully balanced and mouth-watering. Mouth: very powerful with lots of peat, more than we’ve come to expect from Bowmore recently. Strong liquorice / menthol notes (Fisherman’s friend). It takes a while before the hotness fades away and sweeter background notes come forward. Raisins again, hints of berries. Anise. Water makes it a little more rounded, but it stays bold and peaty. Finish: long and coastal, with liquorice and a lingering sweetness.</p>
<p>A good Bowmore which combines powerful Islay flavours with sweeter aromas. I would have liked a tad more roundness on the palate – it’s very peaty so I think it could resist a little more sherry, but given the price (€ 60 for members) it offers very good value for money. If you’re not in the Fulldram whisky club, your best shot at getting it would be <a href="http://www.qvid.be/" target="_blank">QV.ID</a>.</p>
<p>Score: <strong><span style="color: #1f9bd8;">87</span><span style="color: #1f9bd8;">/100</span></strong></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.whiskynotes.be/2011/bowmore/bowmore-1999-fulldram/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Glen Grant 1972 (Private Stock)</title>
		<link>http://www.whiskynotes.be/2011/glen-grant/glen-grant-1972-private-stock/</link>
		<comments>http://www.whiskynotes.be/2011/glen-grant/glen-grant-1972-private-stock/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Nov 2011 23:41:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ruben</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Glen Grant]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[1972]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[51.4%]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[private stock]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sherry cask]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Speyside]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[whisky agency]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.whiskynotes.be/2011/glen-grant/glen-grant-1972-private-stock/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Glen Grant 39 yo 1972 (51,4%, The Whisky Agency ‘Private Stock’ 2011, sherry cask, 87 btl.) - 91/100]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Like its neighbour Caperdonich, 1972 is a great year for <strong>Glen Grant</strong>. Usually Duncan Taylor is one the best sources for this vintage from both distilleries. A couple of great casks have recently been bottled by <strong>The Whisky Agency</strong> as well.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<h1><img style="background-image: none; margin: 30px 10px 30px 45px; padding-left: 0px; padding-right: 0px; display: inline; float: right; padding-top: 0px; border-width: 0px;" title="Glen Grant 1972 Private Stock" src="http://www.whiskynotes.be/upload/Glen-Grant-1972-Private-Stock_DCC4/glengrant.jpg" alt="Glen Grant 1972 Private Stock" width="73" height="347" align="right" border="0" />Glen Grant 39 yo 1972 (51,4%, The Whisky Agency ‘Private Stock’ 2011, sherry cask, 87 btl.)</h1>
<p>Nose: heavenly. Truly heavenly. Lots of fruity sherry notes: dried apricots, dates, prunes and raspberry jam but also more tropical notes of banana liqueur and pineapple. Very jammy, with lots of honey. Hints of vanilla. Big notes of beeswax and pollen. And wonderful oak polish. And milk chocolate. And marshmallows. Simply exquisite. Mouth: very thick again with rich flavours. Fruit jam all over. Creamy chocolate again. Spices, especially nutmeg and mint. There are quite some oak tannins and dry hints of herbal tea, in fact a bit too much for me. I had this at 93/100 at first, but the more I sipped, the more I was bothered by the wood. Finish: long, oaky and spicy, with all kinds of teas.</p>
<p>The nose is near perfect for me. If only it were a little less woody on the palate… I’m thinking the <a href="http://www.whiskynotes.be/2011/whisky-news/spirits-in-the-sky-2011/">Glen Grant 1972 we selected at the Spirits in the Sky festival </a>(to be bottled in the near future) is slightly better in this respect. Around € 230. As often with the Private Stock releases, hard to find (no wonder, only 87 bottles).</p>
<p>Score: <strong><span style="color: #1f9bd8;">91</span><span style="color: #1f9bd8;">/100</span></strong></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.whiskynotes.be/2011/glen-grant/glen-grant-1972-private-stock/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Ben Nevis 1992 (cask #2623)</title>
		<link>http://www.whiskynotes.be/2011/ben-nevis/ben-nevis-1992-cask-2623/</link>
		<comments>http://www.whiskynotes.be/2011/ben-nevis/ben-nevis-1992-cask-2623/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Oct 2011 06:41:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ruben</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Ben Nevis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[14yo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[1992]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[highlands]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sherry cask]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[single cask]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.whiskynotes.be/2011/ben-nevis/ben-nevis-1992-cask-2623/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Ben Nevis 14 yo 1992 (46%, OB 2007, sherry cask #2623, 815 btl.) - 87/100]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here&#8217;s the 14 years old <strong>Ben Nevis 1992</strong> I tried in <a href="http://www.whiskynotes.be/2011/whisky-bars/whisky-bar-the-glengarry/">The Glengarry</a> last week-end. I’ve bought a bottle myself a few weeks ago so I was happy to be able to try it.</p>
<p>This Ben Nevis was matured in a sherry cask for 13 years, then watered down, then further matured for one year and finally bottled at 46%. On the label they call this “double maturation”.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<h1><img style="background-image: none; margin: 0px 10px 10px 50px; padding-left: 0px; padding-right: 0px; display: inline; float: right; padding-top: 0px; border: 0px;" title="Ben Nevis 1992 cask 2623" src="http://www.whiskynotes.be/upload/Ben-Nevis-1992-cask-2623_F1AB/BNVOB_1992V1.jpg" alt="Ben Nevis 1992 cask 2623" width="81" height="320" align="right" border="0" />Ben Nevis 14 yo 1992<br />
(46%, OB 2007, sherry cask #2623, 815 btl.)</h1>
<p>Nose: starts a little sharp and not as sherried as I had hoped. Plenty of orange peel, liquorice and some mineral notes, even a few coastal hints. It takes a while, but it opens up nicely with rounder chocolate and nutty notes. Some leather. Soft herbs. Mouth: good strength, with more sherry notes now. Sweet raisins, kumquats, chocolate. Orange liqueur. Hints of ginger. Something delicately smoky in the background. Still a surprising coastal hint. Finish: medium long on rounded sherry, spices and a bit of wood.</p>
<p>Not an easy one to describe or score. Don’t be fooled by the first impression – it takes a very long time to display its full potential. Around € 100 if you can still find a bottle.</p>
<p>Score: <strong><span style="color: #1f9bd8;">87</span><span style="color: #1f9bd8;">/100</span></strong></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.whiskynotes.be/2011/ben-nevis/ben-nevis-1992-cask-2623/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>7</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Ardbeg 1991 (Malts of Scotland &#8211; Hotel Bero)</title>
		<link>http://www.whiskynotes.be/2011/ardbeg/ardbeg-1991-hotel-bero/</link>
		<comments>http://www.whiskynotes.be/2011/ardbeg/ardbeg-1991-hotel-bero/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Oct 2011 00:45:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ruben</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Ardbeg]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[1991]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[20yo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[48.4%]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Geert Bero]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hotel bero]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[islay]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[malts of scotland]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sherry cask]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.whiskynotes.be/2011/ardbeg/ardbeg-1991-malts-of-scotland-hotel-bero/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Ardbeg 20 yo 1991 (48,4%, Malts of Scotland for Hotel Bero 2011, sherry hogshead #MoS 11003, 240 btl.) - 91/100]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img style="background-image: none; margin: 0px 30px 10px 0px; padding-left: 0px; padding-right: 0px; display: inline; float: left; padding-top: 0px; border: 0px;" title="Hotel Bero - Ardbeg 1991" src="http://www.whiskynotes.be/upload/Ardbeg-1991-for-Hotel-Bero_F861/221631_183019108415511_137044989679590_475462_356501_n.jpg" alt="Hotel Bero - Ardbeg 1991" width="71" height="85" align="left" border="0" />This 20 year-old <strong>Ardbeg </strong>(distilled February 1991) was bottled by Malts of Scotland for <a href="http://www.hotelbero.be/" target="_blank">Hotel Bero</a> in Ostend (owned by Lindores member <strong>Geert Bero</strong> and the location for the Lindores Whisky Fest). Anyone can try it in the hotel bar, but you can only buy a bottle when you are sleeping at the hotel.</p>
<p>It was presented at the <a href="http://www.whiskynotes.be/2011/whisky-news/lindores-whisky-fest-2011/">Lindores Whisky Fest</a> last weekend and I heard some discussions about the price. Many people wondered how a 20 year-old whisky could be worth € 225, but remember sherried Ardbegs are thinly scattered. Douglas Laing released a 1991 refill cask earlier this year and that was rather scandalously priced at € 450. So yes, it is expensive but relatively cheap at the same time. Ardbeg is not selling casks to independent bottlers any more, so I’m afraid the times of affordable medium-aged sherry cask Ardbegs are now officially over!</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<h1><img style="background-image: none; margin: 50px 0px 10px 40px; padding-left: 0px; padding-right: 0px; display: inline; float: right; padding-top: 0px; border: 0px;" title="Ardbeg 1991 Bero Hotel" src="http://www.whiskynotes.be/upload/Ardbeg-1991-for-Hotel-Bero_F861/303954_250119475038807_137044989679590_751851_419913278_n.jpg" alt="Ardbeg 1991 Hotel Bero - Malts of Scotland" width="167" height="307" align="right" border="0" />Ardbeg 20 yo 1991 (48,4%, Malts of Scotland for Hotel Bero 2011, sherry hogshead #MoS 11003, 240 btl.)</h1>
<p>Nose: balanced nose with excellent notes of old ashes and tar on the one hand and rounded, chocolaty notes on the other hand. Sweet almonds and rhubarb compote. Figs. Lovely tobacco leaves. Old leather. Relatively soft iodine and hints of camphor. Complex, not extremely big (which is a good thing &#8211; it&#8217;s not over-sherried nor over-peated) and quite brilliant. Mouth: starts rich and oily with sweet peat smoke. Again some almonds, now mixed with dried fruits and lemon drops. Some herbal notes. The smoke grows stronger, the soft tar shows up again. No brute forces here, it’s all about integrating the different flavours. Finish: long on dried fruits and smoke with a softly coastal edge.</p>
<p>The sherry complements the whisky very well, and the harmonious qualities might actually justify the price in my opinion. Available at the Hotel Bero for € 225.</p>
<p>Score: <strong><span style="color: #1f9bd8;">91</span><span style="color: #1f9bd8;">/100</span></strong></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.whiskynotes.be/2011/ardbeg/ardbeg-1991-hotel-bero/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Port Ellen 1983 (Duncan Taylor cask #674)</title>
		<link>http://www.whiskynotes.be/2011/port-ellen/port-ellen-1983-duncan-taylor-674/</link>
		<comments>http://www.whiskynotes.be/2011/port-ellen/port-ellen-1983-duncan-taylor-674/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Aug 2011 07:46:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ruben</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Port Ellen]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[1983]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[26yo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[54.6%]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[duncan taylor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[islay]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rarest of the rare]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sherry cask]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.whiskynotes.be/?p=6179</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Port Ellen 26 yo 1983 (54,6%, Duncan Taylor Rarest of the Rare 2010, cask #674, 282 btl.) - 93/100]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img style="background-image: none; margin: 0px 0px 10px 50px; padding-left: 0px; padding-right: 0px; display: inline; float: right; padding-top: 0px; border: 0px;" title="Duncan Taylor" src="http://www.whiskynotes.be/upload/Port-Ellen-1983-Duncan-Taylor-cask-674_DC18/v206.jpg" alt="Duncan Taylor" width="120" height="80" align="right" border="0" />I already highlighted this <strong>Port Ellen</strong> at the <a href="http://www.whiskynotes.be/2010/whisky-news/wwwf-2010-report/">Wild West Whisky Fest</a> last year. Now I had the chance to taste it in depth.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<h1><img style="margin: 30px 30px 60px 10px; border: 0px currentColor; padding-top: 0px; padding-right: 0px; padding-left: 0px; display: inline; background-image: none;" title="Port Ellen 1982 Duncan Taylor 674" src="http://www.whiskynotes.be/upload/Port-Ellen-1983-Duncan-Taylor-cask-674_DC18/Untitled-1.jpg" alt="Port Ellen 1982 Duncan Taylor 674" width="131" height="320" align="left" border="0" />Port Ellen 26 yo 1983 (54,6%, Duncan Taylor Rarest of the Rare 2010, cask #674, 282 btl.)</h1>
<p>Nose: hey! Even better than I remembered it. Relatively soft sooty and smokey notes with hints of cured meat. A bunch of sweet notes as well: chocolate ganache, praline and Black Forest gateau! Fruity cherry / mixed red fruits jam. Hints of tobacco with a very delicate medicinal touch. Warm precious wood like rosewood and sandalwood. Few of the sharp / austere notes that you find in other Port Ellen. When compared to <a href="http://www.whiskynotes.be/2010/port-ellen/port-ellen-pe1/">Port Ellen PE1</a> for example, it becomes clear how extremely luscious this is. Just excellent. Mouth: sweet peat and ashes mixed with rounder notes again (cocoa, sweet almonds, berries, figs). A hint of peppermint. Slowly drying towards tobacco. Finish: very long, drier and a little peppery.</p>
<p>An extraordinary Port Ellen with an almost perfect sherried style. If you liked PE1, then you’ll love this. Around € 190. I&#8217;ve spent some time trying to find it, but it seems to be sold out.</p>
<p>Score: <strong><span style="color: #1f9bd8;">93</span><span style="color: #1f9bd8;">/100</span></strong></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.whiskynotes.be/2011/port-ellen/port-ellen-1983-duncan-taylor-674/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Glen Scotia 1992 (A.D. Rattray)</title>
		<link>http://www.whiskynotes.be/2011/glen-scotia/glen-scotia-1992-ad-rattray/</link>
		<comments>http://www.whiskynotes.be/2011/glen-scotia/glen-scotia-1992-ad-rattray/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 31 Jul 2011 22:19:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ruben</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Glen Scotia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[1992]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[59.6%]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[campbeltown]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dewar rattray]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sherry cask]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.whiskynotes.be/2011/glen-scotia/glen-scotia-1992-a-d-rattray/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Glen Scotia 19 yo 1992 (59,6%, A.D. Rattray 2011, sherry butt #2 (part), 359 btl.) - 82/100]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This <strong>Glen Scotia 1992</strong> was distilled in a problematic period. Between 1979 and 1999, this Campbeltown distillery was only operational for 7 years. It is part of the latest series by <strong>A. Dewar Rattray</strong>. It&#8217;s only half of the cask by the way, so we can expect the other half to be bottled on a later moment.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<h1><img style="background-image: none; margin: 45px 0px 10px 50px; padding-left: 0px; padding-right: 0px; display: inline; float: right; padding-top: 0px; border: 0px;" title="Glen Scotia 1992" src="http://www.whiskynotes.be/upload/Glen-Scotia-1992_DE58/GSTDWR1992.jpg" alt="Glen Scotia 1992" width="98" height="320" align="right" border="0" />Glen Scotia 19 yo 1992 (59,6%, A.D. Rattray 2011, sherry butt #2 (part), 359 btl.)</h1>
<p>Nose: a dirty start (some rubber, sulphur and organics) although it gets better after some breathing. Typical huge sherry: dried prunes, blackberry pie, walnuts, raisins… Some roasted malt notes and faint smoke in the background. Leather. Hints of mulchy leaves as well. Mouth: just as sherried. A slightly salty dryness alternates with a herbal sweetness (Ricola bonbons). Dry fruits. Roasted chestnuts and oak. Balsamic syrup. Some nice mocha as well. Plenty of caramel flavours. Reminds me of some 1950-1960’s blends in a way. Finish: quite long and dry, on spices, bitter chocolate and oak.</p>
<p>Difficult to assess, although I think it’s more consistent than the <a href="http://www.whiskynotes.be/2010/glen-scotia/glen-scotia-1992-malts-of-scotland/">Glen Scotia 1992 by Malts of Scotland</a>. You could argue it’s over-sherried with little distillery character left, but if you’re looking for a sherry monster, then it’s quite interesting. Around € 85. Distributed in Belgium by <a href="http://whiskyhuis.be/catalog/whisky-online-bestellen.php" target="_blank">Jurgen&#8217;s Whiskyhuis</a>.</p>
<p>Score: <strong><span style="color: #1f9bd8;">82</span><span style="color: #1f9bd8;">/100</span></strong></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.whiskynotes.be/2011/glen-scotia/glen-scotia-1992-ad-rattray/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Laphroaig 1989 (Douglas Laing Platinum)</title>
		<link>http://www.whiskynotes.be/2011/laphroaig/laphroaig-1989-dl-platinum/</link>
		<comments>http://www.whiskynotes.be/2011/laphroaig/laphroaig-1989-dl-platinum/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Jul 2011 23:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ruben</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Laphroaig]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[1989]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[21yo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[56.9%]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[douglas laing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[islay]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[platinum]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sherry cask]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.whiskynotes.be/2011/laphroaig/laphroaig-1989-dl-platinum/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Laphroaig 21 yo 1989 (56,9%, Douglas Laing Old &#038; Rare Platinum 2010, refill sherry hogshead, 212 btl.) - 88/100]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here’s another sherried <strong>Laphroaig</strong>, distilled March 1989 and bottled last year by <a href="http://www.whiskynotes.be/tag/douglas-laing/">Douglas Laing</a> in the Old &amp; Rare Platinum Selection range. In March 2011 another 1989 cask was bottled in the same series (58,5%).</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<h1><img style="margin: 70px 0px 30px 40px; border: 0px currentColor; padding-top: 0px; padding-right: 0px; padding-left: 0px; display: inline; background-image: none;" title="Laphroaig 1989 Douglas Laing Platinum" src="http://www.whiskynotes.be/upload/Laphroaig-1989-DL-Old--Rare_ED45/LRGDLP1989V1.jpg" alt="Laphroaig 1989 Douglas Laing Platinum" width="153" height="320" align="right" border="0" />Laphroaig 21 yo 1989 (56,9%, Douglas Laing Old &amp; Rare Platinum 2010, refill sherry hogshead, 212 btl.)</h1>
<p>Nose: the tar seems to be a little softer here, but apart from that, the nose is very similar. Big tobacco notes and cocoa. Dark fruity notes. Cigar boxes. Of course also the usual coastal notes, sweet peat and antiseptic. Some graphite. This one leaves a slightly sharper impression than the Liquid Sun bottling. A little mint maybe. Mouth: quite dry, with big peat, some walnuts and hints of olives. Pepper and lemon zest. Big smoke. Seaweed. Certainly less fruity, which makes it less unique (but perhaps more classically Laphroaig). Liquorice. A little ginger. Finish: long, dry and leafy, with salty and bitter touches.</p>
<p>From the nose I though this would be nearly identical to the Liquid Sun release, but on the palate it turns out less rounded and balanced, less sherried and more extreme. Not bad of course, but at this price? Around € 230 – now sold out. This year&#8217;s cask is still available but it will cost you over € 300, that&#8217;s just ridiculous. Thanks for the sample, Johannes.</p>
<p>Score: <strong><span style="color: #1f9bd8;">88</span><span style="color: #1f9bd8;">/100</span></strong></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.whiskynotes.be/2011/laphroaig/laphroaig-1989-dl-platinum/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Laphroaig 1991 (Liquid Sun)</title>
		<link>http://www.whiskynotes.be/2011/laphroaig/laphroaig-1991-liquid-sun/</link>
		<comments>http://www.whiskynotes.be/2011/laphroaig/laphroaig-1991-liquid-sun/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Jul 2011 22:29:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ruben</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Laphroaig]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[1991]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[20yo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[53.3%]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[islay]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[liquid sun]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sherry cask]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.whiskynotes.be/2011/laphroaig/laphroaig-1991-liquid-sun/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Laphroaig 20 yo 1991 (53,3%, Liquid Sun 2011, sherry hogshead, 279 btl.) - 90/100]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This <strong>Laphroaig 1991</strong> is part of the recent series by <a href="http://www.whiskynotes.be/tag/liquid-sun/">Liquid Sun</a>. It was matured in a sherry hogshead, which is always an eye-opener. The distillery itself never uses sherry wood to mature its normal production, but independent sherried Laphroaig can be really good.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<h1><img style="background-image: none; margin: 15px 50px 10px 10px; padding-left: 0px; padding-right: 0px; display: inline; float: left; padding-top: 0px; border-width: 0px;" title="Laphroaig 1991 Liquid Sun" src="http://www.whiskynotes.be/upload/Laphroaig-1991-Liquid-Sun_1374D/33db5353e139528d52c9ad8c8f53769c.jpg" alt="Laphroaig 1991 Liquid Sun" width="63" height="320" align="left" border="0" />Laphroaig 20 yo 1991 (53,3%, Liquid Sun 2011, sherry hogshead, 279 btl.)</h1>
<p>Nose: impressive notes of tar and smoked meats: cecina de Léon, grison, barbecued streaky (pork belly)… nicely mixed with muted medicinal notes and gouache paint. Coal smoke. Quite sweet as well, with tobacco and some dried fruits. Blackberry jam? Nice balance. Water brings the spices out. Mouth: again very smoky and ashy, with burnt toast and plenty of liquorice, a little pepper and salt. Then the sherry comes through, still showing sweet notes of ripe dark fruits (cassis especially) and chocolate. Nice tobacco notes and espresso. Finish: long, drier, smoky and a bit salty with a little coffee. And back to the smoked bacon.</p>
<p>As I said, sherried Laphroaig can be really good. This one has quite an excellent combination of deep smoke and dark fruits. Recommended. Too bad the rarity makes the price heavier than I hoped for&#8230; Around € 150.</p>
<p>Score: <strong><span style="color: #1f9bd8;">90</span><span style="color: #1f9bd8;">/100</span></strong></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.whiskynotes.be/2011/laphroaig/laphroaig-1991-liquid-sun/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Karuizawa 1991 (cask #3318)</title>
		<link>http://www.whiskynotes.be/2011/japan-whisky/karuizawa-1991-cask-3318/</link>
		<comments>http://www.whiskynotes.be/2011/japan-whisky/karuizawa-1991-cask-3318/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Jun 2011 04:12:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ruben</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[* Japan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[1991]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[62.5%]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Japan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[karuizawa]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sherry cask]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.whiskynotes.be/2011/japan-whisky/karuizawa-1991-cask-3318/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Karuizawa 1991 (62,5%, OB 2007, sherry cask #3318) - 86/100]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One of the youngest <strong>Karuizawa</strong> we’ve tried so far, a 1991 released in 2007. Back then, <strong>Number One Drinks</strong> had just started the import and the distillery was still building up recognition. This bottling won a silver medal in the 2008 Malt Maniacs awards.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<h1><img style="background-image: none; margin: 20px 10px 10px 60px; padding-left: 0px; padding-right: 0px; display: inline; float: right; padding-top: 0px; border: 0px;" title="Karuizawa 1991 cask 3318" src="http://www.whiskynotes.be/upload/Karuizawa-1991-cask-3318_B57F/m14822.jpg" border="0" alt="Karuizawa 1991 cask 3318" width="86" height="320" align="right" />Karuizawa 1991 (62,5%, OB 2007,<br />
sherry cask #3318)</h1>
<p>Nose: very strong and slightly rubbery. Volcanic ashes? At the same time, the hotness prevents other aromas to come out, it definitely needs some time to open up. Some sherry notes (of the earthy, mossy kind) and spices (pepper, ginger). Roasted nuts and baked pie. Blackberries and dried figs. Getting more floral over time. Mouth: hot, dry and sherried, with the original malt shining through after a few moments. Sweet coffee. Plums and dates. Very spicy, quite overwhelming. Slightly smoky and salty. Not much difference with water. Finish: long, hot and spicy.</p>
<p>An earthy / ashy expression of Karuizawa.<br />
Not a quick charmer, but it gains balance if you let it breathe. Around € 90 at the time, now sold out. Thanks for the sample swap, Johan.</p>
<p>Score: <strong><span style="color: #1f9bd8;">86</span><span style="color: #1f9bd8;">/100</span></strong></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.whiskynotes.be/2011/japan-whisky/karuizawa-1991-cask-3318/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Yamazaki 1996 (Whisky-Live)</title>
		<link>http://www.whiskynotes.be/2011/japan-whisky/yamazaki-1996-whisky-live/</link>
		<comments>http://www.whiskynotes.be/2011/japan-whisky/yamazaki-1996-whisky-live/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Jun 2011 12:16:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ruben</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[* Japan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[12yo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[1996]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[60%]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Japan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sherry cask]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[whisky live]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[yamazaki]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.whiskynotes.be/2011/japan-whisky/yamazaki-1996-whisky-live/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Yamazaki 12 yo 1996 (60%, OB for Whisky-Live Japan 2009, sherry butt AX70012) - 86/100]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This single cask of <strong>Yamazaki</strong> was selected by whisky writer <strong>Dave Broom</strong> to celebrate the 10th Anniversaries of Whisky Live held in Tokyo and London during February 2010. We’ve previously reviewed the <a href="http://www.whiskynotes.be/2010/japan-whisky/karuizawa-1990-whisky-live/">Karuizawa 1990</a> that was launched for the same occasion.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<h1><img style="background-image: none; margin: 0px 40px 10px 10px; padding-left: 0px; padding-right: 0px; display: inline; float: left; padding-top: 0px; border: 0px;" title="Yamazaki 1996 Whisky Live" src="http://www.whiskynotes.be/upload/Yamazaki-1996-Whisky-Live_D5C/JAPAN_YAM1996.jpg" border="0" alt="Yamazaki 1996 Whisky Live" width="90" height="320" align="left" />Yamazaki 12 yo 1996<br />
(60%, OB for Whisky-Live Japan 2009,<br />
sherry butt AX70012)</h1>
<p>Nose: deep sherry with fruity notes (sourish raspberry, red apples), nutty notes (walnuts) and oak resin. A little mint. Heavy sherry but faultless. Mouth: thick and compact. Starts dry and hugely oaky with dried fruits, walnuts and ginger. Evolves nicely on sweeter, creamy flavours like vanilla and chocolate ganache. Exotic woods. Pepper. Finish: smoky with great roasted coffee beans and milk chocolate.</p>
<p>Very big and packed with wonderful sherry notes. Not very complex though, and there are heavy wood flavours. Now sold for € 200 and more here in Europe, too much from a quality perspective.</p>
<p>Score: <strong><span style="color: #1f9bd8;">86</span><span style="color: #1f9bd8;">/100</span></strong></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.whiskynotes.be/2011/japan-whisky/yamazaki-1996-whisky-live/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Tamdhu 1990 (Malts of Scotland)</title>
		<link>http://www.whiskynotes.be/2011/tamdhu/tamdhu-1990-malts-of-scotland/</link>
		<comments>http://www.whiskynotes.be/2011/tamdhu/tamdhu-1990-malts-of-scotland/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 May 2011 08:04:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ruben</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Tamdhu]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[1990]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[20yo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[malts of scotland]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sherry cask]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Speyside]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.whiskynotes.be/2011/tamdhu/tamdhu-1990-malts-of-scotland/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Tamdhu 20 yo 1990 (49,8%, Malts of Scotland 2011, sherry butt #8119, 209 btl.) - 86/100]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Even tough we’re comparing a 1989 and 1990 <strong>Tamdhu</strong>, I think they might be sister casks. Earlier releases from casks #8113, #8126 and #8132 were also 1989 production so it doesn’t seem to be a chronological numbering.</p>
<p>This cask is part of the new <strong>Malts of Scotland</strong> releases.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<h1><img style="background-image: none; margin: 35px 40px 25px 0px; padding-left: 0px; padding-right: 0px; display: inline; float: left; padding-top: 0px; border: 0px;" title="Tamdhu 1990 - Malts of Scotland" src="http://www.whiskynotes.be/upload/Tamdhu-1990-Malts-of-Scotland_BCC2/2935_0.jpg" border="0" alt="Tamdhu 1990 - Malts of Scotland" width="156" height="293" align="left" />Tamdhu 20 yo 1990<br />
(49,8%, Malts of Scotland 2011,<br />
sherry butt #8119, 209 btl.)</h1>
<p>Nose: a profile that’s similar to the Tamdhu 1989 Liquid Treasures. Lots of rum &amp; raisins again. A little gunpowder and flints. More and darker chocolate, something of burnt sugar as well. It doesn’t have the slightly sour notes of balsamico. Dates. A few gamey notes. Roasted nuts. Mouth: sweet with smoky undertones. Raisins, prunes and dates. Roasted almonds. Big sherry. A nice dark chocolate bitterness. Then back to muscovado sweetness and light pepper. Some liquorice. Finish: long, marked by sherry and mocha with a nice dryness.</p>
<p>High power sherry. Very similar to the Liquid Treasures bottling, equally nice altogether, differences will come down to personal preferences. Around € 80.</p>
<p>Score: <strong><span style="color: #1f9bd8;">86</span><span style="color: #1f9bd8;">/100</span></strong></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.whiskynotes.be/2011/tamdhu/tamdhu-1990-malts-of-scotland/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Glen Grant 1959 (Whisky Club Austria)</title>
		<link>http://www.whiskynotes.be/2011/glen-grant/glen-grant-1959-whisky-club-austria/</link>
		<comments>http://www.whiskynotes.be/2011/glen-grant/glen-grant-1959-whisky-club-austria/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 May 2011 06:51:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ruben</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Glen Grant]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[1959]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[40yo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[48.9%]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[austria]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sherry cask]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.whiskynotes.be/2011/glen-grant/glen-grant-1959-whisky-club-austria/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Glen Grant 40 yo 1959 / 1999 (48,9%, Whisky Club of Austria 2007, sherry cask, 22 btl.) - 93/100]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This must be one of the rarest whiskies I’ve ever had. Just 22 bottles. It was presented at the recent <strong>Fulldram Supertasting</strong>. If you know this was voted third place (of five whiskies), you’ll understand that the line-up was very good. We’ll review a few others shortly.</p>
<p>This <strong>Glen Grant 1959</strong> was a leftover of a cask bottled in 1999 by Samaroli (at least that’s what I’ve heard). In 2007 the bottles were relabeled by the people of <strong>Whisky Club Austria</strong> (Konstantin Gregoriadis and others). The label says “designed by Serge Valentin”.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<h1><img style="background-image: none; margin: 0px 10px 10px 50px; padding-left: 0px; padding-right: 0px; display: inline; float: right; padding-top: 0px; border-width: 0px;" title="Glen Grant 1959 - Whisky Club Austria" src="http://www.whiskynotes.be/upload/Glen-Grant-1959-Whisky-Club-Austria_FC7C/10073586.jpg" alt="Glen Grant 1959 - Whisky Club Austria" width="64" height="320" align="right" border="0" />Glen Grant 40 yo 1959 / 1999 (48,9%, Whisky Club of Austria 2007, sherry cask, 22 btl.)</h1>
<p>Nose: almost everything you would expect from old dark sherry. Prunes, raisins, Portuguese Ginjinha, dark chocolate and roasted nuts. Balsamic syrup. All kinds of herbs. Something that holds the middle between fuel and dusty notes (bottle ageing?). High octane sherry without any possible off-notes. Mouth: very intense. Dried fruits but there are fresher notes as well (grapefruit, cherries, oranges). Some oak but never too dry. Nutty flavours again. Some pine resin. Mint. Finish: beautiful, long and very rewarding.</p>
<p>A very impressive and very intense Glen Grant. You need to be a sherry lover of course. No need to look for this bottle, I would say, although once there was a bottle on Whiskyauction.</p>
<p>Score: <strong><span style="color: #1f9bd8;">93</span><span style="color: #1f9bd8;">/100</span></strong></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.whiskynotes.be/2011/glen-grant/glen-grant-1959-whisky-club-austria/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Karuizawa 1991 Noh (cask #3206)</title>
		<link>http://www.whiskynotes.be/2011/japan-whisky/karuizawa-1991-noh-3206/</link>
		<comments>http://www.whiskynotes.be/2011/japan-whisky/karuizawa-1991-noh-3206/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 May 2011 03:22:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ruben</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[* Japan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[1991]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[19yo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[60.8%]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[karuizawa]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[noh]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sherry cask]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.whiskynotes.be/2011/japan-whisky/karuizawa-1991-noh-cask-3206/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Karuizawa 19 yo 1991 (60,8%, OB 1991, sherry butt #3206) - 86/100]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The new <strong>Karuizawa Noh</strong> releases were available at different stands at     <br /><a href="http://www.whiskynotes.be/2011/whisky-news/whisky-fair-limburg/">The Whisky Fair</a>. There’s a 19 years old <strong>Karuizawa 1991 cask #3206</strong> and a 13 years old <strong>Karuizawa 1997 cask #3312</strong>.</p>
<p>They decided to use small 20cl bottles, officially because the volume left in the cask was so small. That has nothing to do with exceptional angel’s share, it’s simply because Whisky Magazine bottled part of both casks in full 70cl bottles to support Oxfam.</p>
<p>&#160;</p>
<h1><img style="background-image: none; border-right-width: 0px; margin: 15px 50px 10px 20px; padding-left: 0px; padding-right: 0px; display: inline; float: left; border-top-width: 0px; border-bottom-width: 0px; border-left-width: 0px; padding-top: 0px" title="Karuizawa 1991 Noh 3206" border="0" alt="Karuizawa 1991 Noh 3206" align="left" src="http://www.whiskynotes.be/upload/Karuizawa-1991-Noh-cask-3206_CA31/2920_0.jpg" width="44" height="267" />Karuizawa 19 yo 1991     <br />(60,8%, OB 1991, sherry butt #3206)</h1>
<p>Nose: starts a bit dirty (something in between sulphury and farmy) but airing helps. Tobacco, matchsticks, hints of incense. A lot of pencil wood and limestone. There are some raisins and blood orange notes from the sherry, but on a second level. Ginger. Mouth: powerful with a big peppery kick. Rather sweet, with orange honey. Cigars, maybe even some smoke? Getting quite dry in the end, with an earthy umami flavour. Some vanilla as well. Finish: long, lots of pepper again. Tobacco. After a few hours, an empty glass smells like cured ham.</p>
<p>Big as Karuizawa can be, with the same elements as older versions but with a little less depth. The 1997 is slightly fruitier and less complex. Around € 60 for a 20cl bottle.</p>
<p>Score: <strong><span style="color: #1f9bd8">86</span><span style="color: #1f9bd8">/100</span></strong></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.whiskynotes.be/2011/japan-whisky/karuizawa-1991-noh-3206/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Ledaig 2001 (Whisky-Doris)</title>
		<link>http://www.whiskynotes.be/2011/ledaig/ledaig-2001-the-dram-whisky-doris/</link>
		<comments>http://www.whiskynotes.be/2011/ledaig/ledaig-2001-the-dram-whisky-doris/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 May 2011 04:06:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ruben</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Ledaig]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2001]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[50.5%]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[60.6%]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[9yo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[islands]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sherry cask]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[whisky-doris]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.whiskynotes.be/2011/ledaig/ledaig-2001-the-dram-whisky-doris/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Ledaig 9 yo 2001 (50,5%, Whisky-Doris 2011, sherry butt, 212 btl.) - 87/100]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Whisky-Doris</strong> released a cask of <strong>Ledaig 2001</strong> (peated Tobermory) and as they often do, there’s a high strength version (60,6%) and a low strength version (well low strength… 50,5%). According to Doris, it’s probably from a refill sherry butt.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<h1><img style="background-image: none; margin: 20px 10px 10px 50px; padding-left: 0px; padding-right: 0px; display: inline; float: right; padding-top: 0px; border-width: 0px;" title="Ledaig 9yo 2001 Whisky-Doris" src="http://www.whiskynotes.be/upload/Ledaig-2001-_A098/Ledaig9Dram.jpg" border="0" alt="Ledaig 9yo 2001 Whisky-Doris" width="67" height="320" align="right" />Ledaig 9 yo 2001 (50,5%, Whisky-Doris 2011, sherry butt, 212 btl.)</h1>
<p>Nose: big peat, exhaust fumes and smoked meat. Unique hints of pimentón (smoked paprika powder, commonly used in Spain to prepare Pulpo a la Gallega). Then big coastal notes (cod-liver oil, smoked fish, iodine) and hints of rubber boots. Quite farmy as well: wet earth, a little yeast. Underneath a nice layer of dried fruits and burnt sugar from the sherry. Fresh lemon and ginger. Some Mexican chocolate with spices. High complexity considering the age. Mouth: oily mouth-feel, with earthy peat but also a honey coating. Lemon. Coastal notes again. Tar. Less complex now, but very clean. Finish: very long, peaty and slightly chocolaty with a salty note.</p>
<p>A well-made peat bomb, with plenty of peat and coastalness but also quite rounded thanks to the sweeter sherry notes. This version costs € 42. The higher strength version is € 48.</p>
<p>Score: <strong><span style="color: #1f9bd8;">87</span><span style="color: #1f9bd8;">/100</span></strong></p>
<p><strong><span style="color: #1f9bd8;"> </span></strong></p>
<p><em>The 60,6% version starts more alcoholic and is slightly more closed. It takes more time to open up, but after a while they’re quite similar. I would suggest the 50,5% version as it has more than enough power and shows more of its flavours without the need to fiddle with water.</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.whiskynotes.be/2011/ledaig/ledaig-2001-the-dram-whisky-doris/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Ardbeg 1975 (DL OMC)</title>
		<link>http://www.whiskynotes.be/2011/ardbeg/ardbeg-1975-dl-omc/</link>
		<comments>http://www.whiskynotes.be/2011/ardbeg/ardbeg-1975-dl-omc/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Mar 2011 06:08:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ruben</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Ardbeg]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[1975]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[27yo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[50%]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[douglas laing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[islay]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[OMC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sherry cask]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.whiskynotes.be/2011/ardbeg/ardbeg-1975-dl-omc/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Ardbeg 27 yo 1975 (50%, Douglas Laing OMC 2002, sherry cask, US market, 342 btl.) - 92/100]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This dark-coloured <strong>Ardbeg </strong>was distilled in March 1975 and bottled in May 2002. It was distributed to the US market in the <a href="http://www.whiskynotes.be/tag/omc/">Old Malt Cask</a> series by Douglas Laing.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<h1><img style="background-image: none; margin: 50px 0px 10px 45px; padding-left: 0px; padding-right: 0px; display: inline; float: right; padding-top: 0px; border: 0px;" title="Ardbeg 1975/2002 DL OMC" src="http://www.whiskynotes.be/upload/Ardbeg-1975-DL-OMC_12E39/8121549.jpg" border="0" alt="Ardbeg 1975/2002 DL OMC" width="112" height="320" align="right" />Ardbeg 27 yo 1975 (50%, Douglas Laing OMC 2002, sherry cask, US market, 342 btl.)</h1>
<p>Nose: soot and sherry in a great marriage as both are not trying to overpower. Some of the notes, in no particular order: camphor, chocolate, gentle peat, iodine, sea breeze, red berries, juniper, tar, dark leather, dried prunes… All of a sudden, it reminded me of the famous <a href="http://www.dominiquepersoone.be/images/choco/cabarnet.jpg" target="_blank">Cabernet Sauvignon vinegar praline</a> invented by our Belgian shock-o-latier Dominique Persoone for Oud Sluis – it has the same chocolate smell combined with slightly sourish vinegar. Priceless. Mouth: big liquorice flavours now. Tar again, some tobacco as well. Nutmeg and pepper. Very intense. Earthy, ending on spices and pine needles. Finish: really long, rather oaky now. Pepper and liquorice.</p>
<p>An impressive Ardbeg, very intense. The tar is quite big but the chocolate sweetness from the sherry makes it special. Not unlike some heavily sherried Port Ellen actually (say <a href="http://www.whiskynotes.be/2010/port-ellen/port-ellen-pe1/">PE1</a>). Very hard to find now, and expect € 400 or more.</p>
<p>Score: <strong><span style="color: #1f9bd8;">92</span><span style="color: #1f9bd8;">/100</span></strong></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.whiskynotes.be/2011/ardbeg/ardbeg-1975-dl-omc/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Macallan Speymalt 1970 (cask #10031)</title>
		<link>http://www.whiskynotes.be/2011/macallan/macallan-speymalt-1970-10031/</link>
		<comments>http://www.whiskynotes.be/2011/macallan/macallan-speymalt-1970-10031/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Feb 2011 08:34:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ruben</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Macallan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[1970]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[39yo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[46%]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[G&M]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LMdW]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sherry cask]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Speyside]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.whiskynotes.be/2011/macallan/macallan-speymalt-1970-10031/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Macallan ‘Speymalt’ 1970 (46%, Gordon &#038; MacPhail for LMdW 2010, first fill sherry hogshead #10031) - 90/100]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img style="background-image: none; margin: 0px 0px 10px; padding-left: 0px; padding-right: 0px; display: inline; float: right; padding-top: 0px; border: 0px;" title="Gordon &amp; MacPhail" src="http://www.whiskynotes.be/upload/e761446a01b6_7C16/v207.jpg" border="0" alt="Gordon &amp; MacPhail" width="150" height="100" align="right" />After the Speymalt <a href="http://www.whiskynotes.be/2009/macallan/macallan-speymalt-1970-lmdw/">Macallan 1970 cask #8326</a> that won a 2009 Malt Maniacs Award, this sibling <strong>Macallan 1970 cask #10031</strong> won a Gold Medal as well at the <a href="http://www.whiskynotes.be/2010/whisky-news/malt-maniacs-awards-2011/">2010 MM Awards</a> (for Best Sherry cask).</p>
<p>A 39 years old Macallan bottled by <strong>Gordon &amp; MacPhail</strong> for La Maison du Whisky. Here we go!</p>
<p><br class="spacer_" /></p>
<h1><img style="background-image: none; margin: 0px 40px 10px 10px; padding-left: 0px; padding-right: 0px; display: inline; float: left; padding-top: 0px; border: 0px;" title="Macallan 1970/2010 cask 10031" src="http://www.whiskynotes.be/upload/e761446a01b6_7C16/m15864.jpg" border="0" alt="Macallan 1970/2010 cask 10031" width="76" height="320" align="left" />Macallan ‘Speymalt’ 1970 (46%, Gordon &amp; MacPhail for LMdW 2010, first fill sherry hogshead #10031)</h1>
<p>Nose: (old) Macallan + sherry = magical richness.  Apricot tartlets, prunes and dates. Some fresh red fruits. Mint, cinnamon and hints of sweet ginger. Some heather and fir-tree honey. Dusty books in the background – lovely. Mouth: vivid, with plenty of dry spices (cloves, cardamom). While initially rather rounded, it quickly becomes leathery and a lot oakier. Blackberry liqueur. Some resinous notes. Walnuts and liquorice. Roasted coffee. Very rich. Finish: medium length (only), with forest fruit, resin and spices.</p>
<p>In line with last year’s excellent cask although maybe a tad less sparkling. Not cheap, but acceptable for this age: around € 210. Now sold out.</p>
<p>Score: <strong><span style="color: #1f9bd8;">90</span><span style="color: #1f9bd8;">/100</span></strong></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.whiskynotes.be/2011/macallan/macallan-speymalt-1970-10031/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Highland Park Saint Magnus 1998</title>
		<link>http://www.whiskynotes.be/2011/highland-park/highland-park-saint-magnus-1998/</link>
		<comments>http://www.whiskynotes.be/2011/highland-park/highland-park-saint-magnus-1998/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Jan 2011 07:23:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ruben</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Highland Park]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[12yo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[1998]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[55%]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sherry cask]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.whiskynotes.be/?p=6651</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Highland Park 12 yo 1998 Saint Magnus (55%, OB 2010, 12.000 btl.) - 80/100]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong><img style="background-image: none; margin: 10px 30px 20px 0px; padding-left: 0px; padding-right: 0px; display: inline; float: left; padding-top: 0px; border: 0px;" title="Highland Park whisky" src="http://www.whiskynotes.be/upload/Highland-Park-Saint-Magnus_F3A0/HighlandPark180.jpg" alt="Highland Park whisky" width="90" height="99" align="left" border="0" />Saint Magnus</strong> is the second part of the <strong>Highland Park</strong> tribute to the Inga saga (the first release was called <strong>Earl Magnus</strong>). All of these releases are bottled in a hand-made brown bottle with a label design based on a 150 years old bottle of Highland Park.</p>
<p>Saint Magnus was matured mainly in Spanish sherry oak, of which 20% were first fill casks. It is bottled at 55%.</p>
<p>The third edition in this series, <strong>Highland Park Haakon</strong>, will be bottled as an 18 year-old. Expected in the second half of 2011.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<h1><img style="background-image: none; margin: 35px 0px 10px 40px; padding-left: 0px; padding-right: 0px; display: inline; float: right; padding-top: 0px; border-width: 0px;" title="Highland Park Saint Magnus 1998" src="http://www.whiskynotes.be/upload/Highland-Park-Saint-Magnus_F3A0/St_Magnus_Bottle_and_Box_lo_res.jpg" alt="Highland Park Saint Magnus 1998" width="130" height="320" align="right" border="0" />Highland Park 12 yo 1998 Saint Magnus (55%, OB 2010, 12.000 btl.)</h1>
<p>Nose: starts with a few unfresh smells, especially in comparison with yesterday&#8217;s <a href="http://www.whiskynotes.be/2011/highland-park/highland-park-1986-daily-dram/">1986 by Daily Dram</a>. Hints of rubber and meat. This is not uncommon for sherry releases, but I have troubles with it sometimes. After a while it fades and shows more classic dried fruits and honey lacquered meat (overall not very sweet though). A little yeast. Apples and cinnamon. Heather. Subtle peat. Some barbecue smoke, leather and plenty of spices. Mouth: very spicy (cinnamon, ginger, nutmeg) with toffee notes, apples and a hint of wax. A little pepper. Some bitter liquorice. In the end there’s something like burnt oranges and still some rubber. Finish: rather long, dry / bitter and sherried with peat smoke.</p>
<p>I had high hopes for this, but they&#8217;re not entirely fulfilled. It’s nicely coastal and relatively peaty but I&#8217;m more a fan of fresh, juicy (second fill?) sherry influence. Quite expensive as well: sold for € 100.</p>
<p>Score: <strong><span style="color: #1f9bd8;">80</span><span style="color: #1f9bd8;">/100</span></strong></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.whiskynotes.be/2011/highland-park/highland-park-saint-magnus-1998/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Talisker 1986 (G&amp;M Secret Stills 1.2)</title>
		<link>http://www.whiskynotes.be/2010/talisker/talisker-1986-gm-secret-stills-n1-2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.whiskynotes.be/2010/talisker/talisker-1986-gm-secret-stills-n1-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Dec 2010 10:59:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ruben</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Talisker]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[1986]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[21yo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[45%]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[G&M]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[secret stills]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sherry cask]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[skye]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.whiskynotes.be/?p=6356</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Talisker 21 yo 1986 (45%, G&#038;M Secret Stills 2007, cask #1361-1363, 1860 btl.) - 89/100]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As some distilleries don’t allow independent bottlers to mention their name, Gordon &amp; MacPhail invented the <strong>Secret Stills</strong> range. The ‘Isle of Skye’ clue gave it away though &#8211; the label doesn&#8217;t say Talisker but there&#8217;s only one distillery on Skye. This release was made up of three first fill sherry casks.</p>
<p><br class="spacer_" /></p>
<h1><img style="background-image: none; margin: 30px 0px 10px 40px; padding-left: 0px; padding-right: 0px; display: inline; float: right; padding-top: 0px; border: 0px;" title="Talisker 1986 - Secret Stills 1.2" src="http://www.whiskynotes.be/upload/3f9b08f13e8f_A3E1/talisker.jpg" border="0" alt="Talisker 1986 - Secret Stills 1.2" width="117" height="320" align="right" />Talisker 21 yo 1986 (45%, G&amp;M Secret Stills 2007, cask #1361-1363, 1860 btl.)</h1>
<p>Nose: starts in a lovely old-fashioned style, with wet dogs, some garage smells and peat smoke. Nice coastal notes as well: seaweed and soft iodine. Then it grows less austere, with creamy sherry notes, some oranges, vanilla and chocolate. Makes me think of much older Ardbeg in a way. Delicious. Mouth: a weakish, bittersweet attack with peat and Seville oranges. Some iodine again. Quite minty / herbal as well. Hints of liquorice and pepper. Finish: medium length, with smoke, herbal notes and liquorice.</p>
<p>A Talisker with a great balance between peat smoke and half-sweet sherry. Still available in some places. Around € 100 in the UK and € 140 in Europe. It beats me why certain lovely releases stay on the shelves for such a long time!</p>
<p>Score: <strong><span style="color: #1f9bd8;">89</span><span style="color: #1f9bd8;">/100</span></strong></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.whiskynotes.be/2010/talisker/talisker-1986-gm-secret-stills-n1-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

