<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>WhiskyNotes &#187; the nectar</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.whiskynotes.be/tag/the-nectar/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.whiskynotes.be</link>
	<description>Whisky blog and tasting notes</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 08:29:18 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Spirits in the Sky 2011</title>
		<link>http://www.whiskynotes.be/2011/whisky-news/spirits-in-the-sky-2011/</link>
		<comments>http://www.whiskynotes.be/2011/whisky-news/spirits-in-the-sky-2011/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Nov 2011 10:06:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ruben</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[* News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[festival]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[leuven]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Spirits in the Sky]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[the nectar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[whisky agency]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.whiskynotes.be/2011/whisky-news/spirits-in-the-sky-2011/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Spirits in the Sky 2011 report]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yesterday I went to Leuven for the <strong>Spirits in the Sky</strong> festival (5th edition if I’m not mistaken). It’s organised by our Belgian importer <strong>The Nectar</strong> so the brands in their portfolio (too many to sum up these days) are the main attraction. It’s a good place to find out about the new stuff that’s going to hit the shelves.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<h1><img style="background-image: none; margin: 0px 0px 10px 60px; padding-left: 0px; padding-right: 0px; display: inline; float: right; padding-top: 0px; border-width: 0px;" title="Cardhu 1984 Whisky Agency Funghi" src="http://www.whiskynotes.be/upload/Spirits-in-the-Sky-2011_82A9/TWA_bottle_clean.jpg" alt="Cardhu 1984 Whisky Agency Funghi" width="72" height="320" align="right" border="0" />Festival highlights</h1>
<p>Here are some of them most interesting new things I was able to try. Most of these will be reviewed in depth in the following weeks.</p>
<ul>
<li><span style="color: #666666;"><strong>Strathmill 1974</strong> (44,4%, Daily Dram)</span></li>
<li><span style="color: #666666;"><strong>Miyagikyo 1988</strong> for La Maison du Whisky</span></li>
<li><span style="color: #666666;"><strong>Bruichladdich 5yo vatting</strong> by Jim McEwan</span> <span style="color: #666666;">for The Nectar’s</span> 5th Anniversary, Château d’Yquem finish</li>
<li><span style="color: #666666;"><strong>Glenallachie 38yo 1973</strong> (44%, Malts of Scotland, bourbon cask #11018)</span></li>
<li><span style="color: #666666;"><strong>Glen Grant 1972</strong> (Whisky Agency “Private Stock”)</span></li>
<li><span style="color: #666666;"><strong>Cardhu 27yo 1984</strong> (52,6%, Whisky Agency)</span></li>
<li><span style="color: #666666;"><strong>Port Ellen 27yo 1983</strong> (55,5%, The Whiskyman)</span></li>
</ul>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p><span style="color: #63565f;"><img style="background-image: none; margin: 0px 50px 10px 0px; padding-left: 0px; padding-right: 0px; display: inline; float: left; padding-top: 0px; border-width: 0px;" title="Ardbeg 1974 / 1992 Cadenhead Anniversary" src="http://www.whiskynotes.be/upload/Spirits-in-the-Sky-2011_82A9/8071561.jpg" alt="Ardbeg 1974 / 1992 Cadenhead" width="67" height="320" align="left" border="0" /></span></p>
<p><span style="color: #63565f;">And two excellent oldies:</span></p>
<ul>
<li><span style="color: #666666;"><strong>- Talisker 1957</strong> (53,3%, G&amp;M Cask 1989)</span></li>
<li><span style="color: #666666;"><strong>- Ardbeg 18yo 1974</strong> (57,7%, Cadenhead’s Authentic Collection 1992, 150th Anniversary bottling)</span> <!--EndFragment--></li>
</ul>
<p>Of course there were also a few disappointments. Maybe not bad whisky, but expectations were higher than the actual result for the <strong>GlenDronach 21yo Parliament</strong> (clean but too sticky, too caramelly), the new <strong>Bruichladdich 10yo ‘The Laddie Ten’ </strong><del>and sadly also the new official Brora 32yo</del> (see comments).</p>
<p>I was told there would be one more official Brora after this, a Brora 40 years old. Let’s hope it will be outstanding and not priced with Taiwan in mind.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<h1>The Whisky Agency masterclass “not yet bottled”</h1>
<p><strong>Carsten Ehrlich</strong>, the driving force behind The Whisky Agency, brought five samples to the festival from casks that were yet to be bottled. We had a chance to try them (blind) and select our favourite which will be bottled as a special edition <strong>Whisky Agency &amp; Spirits in the Sky</strong> in the near future. Carsten doesn’t like to host tastings, so Mario Groteklaes had to take his place.</p>
<p><strong><img style="margin: 10px 0px 10px 40px; border: 0px currentColor; padding-top: 0px; padding-right: 0px; padding-left: 0px; display: inline; background-image: none;" title="Whisky Agency masterclass" src="http://www.whiskynotes.be/upload/Spirits-in-the-Sky-2011_82A9/IMAG0591.jpg" alt="Whisky Agency masterclass" width="231" height="268" align="right" border="0" /></strong>The first three samples were <strong>Bowmore 1999</strong> (focused on oily peat, not complex but good drinking whisky), <strong>Glen Scotia 1992</strong> (dirty sherry, old-style and definitely not my cup of tea) and a typical <strong>Glen Elgin 1984</strong> (similar to the <a href="http://www.whiskynotes.be/2010/glen-elgin/glen-elgin-1984-daily-dram/">Daily Dram</a> release of last year).</p>
<p>Then there was a terrific <strong>Glen Grant 1972</strong> (sherry hogshead) with a superb fruity / jammy nose (cherries, apricot pie, honeysuckle) and a fruity albeit slightly tannic profile in the mouth. Similar to the <a href="http://www.whiskynotes.be/2010/glen-grant/glen-grant-1972-whisky-fair/">Glen Grant 1972 bottled for The Whisky Fair 2009</a>.</p>
<p>This Glen Grant was chosen by our tasting committee, although a lot of people preferred sample number 5, a <strong>Tomatin 1976</strong>. We’ve had quite a lot of these and it’s easy to recognize the tropical fruits. High quality again (some said the best Tomatin 76 so far, especially on the palate) &#8211; a close second place.</p>
<p>Keep in mind that all five will be bottled at one time or another (some probably with Liquid Sun or Liquid Library labels). I know many people will look out for the Tomatin but personally I still think the Glen Grant was the best choice!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.whiskynotes.be/2011/whisky-news/spirits-in-the-sky-2011/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>18</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Bowmore 1994 (Signatory for The Nectar)</title>
		<link>http://www.whiskynotes.be/2011/bowmore/bowmore-1994-signatory-nectar/</link>
		<comments>http://www.whiskynotes.be/2011/bowmore/bowmore-1994-signatory-nectar/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Oct 2011 22:10:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ruben</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Bowmore]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[17yo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[1994]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[48.8%]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Belgium]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[islay]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[signatory vintage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[the nectar]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.whiskynotes.be/2011/bowmore/bowmore-1994-signatory-for-the-nectar/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Bowmore 17 yo 1994 (48,8%, Signatory Vintage for The Nectar Belgium 2011, hogshead #570, 227 btl.) - 82/100]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Like the often praised 1993 vintage, 1994 is not a common year for <strong>Bowmore</strong>. The distillery was being taken over by Suntory and worked on a lower regime at that time.</p>
<p>Sister casks #564, 565, 567, 568, 569, 571, 572, 573 (filled on the same day as this #570) have all been bottled in the <strong>Signatory</strong> Un-Chillfiltered Collection in 2010 and 2011, in twin cask releases. The cask for Belgium has been selected in 2 masterclasses hosted by Signatory’s <strong>Des McCagherty</strong> while he was in Belgium at the end of April 2011.</p>
<p>&#160;</p>
<h1><img style="background-image: none; border-right-width: 0px; margin: 20px 0px 10px 35px; padding-left: 0px; padding-right: 0px; display: inline; float: right; border-top-width: 0px; border-bottom-width: 0px; border-left-width: 0px; padding-top: 0px" title="Bowmore 1994 SV Nectar Belgium" border="0" alt="Bowmore 1994 SV Nectar Belgium" align="right" src="http://www.whiskynotes.be/upload/Bowmore-1994-Signatory-for-The-Nectar_97AD/Untitled-1.jpg" width="152" height="320" />Bowmore 17 yo 1994 (48,8%, Signatory Vintage for The Nectar Belgium 2011, hogshead #570, 227 btl.)</h1>
<p>Nose: clean and fresh but not very mature. There are coastal notes to be found (kippers, seashells), faint medicinal notes and pleasant&#160; fruits (lemon, apple, some green banana). Hints of eucalyptus and very nice tobacco. Medium peat and a little wet wool. Quite gentle and not extremely expressive, but I like it a lot. Mouth: again not extremely powerful. Starts sweet, slightly rooty and herbal with pepper and peat. Lots of coastal notes. Smoked tea. Lemon candy. Also flowery hints and some carbolic soap (bummer). Finish: long, salty (liquorice) and peaty with the bitterness of lemon zest.</p>
<p>Around € 70 while several UCF releases are still available for around € 40.</p>
<p>Score: <strong><span style="color: #1f9bd8">82</span><span style="color: #1f9bd8">/100</span></strong></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.whiskynotes.be/2011/bowmore/bowmore-1994-signatory-nectar/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>GlenDronach 1991 (cask #3181)</title>
		<link>http://www.whiskynotes.be/2011/glendronach/glendronach-1991-cask-3181/</link>
		<comments>http://www.whiskynotes.be/2011/glendronach/glendronach-1991-cask-3181/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Sep 2011 00:02:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ruben</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[GlenDronach]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[1991]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[19yo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[50.4%]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[highlands]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LMdW]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pedro ximenez]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[single cask]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[the nectar]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.whiskynotes.be/?p=9233</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[GlenDronach 19 yo 1991 (50,4%, OB 2011, Pedro Ximenez sherry puncheon #3181, 624 btl.) - 88/100]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This <strong>GlenDronach</strong> single cask is not part of the 4th batch. Half of it was bottled for <strong>The Nectar</strong> a couple of months ago. The rest went to <strong>La Maison du Whisky</strong>. The bottle says “PX sherry puncheon” while the GlenDronach website claims it was an oloroso butt.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<h1></h1>
<h1><img style="background-image: none; margin: 15px 40px 20px 10px; padding-left: 0px; padding-right: 0px; display: inline; float: left; padding-top: 0px; border: 0px;" title="GlenDronach 1991 cask 3181" src="http://www.whiskynotes.be/upload/GlenDronach-1991_13DDE/m16125.png" alt="GlenDronach 1991 - The Nectar / LMdW" width="75" height="320" align="left" border="0" />GlenDronach 19 yo 1991 (50,4%, OB for The Nectar &amp; LMdW 2011, Pedro Ximenez sherry puncheon #3181, 624 btl.)</h1>
<p>Nose: nice sherry, powerful and round. Dried fruits, some nutty notes. Very polished with some waxed furniture, similar to the great <a href="http://www.whiskynotes.be/2011/glendronach/glendronach-1992-cask-161/">GlenDronach 1992 cask #161</a> in that respect. Blackberry jam and figs, maybe even some black cherries. Sparkling top notes of orange liqueur and mint as well. Rum &amp; raisins. Plenty of good sherry associations. Mouth: rather oily, not really thick or powerful. Starts on dried fruits again, with some added herbal notes and polished oak. Plums. Cocoa. Not extremely complex, but very pleasant. Nice gingerbread and aniseed in the end. Finish: quite long, a little drier, with some tobacco now and some oak and spices.</p>
<p>This cask was a safe choice. It has a few nice touches (oak polish, gingerbread) while remaining within the “classic” profile everyone has come to expect from GlenDronach single casks. Around € 105.</p>
<p>Score: <strong><span style="color: #1f9bd8;">88</span><span style="color: #1f9bd8;">/100</span></strong></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.whiskynotes.be/2011/glendronach/glendronach-1991-cask-3181/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Imperial 1995 (SV for The Nectar)</title>
		<link>http://www.whiskynotes.be/2011/imperial/imperial-1995-signatory-nectar/</link>
		<comments>http://www.whiskynotes.be/2011/imperial/imperial-1995-signatory-nectar/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Sep 2011 00:13:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ruben</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Imperial]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[15yo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[1995]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[46%]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[signatory vintage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Speyside]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[the nectar]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.whiskynotes.be/2011/imperial/imperial-1995-sv-for-the-nectar/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Imperial 15 yo 1995 (46%, Signatory Vintage for The Nectar 2011, hogshead #50309, 281 btl.) - 85/100]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Among the summer releases from <strong>The Nectar</strong>, there are two new Daily Dram bottlings (Caperdonich 1994 and Glen Ord 1996). Earlier this summer there was a <strong>Bowmore 1994</strong> and this <strong>Imperial 1995</strong>, both bottled by <strong>Signatory Vintage</strong> for The Nectar. While this Imperial is only available in Belgium, a similar release (cask 50306 + 50307) has been widely available since March.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<h1></h1>
<h1><img style="background-image: none; margin: 0px 40px 10px 10px; padding-left: 0px; padding-right: 0px; display: inline; float: left; padding-top: 0px; border: 0px;" title="Imperial 1995 - Signatory for The Nectar" src="http://www.whiskynotes.be/upload/Imperial-1995-SV-for-The-Nectar_F9E9/2200000001332_xl.jpg" alt="Imperial 1995 - Signatory for The Nectar" width="101" height="320" align="left" border="0" />Imperial 15 yo 1995 (46%,<br />
Signatory Vintage for The Nectar 2011, hogshead #50309, 281 btl.)</h1>
<p>Nose: bright start, young in a good way. Juicy fruits (white peach, apples and pears, melon). Quite some barley notes (maybe a tad too grainy but that’s fine). A few sparkles of mint and citrusy sourness. Mouth: slightly oily attack, quickly getting hotter (pepper) and spicier (soft cinnamon). Nice fruity notes (melon, pear, citrus again) as well as vanilla sweetness. Simple but nice and clean. Finish: medium long, half sweet, half spicy.</p>
<p>Nothing spectacular but perfectly enjoyable. A bright young Speysider at an excellent price. Around € 45.</p>
<p>Score: <strong><span style="color: #1f9bd8;">85</span><span style="color: #1f9bd8;">/100</span></strong></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.whiskynotes.be/2011/imperial/imperial-1995-signatory-nectar/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Caol Ila 1979 (Whisky Agency &amp; The Nectar)</title>
		<link>http://www.whiskynotes.be/2011/caol-ila/caol-ila-1979-whisky-agency-nectar/</link>
		<comments>http://www.whiskynotes.be/2011/caol-ila/caol-ila-1979-whisky-agency-nectar/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Jul 2011 06:41:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ruben</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Caol Ila]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[1979]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[32yo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[52%]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[islay]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[the nectar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[whisky agency]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.whiskynotes.be/?p=8512</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Caol Ila 32 yo 1979 (52%, The Whisky Agency &#038; The Nectar 2011, bourbon hogshead, 242 btl.) - 90/100]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This <strong>Caol Ila 1979</strong> was part of the joint releases by <strong>The Whisky Agency</strong> and <strong>The Nectar</strong>. Presented at <a href="http://www.whiskynotes.be/2011/whisky-news/whisky-fair-limburg/">The Whisky Fair</a>, they are still available in most stores.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<h1><img style="background-image: none; margin: 0px 45px 10px 10px; padding-left: 0px; padding-right: 0px; display: inline; float: left; padding-top: 0px; border: 0px;" title="Caol Ila 1979 Whisky Agency &amp; The Nectar" src="http://www.whiskynotes.be/upload/Caol-Ila-1979-Whisky-Agency--The-Nectar_D5FA/TWA_bottle.jpg" alt="Caol Ila 1979 Whisky Agency &amp; The Nectar" width="76" height="320" align="left" border="0" />Caol Ila 32 yo 1979<br />
(52%, The Whisky Agency &amp; The Nectar 2011, bourbon hogshead, 242 btl.)</h1>
<p>Nose: beautifully fresh and warm at the same time. The freshness comes from maritime notes (seaweed, shells, mercurochrome) and eucalyptus, while warmer notes are added by yellow apples, soft buttercups and vanilla. The balance is perfect! Hints of limestone. Wax. Leather. And a soft veil of smoke. Mouth: dry, medicinal notes up front (bandages, iodine), with some camphor and kelp. Then a spicy / salty wave, herbal tea and liquorice. A little tar. Leather. Lemon and grapefruit zest. Finish: long, again balanced, softly briny with a coating lemon sweetness.</p>
<p>I would have loved a little more rounded sweetness on the palate, but nonetheless a delicious Caol Ila. Refined as always, very drinkable and extremely consistent.<br />
Around € 190.</p>
<p>Score: <strong><span style="color: #1f9bd8;">90</span><span style="color: #1f9bd8;">/100</span></strong></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.whiskynotes.be/2011/caol-ila/caol-ila-1979-whisky-agency-nectar/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Glenury Royal 1973 (TWA &amp; The Nectar)</title>
		<link>http://www.whiskynotes.be/2011/glenury-royal/glenury-royal-1973-twa-nectar/</link>
		<comments>http://www.whiskynotes.be/2011/glenury-royal/glenury-royal-1973-twa-nectar/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Jun 2011 06:01:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ruben</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Glenury Royal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[1973]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[37yo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[highlands]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[the nectar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[whisky agency]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.whiskynotes.be/2011/glenury-royal/glenury-royal-1973-whisky-agency/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Glenury Royal 37 yo 1973 (43%, The Whisky Agency &#038; The Nectar 2011, bourbon hogshead, 146 btl.) - 91/100]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>At the <a href="http://www.whiskynotes.be/2011/whisky-news/whisky-fair-limburg/">Limburg festival</a>, <strong>The Whisky Agency</strong> presented a whole line of joint bottlings with <strong>The Nectar</strong>, which is probably our biggest Belgian importer and the company behind the <strong>Daily Dram</strong> range.</p>
<p>There&#8217;s a Caol Ila 1979, Glenlossie 1975, Longmorn 1973, Tomatin 1966, Glen Keith 1970, Highland Park 1975 and this Glenury Royal 1975. All pretty great.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<h1><img style="background-image: none; margin: 0px 10px 10px 70px; padding-left: 0px; padding-right: 0px; display: inline; float: right; padding-top: 0px; border-width: 0px;" title="Glenury Royal 1973 - Whisky Agency" src="http://www.whiskynotes.be/upload/Glenury-Royal-1973-Whisky-Agency_9EA5/TWA_bottle.jpg" alt="Glenury Royal 1973 - Whisky Agency" width="76" height="320" align="right" border="0" />Glenury Royal 37 yo 1973 (43%,<br />
The Whisky Agency &amp; The Nectar 2011, bourbon hogshead, 146 btl.)</h1>
<p>Nose: honeyed nose with apple pie and caramelized sugar. Baked pear, raisins, apricots. Maybe a little papaya. Some nutty notes. Hay. Soft spices (cinnamon, mint). Nicely mellow and “antique” at the same time. Mouth: a bit too soft, but smooth and juicy, showing mainly oranges, both fresh and candied. Pears as well. Developing a spicy side (mint, clove, aniseed) and tobacco which makes it quite oriental. Honey. Some resinous oak and herbal tea. Faint paraffin notes. Finish: not too long, but nicely minty with a bit of drying oak.</p>
<p>Very good whisky, but quite expensive: around € 240 while last year’s Glenury Royal 1973 from the same bottler was only € 180.</p>
<p>Score: <strong><span style="color: #1f9bd8;">91</span><span style="color: #1f9bd8;">/100</span></strong></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.whiskynotes.be/2011/glenury-royal/glenury-royal-1973-twa-nectar/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Bowmore 1989 (Daily Dram)</title>
		<link>http://www.whiskynotes.be/2011/bowmore/bowmore-1989-daily-dram/</link>
		<comments>http://www.whiskynotes.be/2011/bowmore/bowmore-1989-daily-dram/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Jun 2011 05:47:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ruben</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Bowmore]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[1989]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[21yo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[48.1%]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[daily dram]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[islay]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[the nectar]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.whiskynotes.be/2011/bowmore/bowmore-1989-daily-dram/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Bowmore 21 yo 1989 (48,1%, Nectar of the Daily Drams 2011) - 82/100]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here’s another recent release by The Nectar of the Daily Drams.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<h1><img style="background-image: none; margin: 0px 50px 10px 10px; padding-left: 0px; padding-right: 0px; display: inline; float: left; padding-top: 0px; border-width: 0px;" title="Bowmore 1989 Daily Dram" src="http://www.whiskynotes.be/upload/Bowmore-1989-Daily-Dram_B34C/TWA_bottle.jpg" alt="Bowmore 1989 Daily Dram" width="76" height="320" align="left" border="0" />Bowmore 21 yo 1989 (48,1%,<br />
Nectar of the Daily Drams 2011)</h1>
<p>Nose: clean, with peat, seaweed and wet wool. Quite maritime. A little sharp in my opinion and a bit too narrow. Some grassy notes, brine, pepper and mint. A faint vanilla note but very much in the background. Water makes it slightly fragrant (luckily not too flowery though). Mouth: rather dry, very peaty, eartht, with secondary grassy notes and a little lemon. Again a faint vanilla note. Pleasantly salty. Faint hints of Schweppes tonic. Finish: medium long, in line with the palate.</p>
<p>This is not the horrible kind of early 1980’s Bowmore, but I don’t think it’s as good as many 1990’s vintages either. A lukewarm expression in my opinion, very focused but lacking some roundness in addition to the peat and brine. Around € 110.</p>
<p>Score: <strong><span style="color: #1f9bd8;">82</span><span style="color: #1f9bd8;">/100</span></strong></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.whiskynotes.be/2011/bowmore/bowmore-1989-daily-dram/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Longmorn 1975 (Daily Dram)</title>
		<link>http://www.whiskynotes.be/2011/longmorn/longmorn-1975-daily-dram-2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.whiskynotes.be/2011/longmorn/longmorn-1975-daily-dram-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 May 2011 03:18:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ruben</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Longmorn]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[1975]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[35yo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[50.5%]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[daily dram]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Speyside]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[the nectar]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.whiskynotes.be/2011/longmorn/longmorn-1975-daily-dram-2/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Longmorn 35 yo 1975 (50,8%, Nectar of the Daily Drams 2011) - 91/100]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Our next <strong>Longmorn 1975 </strong>in this little series. It was bottled by The Nectar of the Daily Drams (the Belgian series). It’s a follow-up for the <a href="http://www.whiskynotes.be/2011/longmorn/longmorn-1975-daily-dram/">Longmorn 1975 at 44% bottled in 2010</a> (lower strength but slightly darker) and it will be the last cask we’ll see in the near future.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<h1><img style="margin: 15px 40px 35px 10px; border: 0px currentColor; padding-top: 0px; padding-right: 0px; padding-left: 0px; display: inline; background-image: none;" title="Longmorn 1975 Daily Dram" src="http://www.whiskynotes.be/upload/Longmorn-1975-Daily-Dram_C5FA/Longmorn20Daily20Dram2035.jpg" alt="Longmorn 1975 Daily Dram" width="68" height="320" align="left" border="0" />Longmorn 35 yo 1975<br />
(50,8%, Nectar of the Daily Drams 2011)</h1>
<p>Nose: holds the middle between the <a href="http://www.whiskynotes.be/2011/longmorn/longmorn-1975-daily-dram-germany/">Daily Dram Germany</a> and the <a href="http://www.whiskynotes.be/2011/longmorn/longmorn-1975-whisky-faessle/">Whisky-Fässle</a> releases. Banana and papaya mixed with soft grassy notes, citrus and oak polish. More beehive notes and wax I would say. A slight nose prickle which seems to come more from the spices than from the alcohol. The same mint, nutmeg and soft pepper. Water makes it more citrusy in the style of the 1976 Longmorns. Mouth: very fruity (do I need to repeat the oranges, apricots and tangerines?) with a spicy kick. Honey and marmalade. On par with the Whisky-Fässle bottling, with added hints of aniseed and liquorice. Water seems to make it a little sweeter. A second wave of fruits in the aftertaste. Finish: long, spicy with lingering fruits.</p>
<p>This Longmorn is certainly up there and it has the advantage of being able to play around with water and bring out different elements. I still prefer the 44% bottling and it’s a little more expensive than the others: around € 200.</p>
<p>Score: <strong><span style="color: #1f9bd8;">91</span><span style="color: #1f9bd8;">/100</span></strong></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.whiskynotes.be/2011/longmorn/longmorn-1975-daily-dram-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Longmorn 1975 (Daily Dram Germany)</title>
		<link>http://www.whiskynotes.be/2011/longmorn/longmorn-1975-daily-dram-germany/</link>
		<comments>http://www.whiskynotes.be/2011/longmorn/longmorn-1975-daily-dram-germany/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 May 2011 03:58:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ruben</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Longmorn]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[1975]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[35yo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[40.5%]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[daily dram]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[germany]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Speyside]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[the nectar]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.whiskynotes.be/2011/longmorn/longmorn-1975-daily-dram-germany/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Longmorn 35 yo 1975 (40,5%, Nectar of the Daily Drams for Germany, bourbon hogshead) - 87/100]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It seems every bottler wants to have a mid-1970’s Longmorn these days (check <a href="http://www.whiskynotes.be/2011/longmorn/longmorn-1975-daily-dram/">this</a>, <a href="http://www.whiskynotes.be/2011/longmorn/longmorn-1976-malts-of-scotland/">this</a> and <a href="http://www.whiskynotes.be/2011/longmorn/longmorn-1976-whisky-agency-2/">this</a>). No suprise as some of them were really wonderful. Here’s one bottled by The Nectar of the Daily Drams, exclusively for Germany.</p>
<p>We’ll have it side-by-side with three other <strong>Longmorn 1975</strong> releases published in the next couple of days.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<h1><img style="background-image: none; margin: 0px 45px 10px 10px; padding-left: 0px; padding-right: 0px; display: inline; float: left; padding-top: 0px; border-width: 0px;" title="Longmorn 1975 Daily Dram for Germany" src="http://www.whiskynotes.be/upload/3e9d5c0ee48f_B985/TWA_bottle.jpg" border="0" alt="Longmorn 1975 Daily Dram for Germany" width="76" height="320" align="left" />Longmorn 35 yo 1975 (40,5%, Nectar of the Daily Drams for Germany, bourbon hogshead)</h1>
<p>Nose: sweet and fruity Longmorn, with honey, tangerine and apricots. Lots of papaya and ripe bananas. Spanish membrillo. Almond cookies. Very sweet and rounded, with hints of white chocolate and a little mint and pepper to add to the complexity. Mouth: a fair amount of oak which adds a sourness to the otherwise great fruitiness. Oranges, apricots, passion fruits…  Then showing some more oak juice, fruit tea and grapefruit. Finish: not too long, citrusy and minty with traces of fruit compote.</p>
<p>A great nose with a slightly oaky palate. I started with a big 92 score but the palate brought it down to 87. Still an interesting malt, no doubt. Available from <a href="http://www.dailydram.de/shpSR.php?A=158" target="_blank">eSpirits</a>, around € 180.</p>
<p>Score: <strong><span style="color: #1f9bd8;">87</span><span style="color: #1f9bd8;">/100</span></strong></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.whiskynotes.be/2011/longmorn/longmorn-1975-daily-dram-germany/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Caol Ila 1984 (cask #6266 for The Nectar)</title>
		<link>http://www.whiskynotes.be/2011/caol-ila/caol-ila-1984-6266-nectar/</link>
		<comments>http://www.whiskynotes.be/2011/caol-ila/caol-ila-1984-6266-nectar/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 May 2011 01:17:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ruben</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Caol Ila]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[1984]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[21yo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Belgium]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dewar rattray]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[islay]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[the nectar]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.whiskynotes.be/?p=7183</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Caol Ila 21 yo 1984 (58,5%, Dewar Rattray for The Nectar 2006, bourbon cask #6266, 251 btl.) - 91/100]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Another Coal Ila from <strong>Dewar Rattray</strong> (now <a href="http://www.whiskynotes.be/tag/dewar-rattray/">A.D. Rattray</a> to avoid confusion with the other Dewar) but from a long time ago. This <strong>Caol Ila 1984</strong> was bottled for <a href="http://www.whiskynotes.be/tag/the-nectar/">The Nectar</a>, their Belgian importer at that time.</p>
<p>When I started collecting whisky, this was a must-have bottle, certainly after it won a silver medal at the 2006 Malt Maniacs Awards.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<h1><img style="background-image: none; margin: 0px 35px 10px 0px; padding-left: 0px; padding-right: 0px; display: inline; float: left; padding-top: 0px; border: 0px;" title="Caol Ila 1984 (#6226 - The Nectar)" src="http://www.whiskynotes.be/upload/Caol-Ila-1984-Dewar-Rattray-for-The-Nect_8C53/7040250.jpg" border="0" alt="Caol Ila 1984 (#6226 - The Nectar)" width="105" height="307" align="left" />Caol Ila 21 yo 1984 (58,5%, Dewar Rattray<br />
for The Nectar 2006, bourbon cask #6266,<br />
251 btl.)</h1>
<p>Nose: moderately peaty with sweet lemon juice, candied zest and vanilla. Some dried hay and liquorice. Nice balance of pastry notes (butter cake) and drier hints of limestone, minerals and seafood. There’s a great farmy side to it as well, which grows stronger with a few drops of water. Quite rounded and gentle but very complex. Mouth: oily and mouth-coating. A much bigger peatiness now. Bread crust. Caramelized apples. Becomes drier and spicy in the end. Finish: very long, sweet with peat and coastal hints.</p>
<p>One of the best Caol Ila I’ve had. I feel lucky to have secured a bottle back then. Around € 110 but probably impossible to find now, except in auctions.</p>
<p>Score: <strong><span style="color: #1f9bd8;">91</span><span style="color: #1f9bd8;">/100</span></strong></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.whiskynotes.be/2011/caol-ila/caol-ila-1984-6266-nectar/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Ardmore 1992 (Daily Dram)</title>
		<link>http://www.whiskynotes.be/2011/ardmore/ardmore-1992-daily-dram/</link>
		<comments>http://www.whiskynotes.be/2011/ardmore/ardmore-1992-daily-dram/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Mar 2011 07:11:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ruben</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Ardmore]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[18yo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[1992]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[47%]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ardmore]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[daily dram]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[highlands]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LMdW]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[peat]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[the nectar]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.whiskynotes.be/2011/ardmore/ardmore-1992-daily-dram/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Ardmore 18 yo 1992 (47%, The Nectar of the Daily Drams 2010) - 87/100]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ardmore distillery was built in 1897 by the son of Adam Teacher and is still the key ingredient of the Teacher’s blend. About 60% of their production is peated (12-14 ppm).</p>
<p><img style="background-image: none; margin: 55px 10px 10px 50px; padding-left: 0px; padding-right: 0px; display: inline; float: right; padding-top: 0px; border-width: 0px;" title="Ardmore 1992 Daily Dram &amp; LMdW" src="http://www.whiskynotes.be/upload/Ardmore-1992-Nectar-of-the-Daily-Drams_E624/Untitled-1.jpg" alt="Ardmore 1992 Daily Dram &amp; LMdW" width="68" height="320" align="right" border="0" />This 18 years old <strong>Ardmore 1992</strong> was a joint bottling of <a href="http://www.whiskynotes.be/tag/daily-dram/">The Nectar of the Daily Drams</a> and <a href="http://www.whiskynotes.be/tag/lmdw/">La Maison du Whisky</a>.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<h1>Ardmore 18 yo 1992<br />
(47%, The Nectar of the Daily Drams 2010)</h1>
<p>Nose: a smoky nose with charcoal. Some apple / pear notes and ripe banana (maybe papaya even) but what sets it apart are the waxy / oily overtones (candle wax). Nicely integrated whiffs of oak and vanilla. Some heathery notes. A bit austere maybe, but I love the wax. Mouth: sweet and remarkably soft, with honeyed lemon juice, green apples, peach and sugared almonds. Some cereal notes. Earthy peat, still some waxy notes and a faint salty note. Finish: clean and long but not very intense, with a nice almond / banana combination, soft brine and lingering smoke.</p>
<p>This Ardmore shows a nice interplay of dry soot and sweeter fruity notes. The nose is the best part for me, as it looses some subtlety on the palate. Around € 70 (which means good value for money). Still available from LMdW – hard to find in other shops.</p>
<p>Score: <strong><span style="color: #1f9bd8;">87</span><span style="color: #1f9bd8;">/100</span></strong></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.whiskynotes.be/2011/ardmore/ardmore-1992-daily-dram/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Laphroaig 1990 (Daily Dram)</title>
		<link>http://www.whiskynotes.be/2011/laphroaig/laphroaig-1990-daily-dram/</link>
		<comments>http://www.whiskynotes.be/2011/laphroaig/laphroaig-1990-daily-dram/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Mar 2011 08:37:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ruben</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Laphroaig]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[1990]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[20yo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[52.8%]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[daily dram]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[islay]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[the nectar]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.whiskynotes.be/2011/laphroaig/laphroaig-1990-daily-dram/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Laphroaig 20 yo 1990 (52,8%, Daily Dram 2010) - 87/100]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img style="background-image: none; margin: 10px 0px 10px 30px; padding-left: 0px; padding-right: 0px; display: inline; float: right; padding-top: 0px; border: 0px;" title="Daily Dram" src="http://www.whiskynotes.be/upload/Laphroaig-1990-Daily-Dram_FFAA/Untitled-2.jpg" alt="Daily Dram" width="120" height="41" align="right" border="0" />Our final review of the new releases by <strong>The Nectar of the Daily Drams</strong>: a 20 years old <strong>Laphroaig 1990</strong>. I’m getting the feeling that the quality of this little series was very high!</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<h1><img style="margin: 35px 50px 40px 15px; border: 0px currentColor; padding-top: 0px; padding-right: 0px; padding-left: 0px; display: inline; background-image: none;" title="Laphroaig 1990 Daily Dram" src="http://www.whiskynotes.be/upload/Laphroaig-1990-Daily-Dram_FFAA/163aPic1B960380739_zz_laphroaig1990_big.jpg" alt="Laphroaig 1990 Daily Dram" width="68" height="307" align="left" border="0" />Laphroaig 20 yo 1990<br />
(52,8%, Nectar of the Daily Drams 2010)</h1>
<p>Nose: a fragrant Laphroaig with a nice peppery side (Szechuan) and a medicinal / herbal side (menthol, antiseptic). Faint fruity notes in the background, with sweet smoke and some farmy notes / wet dogs. I’m picking up notes of green tomatoes as well. With water the farminess grows stronger while it also turns to lemons. Nice – well balanced (read: not very peaty) on the nose. Mouth: slightly kippery, then growing more medicinal for a few moments but sweeter as well, with sugared lemon juice. After that, there&#8217;s a late burst of peat with some liquorice and pepper again (chilli). Finish: long, quite rounded with sweet smoke and soft hints of green peppers in the end.</p>
<p>Laphroaig of this age shows a little less peat on the nose, but still displays it with full power on the palate. I like the balance of this all-rounder. Limited availability. Around&nbsp;€&nbsp;125.</p>
<p>Score: <strong><span style="color: #1f9bd8;">87</span><span style="color: #1f9bd8;">/100</span></strong></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.whiskynotes.be/2011/laphroaig/laphroaig-1990-daily-dram/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Hanyu 1991 (Daily Dram)</title>
		<link>http://www.whiskynotes.be/2011/japan-whisky/hanyu-1991-daily-dram/</link>
		<comments>http://www.whiskynotes.be/2011/japan-whisky/hanyu-1991-daily-dram/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Feb 2011 09:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ruben</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[* Japan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[1991]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[19yo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[56%]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[daily dram]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hanyu]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Japan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[red oak]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[the nectar]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.whiskynotes.be/2011/japan-whisky/hanyu-1991-daily-dram/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hanyu 19 yo 1991 (56%, Nectar of the Daily Drams, cask #377, Red Oak heads) - 88/100]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is the second new release from <strong>Daily Dram</strong>, a Japanese <strong>Hanyu 1991</strong>. The label says “red oak heads” which means the top and bottom surfaces of the hogshead were made of <strong>red oak</strong>, a typical Northern American type.</p>
<p>It was probably a finish as red oak is very open-grained and prone to leaks, it simply can’t be used for 20 years. A sister cask #378 was bottled in the Ichiro’s Malt series last year.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<h1><img style="background-image: none; margin: 40px 10px 10px 45px; padding-left: 0px; padding-right: 0px; display: inline; float: right; padding-top: 0px; border: 0px;" title="Hanyu 1991 Daily Dram" src="http://www.whiskynotes.be/upload/Hanyu-1991-Daily-Dram_99BF/164aPic1B1887600461_zz_Hanyu1991_big.jpg" border="0" alt="Hanyu 1991 Daily Dram" width="81" height="320" align="right" />Hanyu 19 yo 1991 (56%, Nectar of the<br />
Daily Drams, cask #377, Red Oak heads)</h1>
<p>Nose: very spicy, a little oriental (cinnamon, ginger, mint). Big notes of cigar boxes. Some tangerine and cloves (hints of a high-end vermouth). Butterscotch and fruit cake. Pancake syrup. Nice hints of beeswax and leather. Mouth: powerful and pleasantly oaky with intense spices again. Pepper, some liquorice, a little ginger. Faint hints of aniseed. Sweet dried fruits as well (prunes to name just one) but overall quite savoury. A few smoky undertones. Finish: long but only the deeper spicy notes seem to stand out, most of the freshness disappears. Not too dry.</p>
<p>Hanyu traditionally shows a high oak influence with plenty of spices. This is no different, and I know for some people it will be “too Japanese”. Quite a hefty price as well: around € 180. The combination of its particular profile and price means this will probably be on the shelves a little longer.</p>
<p>Score: <strong><span style="color: #1f9bd8;">88</span><span style="color: #1f9bd8;">/100</span></strong></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.whiskynotes.be/2011/japan-whisky/hanyu-1991-daily-dram/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Tomatin 1976 (Daily Dram)</title>
		<link>http://www.whiskynotes.be/2011/tomatin/tomatin-1976-daily-dram/</link>
		<comments>http://www.whiskynotes.be/2011/tomatin/tomatin-1976-daily-dram/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Feb 2011 07:54:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ruben</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Tomatin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[1976]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[34yo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[51%]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[daily dram]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[highlands]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[the nectar]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.whiskynotes.be/2011/tomatin/tomatin-1976-daily-dram/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Tomatin 34 yo 1976 (51%, Nectar of the Daily Drams 2010, sherry butt) - 91/100]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>The Nectar of the Daily Drams</strong> has three new releases: a <strong>Laphroaig 1990</strong>, a Japanese <strong>Hanyu 1991</strong> and this <strong>Tomatin 1976 </strong>(a joint bottling with La Maison du Whisky in France).</p>
<p><strong>Tomatin </strong>had a very active period between 1975 and 1980 and was the largest distillery in Scotland at that time (more production than Glenfiddich today). With the recent revival and broadening of the range, the future of Tomatin looks good.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<h1><img style="background-image: none; margin: 0px 10px 10px 45px; padding-left: 0px; padding-right: 0px; display: inline; float: right; padding-top: 0px; border-width: 0px;" title="Tomatin 1976 Daily Dram" src="http://www.whiskynotes.be/upload/Tomatin-1976-Daily-Dram_1169C/_DSC2297.jpg" alt="Tomatin 1976 Daily Dram" width="74" height="333" align="right" border="0" />Tomatin 34 yo 1976 (51%, Nectar of the Daily Drams 2010, sherry butt)</h1>
<p>Nose: very smooth and feminine, with an intense fruit basket. Tangerines, white peach. Tropical fruits like guava and mango. Some apricot marmalade. Pink grapefruit. A hint of vanilla. Lots of honey. Lovely whiffs of mint as well. Fruity but not too sweet as it also shows a warm herbal side. Excellent. Mouth: starts spicy (a little pepper), which made me expect a fair amount of oak, but it doesn’t break through. After a few seconds it goes back to fruit candy, sweet grapefruit, vanilla, oranges, marmalade, a little banana&#8230; Then some fresh herbs and cinnamon. Finish: medium length, a tad more woody dryness but still very fruity and warm.</p>
<p>A Tomatin that’s well-aged while maintaining its juicy fruitiness. Recommended. Around € 145. Be quick if you want a bottle.</p>
<p>Score: <strong><span style="color: #1f9bd8;">91</span><span style="color: #1f9bd8;">/100</span></strong></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.whiskynotes.be/2011/tomatin/tomatin-1976-daily-dram/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>8</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Highland Park 1986 (Daily Dram)</title>
		<link>http://www.whiskynotes.be/2011/highland-park/highland-park-1986-daily-dram/</link>
		<comments>http://www.whiskynotes.be/2011/highland-park/highland-park-1986-daily-dram/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Jan 2011 07:40:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ruben</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Highland Park]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[1986]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[24yo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[51.8%]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[daily dram]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[the nectar]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.whiskynotes.be/?p=6652</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Highland Park 24 yo 1986 (51,8%, Nectar of the Daily Drams 2010) - 89/100]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This <strong>Highland Park 1986</strong> is one of the most recent releases by <a href="http://www.whiskynotes.be/tag/daily-dram/">The Nectar of the Daily Drams</a>. Independent bottlings of Highland Park can go in different directions, let’s see where this is going…</p>
<p>&#160;</p>
<h1><img style="margin: 40px 50px 30px 10px; display: inline; float: left" title="Highland Park 24yo 1986" alt="Highland Park 24yo 1986" align="left" src="http://www.whiskynotes.be/upload/201f1d71c9d9_7AF4/1591-0w0h0_Highland_Park_Highland_Park_1986_Ans_The_Nectar_The_Daily_Drams.jpg" width="67" height="300" />Highland Park 24 yo 1986    <br />(51,8%, Nectar of the Daily Drams 2010)</h1>
<p>Nose: mixed fruity notes and coastal elements. Not wham-bam candied fruit but a nice, elegant sweet layer of oranges and ripe apple. More fruits than usually found in this distillery. Nice eucalyptus and wax. Vanilla. On the other hand quite some dry flinty notes and a hint of chalk. Very good. Mouth: oily, mineral and slightly resinous. A hint of peat as well. Quite dry, the sweeter layer with vanilla is now in the background. Grapefruit. Develops on leafy / grassy notes with a hint of bitterness and liquorice. Still pretty coastal (oyster, lemon). Finish: medium length, with hints of herbal liqueur, dry resin and earthy notes.</p>
<p>A high quality dram with different elements: very fruity but also mineral, waxy, coastal elements… An nice all-round Highland Park. Very different from distillery releases though, so be careful if you&#8217;re only searching for that kind of profile. Around € 105. </p>
<p>Score: <strong><span style="color: #1f9bd8">89</span><span style="color: #1f9bd8">/100</span></strong></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.whiskynotes.be/2011/highland-park/highland-park-1986-daily-dram/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Longmorn 1975 (Daily Dram)</title>
		<link>http://www.whiskynotes.be/2011/longmorn/longmorn-1975-daily-dram/</link>
		<comments>http://www.whiskynotes.be/2011/longmorn/longmorn-1975-daily-dram/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Jan 2011 08:23:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ruben</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Longmorn]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[1975]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[35yo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[44%]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[daily dram]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Speyside]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[the nectar]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.whiskynotes.be/2011/longmorn/longmorn-1975-daily-dram/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Longmorn 35 yo 1975 (44%, Nectar of the Daily Drams 2010) - 92/100]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img style="background-image: none; margin: 0px 30px 0px 0px; padding-left: 0px; padding-right: 0px; display: inline; float: left; padding-top: 0px; border-width: 0px;" title="Daily Dram" src="http://www.whiskynotes.be/upload/71300b6591ce_ABC3/Untitled-2.jpg" border="0" alt="Daily Dram" width="140" height="48" align="left" />1975 may not be from the most common vintage for <strong>Longmorn</strong>, but we all know other vintages from the 1970’s can be great.</p>
<p><br class="spacer_" /></p>
<p><strong>The Nectar of the Daily Drams </strong>(formerly called Daily Dram &#8211; much easier) released this 35 year-old simultaneously with <a href="http://www.whiskynotes.be/tag/whisky-agency/">The Whisky Agency</a> who bottled a similar cask at 52,5%. Instinct tells me these casks are all from the 394x or 395x series that were also released by Whisky-Fässle (recently) and Three Rivers (some time ago).</p>
<p><br class="spacer_" /></p>
<h1><img style="background-image: none; margin: 15px 10px 15px 50px; padding-left: 0px; padding-right: 0px; display: inline; float: right; padding-top: 0px; border-width: 0px;" title="Longmorn 1975 Daily Dram" src="http://www.whiskynotes.be/upload/71300b6591ce_ABC3/Untitled-1.jpg" border="0" alt="Longmorn 1975 Daily Dram" width="68" height="320" align="right" />Longmorn 35 yo 1975  <br />
(44%, Nectar of the Daily Drams 2010)</h1>
<p>Nose: very elegant and rich. A big amount of peaches, tangerines and almond cookies. Hints of papaya and banana. Lots of honey notes. Lovely beeswax. Also quite some esters: shoe polish, even some hints of marshmallows (these notes fade after a while). Nougat. Subtle mint and spices. Altogether pretty brilliant and hugely attractive. Mouth: starts on wood and spice (soft pepper, nutmeg, some aniseed and mint) but quickly regains its fruitiness, mainly oranges. Less harmonious than on the nose, but punchy and entertaining. Fades on lovely tangerines and pink grapefruit. Finish: long, rather sweet, with citrus candy and honey. Drying in the end.</p>
<p>Great selection by Daily Dram. I would say this is anything but a daily dram though! I’ve also tried the Whisky Agency version (sadly not directly head-to-head) and I had a slight preference for this one. Around € 200 but it will be difficult to find as I was told it was very very limited.</p>
<p>Score: <strong><span style="color: #1f9bd8;">92</span><span style="color: #1f9bd8;">/100</span></strong></p>
<p><strong><span style="color: #1f9bd8;"> </span></strong></p>
<p><strong><span style="color: #1f9bd8;">ps/</span></strong> Yet another Longmorn 1975 cask will be bottled by <strong>Daily Dram.</strong> It will be the last cask of the series, this time with more bottles available. Keep your eyes open at the beginning of February. Other upcoming bottlings by Daily Dram: Tomatin 1976, Ardbeg 1998 and Laphroaig 1990.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.whiskynotes.be/2011/longmorn/longmorn-1975-daily-dram/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>New whisky releases: LMdW / Daily Dram / Whisky Agency</title>
		<link>http://www.whiskynotes.be/2010/whisky-news/new-releases-lmdw-daily-dram-whisky-agency/</link>
		<comments>http://www.whiskynotes.be/2010/whisky-news/new-releases-lmdw-daily-dram-whisky-agency/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Sep 2010 07:03:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ruben</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[* News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[daily dram]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LMdW]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[the nectar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[whisky agency]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.whiskynotes.be/2010/whisky-news/new-releases-lmdw-daily-dram-whisky-agency/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[New whisky releases: La Maison du Whisky / Daily Dram / Whisky Agency]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Before we move on with the <a href="http://www.whiskynotes.be/2010/whisky-news/benriach-single-casks-2010/">BenRiach single casks</a>, I’d like to draw your attention to a few other new releases. September / October tends to be an interesting period as bottlers present their new releases for the rest of the year. The festival season has started so there should be a chance to try them in the near future. Unless they are sold out by then…</p>
<p><br class="spacer_" /></p>
<p><img style="margin: 0px 0px 0px 40px; display: inline; border: 0px;" title="Whisky Agency Anatomy" src="http://www.whiskynotes.be/upload/NewreleasesLMdWDailyDramWhiskyAgency_7F84/Untitled1.jpg" border="0" alt="Whisky Agency Anatomy" width="169" height="194" align="right" /> <a href="http://www.whiskynotes.be/tag/whisky-agency/"><strong>The Whisky Agency</strong></a> has a new <strong>Anatomy</strong> series which features sketches of Leonardo on the labels. This is the line-up:</p>
<ul>
<li><strong>Inchgower 36 yo 1974</strong> ex-sherry<br />
(very citrusy with little sherry)</li>
<li><strong>Glenlossie 35 yo 1975</strong> ex-bourbon</li>
<li><strong>Lochside 29 yo 1981</strong> refill hogshead (quite a grainy nose and truckloads of citrus, mainly grapefruit)</li>
<li><strong>Bowmore 15 yo 1995</strong> ex-sherry</li>
</ul>
<p><span style="color: #63565f;"> </span><span style="color: #63565f;"> </span></p>
<p><span style="color: #63565f;">Reviews of the Bowmore and Glenlossie are coming up.<br />
On top of this, there are new additions to the <strong>Perfect Dram VI</strong> series:</span></p>
<ul>
<li><span style="color: #63565f;"><strong>Linkwood 36 yo 1973</strong> ex-bourbon</span></li>
<li><strong>“A Speyside” 41 yo 1969</strong> ex-bourbon (Glenfarclas?)</li>
<li><strong>Glen Moray 36 yo 1973</strong> ex-bourbon</li>
<li><strong>Glen Elgin 35 yo 1975</strong> ex-bourbon (review coming up)</li>
</ul>
<p>It’s interesting to see a lot of joint bottlings and similar casks, a concept that has become very popular lately (more exposure, or a cheap way to have more limited releases?). The Lochside and Bowmore bottled by TWA are also available from <strong><a href="http://www.whiskynotes.be/tag/daily-dram/">Daily Dram</a></strong> which means you can buy the same whisky in different bottles. Note that their Bowmore is bottled at 46% whereas TWA bottles at cask strength. Although both are releasing a Linkwood 1973, there is no mention of co-operation so it&#8217;s probably just a similar cask.</p>
<p><br class="spacer_" /></p>
<p><img style="margin: 15px 30px 40px 0px; display: inline; border: 0px;" title="Banff 1975 Daily Dram" src="http://www.whiskynotes.be/upload/NewreleasesLMdWDailyDramWhiskyAgency_7F84/47475_429556501381_821606381_4757711_7649896_n.jpg" border="0" alt="Banff 1975 Daily Dram" width="168" height="194" align="left" /> Daily Dram also shares a few casks with<br />
<a href="http://www.whiskynotes.be/tag/lmdw/"><strong>La Maison du Whisky</strong></a>:</p>
<ul>
<li><strong>Linkwood 36 yo 1973</strong></li>
<li><strong>Banff 34 yo 1975</strong></li>
<li><strong>Clynelish 27 yo 1982</strong></li>
</ul>
<p>I was able to try the last two recently (thanks Jeroen). The Banff is really good and highly recommended but the Clynelish didn’t seem to be on the same level as other Clynelish from the same year (this one was pretty sharp and mineral, I like them rounded with more vanilla). As far as I know, the LMdW versions are yet to be announced.</p>
<p><strong>Conclusion?</strong> A lot of new and promising (premium) expressions to choose from, many of them with a label of your choice!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.whiskynotes.be/2010/whisky-news/new-releases-lmdw-daily-dram-whisky-agency/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Ledaig 2001 (Nectar of the Daily Drams)</title>
		<link>http://www.whiskynotes.be/2010/ledaig/ledaig-2001-daily-dram/</link>
		<comments>http://www.whiskynotes.be/2010/ledaig/ledaig-2001-daily-dram/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Aug 2010 07:09:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ruben</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Ledaig]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2001]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[61%]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[8yo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[daily dram]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[islands]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mull]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[the nectar]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.whiskynotes.be/?p=5301</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Ledaig 8 yo 2001 (61%, The Nectar of the Daily Drams 2010) - 83/100]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Ledaig</strong> (pronounced Led-chick) is peated <strong>Tobermory</strong>, the only distillery on the Isle of Mull. The distillery has been closed more often than it was operational and production didn’t resume in a stable way until 1989. Half of their spirit output is unpeated, half is peated.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<h1><img style="margin: 0px 0px 10px 50px; display: inline; border-width: 0px;" title="Ledaig 2001/2010 - Daily Dram" src="http://www.whiskynotes.be/upload/Ledaig2001NectaroftheDailyDrams_D590/dailydram.jpg" alt="Ledaig 2001/2010 - Daily Dram" width="81" height="320" align="right" border="0" />Ledaig 8 yo 2001<br />
(61%, The Nectar of the Daily Drams 2010)</h1>
<p>Nose: leathery peat with hints of seawater and tarry boat rope. Quite oily with a sweet background. Candied lemon peel. A hint of toffee. When compared to peated Islay whisky, it’s probably closest to Ardbeg or Kilchoman. Very clean but fairly mono-dimensional. Water makes it slightly fresher and adds hints of lemon. Mouth: straightforward peat (much more than expected), quite sweet and rounded, with a nice lemon/salt combination. Peated margarita? More candied with a few drops of water &#8211; hints of sweet tobacco in the aftertaste. Finish: peat, peat, sweet peat.</p>
<p>Well-made with a big peat blast and a coating sweetness. Promising for the future of the distillery but nothing exceptional and still quite youngish in character. Too focused on peat for my taste &#8211; a slightly lighter alternative for Kilchoman fans maybe? Around € 40 and readily available in this part of Europe.</p>
<p>Score: <strong><span style="color: #1f9bd8;">83/100</span></strong></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.whiskynotes.be/2010/ledaig/ledaig-2001-daily-dram/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Glengoyne 1972 (Nectar of the Daily Drams)</title>
		<link>http://www.whiskynotes.be/2010/glengoyne/glengoyne-1972-daily-dram/</link>
		<comments>http://www.whiskynotes.be/2010/glengoyne/glengoyne-1972-daily-dram/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 May 2010 07:45:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ruben</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Glengoyne]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[1972]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[37yo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[52%]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[daily dram]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[highlands]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[the nectar]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.whiskynotes.be/2010/glengoyne/glengoyne-1972-nectar-of-the-daily-drams/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Glengoyne 37 yo 1972 (52%, Nectar of the Daily Drams 2010) - 91/100]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We’ve seen an unusual amount of independent <strong>Glengoyne 1972</strong> releases lately. It started with the <a href="http://www.whiskynotes.be/2009/glengoyne/glengoyne-1972-malts-of-scotland/">Glengoyne 1972 bottled by Malts of Scotland</a>, then a second bottling from the same cask, a bottling by Jack Wiebers, one by The Whisky Agency and now this Glengoyne 1972 by <a href="http://www.whiskynotes.be/2010/whisky-news/daily-dram/">The Bottler Formerly Known As Daily Dram</a>. There have been great <a href="http://www.whiskynotes.be/2009/glengoyne/glengoyne-1973-malts-of-scotland/">1973 Glengoynes</a> as well by the way.</p>
<p>It would have been interesting to have them all in a direct comparison, but for now it’s just this Daily Dram vs. the Malts of Scotland version.</p>
<h1>&#160;</h1>
<h1><img style="background-image: none; border-bottom: 0px; border-left: 0px; margin: 40px 10px 10px 45px; padding-left: 0px; padding-right: 0px; display: inline; float: right; border-top: 0px; border-right: 0px; padding-top: 0px" title="Glengoyne 1972 37y Daily Dram" border="0" alt="Glengoyne 1972 37y Daily Dram" align="right" src="http://www.whiskynotes.be/upload/Glengoyne-1972-Nectar-of-the-Daily-Drams_83B6/GGODDM1972.jpg" width="76" height="347" />Glengoyne 37 yo 1972     <br />(52%, Nectar of the Daily Drams 2010)</h1>
<p>Nose: very fruity with tangerine, lemon, pineapple and hints of strawberries. A bit of mint. Very tropical and honeyed. Obviously in line with the Malts of Scotland version, but maybe a tiny bit fruitier, with a higher degree of vanilla. Less oaky spices as well. I prefer this Daily Dram version for having a wider array of flavours, but it’s close. Mouth: an oily attack, fruity with a pleasant acidity. The pineapple and honey are supported by more spices (ginger and cloves) and hints of resinous oak, but less so than in the Malts of Scotland release. Very nice integration. Water brings out soft coconut and some dried prunes. Slightly grassy aftertaste. Finish: long, spicy and drier.</p>
<p>An admirable Glengoyne with a delicious fruitiness and well balanced oak influence. I have a slight preference for this one over the 1972 Malts of Scotland version, although the differences are small. The lower price makes it even more interesting: around € 145. Recommended.</p>
<p>Score: <strong><span style="color: #1f9bd8">91/100</span></strong></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.whiskynotes.be/2010/glengoyne/glengoyne-1972-daily-dram/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Longmorn 1996 (Nectar of the Daily Drams)</title>
		<link>http://www.whiskynotes.be/2010/longmorn/longmorn-1996-nectar-of-the-daily-drams/</link>
		<comments>http://www.whiskynotes.be/2010/longmorn/longmorn-1996-nectar-of-the-daily-drams/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 May 2010 09:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ruben</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Longmorn]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[13y]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[1996]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[49%]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[daily dram]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Speyside]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[the nectar]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.whiskynotes.be/2010/longmorn/longmorn-1996-nectar-of-the-daily-drams/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Longmorn 13 yo 1996 (49%, The Nectar of the Daily Drams 2010) - 84/100]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Longmorn</strong> is one of the twelve active <strong>Pernod Ricard</strong> distilleries and it has a strong reputation among blenders. Its revamped 16 yo had a bit of a false start in 2007 but recent batches are said to be much better.</p>
<h1> </h1>
<h1><img style="margin: 0px 45px 10px 0px; display: inline; border: 0px;" title="Longmorn 1996 Daily Dram" src="http://www.whiskynotes.be/upload/Longmorn1993NectaroftheDailyDrams_E8E0/Untitled2.jpg" border="0" alt="Longmorn 1996 Daily Dram" width="71" height="333" align="left" /> Longmorn 13 yo 1996 <br />
(49%, The Nectar of the Daily Drams 2010)</h1>
<p>Nose: a fresh youngster. A few hints of new spirit which disappear after a while. Lots of pears and apples. White fruits. Candied citrus. Gummy bears. Honeysuckle. Hints of almonds. Quite light and fruity. Mouth: very sweet attack. Pear drops. Flower honey. Slightly waxy. Interesting hints of peat smoke in the background, they add quite a lot of depth. Cocoa notes. Finish: oily texture, with nutty notes and subtle smoke.</p>
<p>An uncomplicated but perfectly nice summer dram, this Longmorn.  There’s a BBR bottling with similar specs for less than € 50 and a recent Signatory bottling for € 35 , so its price (around € 60) is perhaps the only thing speaking against it.</p>
<p>Score: <strong><span style="color: #1f9bd8;">84/100</span></strong></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.whiskynotes.be/2010/longmorn/longmorn-1996-nectar-of-the-daily-drams/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

