Single malt whisky - tasting notes

07 Feb 2012

Nikka Yoichi 20 years

Posted by: Ruben In: * Japan

Nikka Yoichi 20 years old has a great reputation, but this is mostly based on the 20yo vintage releases like the 1987/2007 which won the 2008 World Whiskies Awards. Even the WWA website is still mixing it up with the regular (non-vintage) 20 years old that we’re trying today. It’s the oldest member of the single malt Yoichi range.

 

Nikka Yoichi 20 yearsNikka Yoichi 20 yo
(52%, OB 2008, 22G10B)

Nose: big notes of cedar wood up front. Cigar boxes. Tobacco leaves. Old leather. Nice to see there’s also an estery note (nail polish) but this fades away quickly. Dark forest fruits remain. After that, some earthy smoke, burnt cake and a little tar. Hints of dried mushrooms and soft spices. Incense as well. Light matchstick notes from the sherry. Excellent complexity and typically Japanese. Mouth: punchy (bordering on pungent). Again quite savoury and leathery. Walnuts and roasted pecans. Deep, earthy peat smoke. Pepper, liquorice, anise, a pinch of salt. In the background a strong bitter-sweet harmony of burnt fruit cake and dark chocolate. Slightly sourish tobacco leaves. Finish: very long, smoky and chocolaty with traces of dry oak.

It’s a delicious and uniquely Japanese profile, but for some people it might be too extreme in its earthy savouriness. I love it though. Around € 230 for recent batches. Thanks Joeri!

Score: 91/100

Nikka Yoichi 20 years 4.5 Ruben Luyten 2012-02-07
  • bakerman

    Great stuff! I tried once and loved it!

    With this one I am particulary surprised how all the tasting notes vary (from better noses like mine). My sample definitely tastes strong “seaweedy”, spicy-woody and slightly smoky (peaty-woody if you want to make it short) while others seems more to focus on sherry , nutty and toffee notes (winey-woody).

    Curious if anybody has tried different batches and can confirm/ negate?

  • http://www.whiskynotes.be Ruben

    Indeed I noted the same thing. Some people think their dram was wrecked by sulphur while I couldn’t say it was bad in this respect. It could be due to batch variation but also due to its huge complexity – if there’s a lot to nose and taste, then we may simply focus on other things.

  • joeri

    You forgot to mention ‘honey’. A lot of honey :-)

    (And special thanks to Danny E for the bottle trade. I like this one too. A unique profile)

Categories

Calendar

May 2013
M T W T F S S
« Apr    
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031  

  • WhiskyNotes: Thanks Sjoerd. Not that I'm not interested, but it's Glenflagler mixed with other malts so I'm afraid it's not an option to tick it off my list. Thank
  • Sjoerd de Haan-Kramer: I might have a sample from the Glenflagler Pure Malt left. Mind, it is not the single malt (since that is about 17 times more expensive). You interest
  • WhiskyNotes: Thanks for your reply Selim. IMHO you don't pour a 1977 whisky into a Sauternes cask unless something was wrong with it already. So I'm not surprised

Coming up

  • Bowmore 1996 (TWA Faces)
  • Braeval 1994 (Liquid Library)
  • Laphroaig 2000 (Perfect Dram)
  • Glen Moray 1995 (Carn Mor)
  • Longrow Rundlets & Kinderkins
  • Glenfarclas Chairman's reserve 175
  • Balvenie Tun 1858 (batch 1)

1256 notes by Ruben

WhiskyNotes - Ruben LuytenThis blog is my personal collection of impressions, written while searching for the ultimate single malt whisky.