Single malt whisky - tasting notes

25 Aug 2009

Black Bull 30 Years old

Posted by: Ruben In: * Blends

Duncan Taylor recently launched a premium blend, Black Bull, made up of 50% malt whisky and 50% grain, vatted in the 1970’s and matured for more than 30 years. This is highly unusual because blends are usually vatted after separate maturation. Its availability is rather limited.

 

Black Bull 30y Black Bull 30 yo (50%, OB 2009)

Nose: nicely integrated oloroso sherry with figs, chocolate and orange marmalade. Lots of raisins. Some cocoa and espresso. Cake. Hints of leather. The whole works very well with the grain, it really balances. Mouth: nice mouth-feel, nice spices (cinnamon, ginger) which give it the flavours of a christmas cake. Hints of “Mon chérie” (chocolate filled with a cherry and liqueur). Finish: roasted coffee beans, milk chocolate ganache, cinnamon and cherries again. A bit of tobacco.

This certainly is a blend that will appeal to many malt lovers (give it to them blind). Very smooth and gentle. It’s probably the best blend I’ve ever had. Around € 90.

Score: 88/100

Black Bull 30 Years old 4 Ruben [WhiskyNotes] 2009-08-25">

8 Responses to "Black Bull 30 Years old"

1 | Jeff H.

August 25th, 2009 at 00:12

Avatar

This sounds really nice! Any sign of sulphur in this one?

2 | Ruben

August 25th, 2009 at 00:29

Avatar

Hi Jeff. Not a single trace of sulphur. The sherry influence is relatively mild and on par with the grains.

If you’re interested, there are only 600 bottles for the US.

3 | gal

August 25th, 2009 at 14:15

Avatar

90 Eur. is kinda of expensive for a blend, no matter how good. dont you think?
yet it’s intriguing.

4 | Jorgen

August 25th, 2009 at 20:42

Avatar

84 euro for a Hibiki 17 yr is in the same range…it’s also a blend, and in my opinion one of the best I ever tasted…

5 | Ruben

August 27th, 2009 at 00:13

Avatar

For me, it doesn’t matter if it’s a blend, new-make, grain, whatever… If it’s good, it’s worth some money. If it’s 30 years old, even more so.

This is way better than the Hibiki so you could argue the Black Bull is excellent value for money.

6 | Best in Blog #31: Tasting Notes and Whisky News on the Web | Whisky Party

August 27th, 2009 at 23:16

Avatar

[...] Notes reviews Black Bull 30 year old blend, and Craigellachie 1994 (Malts of Scotland).  Both get midling [...]

7 | Black Bull 40 Years old | WhiskyNotes

March 20th, 2010 at 00:01

Avatar

[...] Black Bull 30 Years old was a terrific blend. Now it has been surpassed by an older brother, Black Bull 40yo. It is made up of 90% malt whisky and 10% grain (a lot more malt than other blends). It contains whiskies from nine distilleries: Glenfarclas, Bunnahabhain, Glenlivet, Highland Park and Springbank among others. [...]

8 | Black Bull Special Reserve no.1 | WhiskyNotes

August 12th, 2011 at 05:34

Avatar

[...] is the brand of blended whiskies made by Duncan Taylor. So far they’ve done an excellent job with Black Bull 30yo and Black Bull 40yo but the younger 12yo has just won a IWSC award as [...]

Comment Form



Notifications


Categories

Calendar

February 2012
M T W T F S S
« Jan    
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
272829  

Coming up

  • Clynelish 1997 (Archives)
  • Glenrothes 1970 (Angel's Choice)
  • Nikka Yoichi 20 years
  • Bruichladdich 1992 Micro Provenance
  • Amrut Intermediate Sherry

Over 900 notes by Ruben

WhiskyNotes - Ruben LuytenThis blog is my personal collection of impressions, written while searching for the ultimate single malt whisky.