Single malt whisky - tasting notes

19 Jun 2011

The blogger’s blend (Master of Malt)

Tasting notes by Ruben Luyten - Posted in * Blends

Master of Malt - blogger's blendOnline retailer Master of Malt had a nice idea for creating a new whisky. They sent over a blending kit with samples of 10 different kinds of whiskies to ten whisky bloggers around the world. With these base whiskies they were asked to create a recipe for their ideal blend.

A couple of weeks ago, the blogger’s blends were available from Master of Malt for around € 35 (a set of 10x 3cl samples, but already sold out). We were supposed to judge them and vote for the best result. The winning blend will be released in full bottles.

A great idea, although I suggest to rethink their selection of bloggers next time… (just kidding)

By now I’ve tried all ten. It doesn’t make much sense to review them in depth, we wouldn’t know who to congratulate anyway. Therefore, I’ve used a three star ranking for nose and palate and not my usual scoring. The price mentioned will be the price of a full bottle, in case it wins the competition.

  • A – £ 48 (*****)
    N: fruit, spices, pleasant oak and subtle smoke
    T: spicy, round sweetness, vanilla
  • B – £ 36 (**)
    N: toast, raisins and slightly dirty sherry
    T: artificially sweet, toffee, dried fruits
  • C – £ 68 (***)
    N: grains, soft sherry, distant smoke
    T: spicy, fruity, faint ashes
  • D – £ 40 (****)
    N: dried fruits and caramel, faint smoke
    T: dried fruits, smoke, slightly harsh
  • E – £ 43 (***)
    N: citrus, nuts, honey and and grains
    T: neutral, grains, sweet
  • F – £ 37 (***)
    N: caramelized apples, honey, cinnamon
    T: lots of grains, toffee, artifically sweet
  • G – £ 40 (*)
    N: toffee, fruits, cereals, hay
    T: grassy, sharp grains, toffee
  • H – £ 52 (***)
    N: pastry sweetness, vanilla, toffee
    T: slightly shy, neutral, soft spices
  • I – £ 55 (*****)
    N: tar, sweet bacon and smoke
    T: peat, rather dry, Coal Ila-esk, pepper
  • J – £ 40 (**)
    N: toffee, dried fruits
    T: shy, soft chocolate, slightly chemical


I was surprised by the relatively small deviation. They’re pretty similar to other blends on the market and pretty similar to each other (only one of them has peat in the foreground for instance). The details that set them apart are fairly small, so I can imagine the sample comparison is pretty boring for inexperienced tasters. My girlfriend would probably say most of them are the same whisky. Because of this, I felt I had to exaggerate my scores a litte.

Also, it’s clear that the price isn’t always an indication of quality. The most expensive blend (C) comes out in the middle of the pack and some of the cheapest blends (especially D and F) are very well made. My favourites (A + I) are among the more expensive blends though.

For me, (A) stands out because of its punchy spices and fresh oak while maintaining a nice all-round character. And (I) stands out for nicely integrating peaty / smoky elements. (D) is the well-priced all-rounder (some sherry, some smoke) in my top-3.


Update: it turns out blend I won the contest. It comes as no surprise that the most typically Islay style won, but it has to be said it was a well-composed and enticing blend!

The blogger’s blend (Master of Malt) Ruben Luyten 2011-06-19
  • Joshua

    I think “I” was my number 2 favorite blend. Nice assessment, Ruben!

  • smsmmns

    I also went for I… unless we aren’t supposed to reveal that in which case I voted for K.

  • Ruben

    I was the obvious choice for peat lovers and for those who wanted something different. Eventually I voted A because it’s still a typical blend AND it’s very well made.

  • Kumar

    I am amazed by the idea for creating a new whisky.

  • Jeff H

    Nice post, Ruben! I hate myself for saying this, but I ended up voting for “I” as the top blend. I was determined going into this NOT to vote for “the peaty one.” :-)

    Dang it, though…it’s a great tasting blend, and the best in terms of hiding what seemed to be a pretty pedestrian grain base.

    Besides that one, I liked G and J more than you did, and wasn’t nearly as impressed with A. I totally agree with you on the others, though, and with your point about there being lots of similarities.


  • Ruben

    Thanks for your views, Jeff. Nice to see we agree on most things, and indeed, blend I was too good not to be chosen, even though it was a slightly obvious choice.
    I’d love to know who made the winning blend. It would be weird for the creator not to recognize it as it stands out so much.



November 2015
« Oct    

Coming up

  • Amrut 2009 (cask #2701)
  • Lagavulin 12 Years (2015)
  • Lindores 2015 festival bottling
  • Glenlivet 1981 (#9468 for TWE)
  • Talisker Distillers Edition (2015)
  • Laphroaig 32 Year Old
  • Glen Grant 65yo 1950 cask #2747 for Wealth Solutions
  • Mortlach 1959/1960 (G&M Royal Wedding)

1929 notes by Ruben

WhiskyNotes - Ruben LuytenThis blog is my personal collection of impressions, written while searching for the ultimate single malt whisky.