Single malt whisky - tasting notes

09 Jan 2012

Old Pulteney 12 Years

Tasting notes by Ruben Luyten - Posted in Old Pulteney

Old Pulteney 12yo – the benjamin of the range – is matured wholly in air-dried, hand-selected ex-bourbon casks. Contrary to the more upmarket / single cask Old Pulteney releases, this is still caramel coloured and chill-filtered.

This is the 2010 release – in 2011 the packaging had a slight makeover. The spirit is probably more or less the same (a new batch I guess).

 

Old Pulteney 12yoOld Pulteney 12 yo (40%, OB 2010)

Nose: quite a big maltiness coming out, with some coastal notes and a little brine. Rather big beefy elements as well, which I personally don’t like too much. Also a sharper, walnut-style note. It benefits from a bit of airing in the glass. Mouth:
a bit underpowered. Full of malt, slightly bitter Seville oranges, sourish apple. Liquorice. A dash of honey and quite a lot of caramel / toffee flavours in the end. Caramelized nuts. A bit too much of the caramel flavours for me. Finish: zesty and oily with a slightly herbal and salty ending. Drops dead all of a sudden.

This may not be a special dram, but let’s not forget we’re in the entry level market here. At this price point, it’s a decent introduction to this uniquely coastal distillery. Around € 30.

Score: 78/100

Old Pulteney 12 Years 2 Ruben Luyten 2012-01-09
  • aw

    Personally I found it a rather nasty introduction to the distillery. I didn’t touch OP for a long while after trying it. But as I gained more experience with single malts, I came to understand that there is often a world of difference between the entry-level 40% job, and the next-level-up 46%+ effort. Recently I tried the OP 17 and 21… and they’re great!

    It’s sad when the entry-level effort is pretty rubbish, and it puts people off the distillery. Or if it doesn’t put people off, then people may settle for the entry-level, unaware of how much better the slightly more expensive expressions are.

    I salute those distilleries like Ardbeg and Bruichladdich (the new ten!) whose entry level expressions are at 46%, NC2, and which are absolutely fab. No-one is ever left in any doubt as to the quality of those distilleries.

  • http://www.whiskynotes.be Ruben

    I would personally also save the money and go for OP 17, but I didn’t think it was really nasty.

  • Drini

    I’m a fan of this malt. I think it’s a very nice entry level whisky with a very interesting, lightly coastal, character. However, I do tend to think, that this is a malt that would improve a lot without caramel colouring and chill-filtration. I haven’t tried the older expressions yet, but I hope to do so in the near future.

Categories

Calendar

March 2015
M T W T F S S
« Feb    
 1
2345678
9101112131415
16171819202122
23242526272829
3031  

  • MARS: On this point I can only agree, even the badest karuizawa is higly wanted and really expensive. ;-) Personaly I have nothing against the fact that the
  • WhiskyNotes: I'm not counting new releases - the producer can basically ask any price you want regardless of the real value. That leaves us with a couple of 1972's
  • MARS: The last 35 years old cost 1400€, the 1972's rare malt are at 4000/5000€(minimum minimorum) at auction and the 1972/40 years old release of last y

Coming up

  • Mortlach 1995 'Stem Ginger Preserve' (Wemyss)
  • Dalmore Valour
  • Aberlour a'bunadh Batch #50
  • Glendronach 8yo (Whiskymanufaktur)
  • Yamazaki 12 Year Old
  • Tomatin 1997 (Liquid Library)

1751 notes by Ruben

WhiskyNotes - Ruben LuytenThis blog is my personal collection of impressions, written while searching for the ultimate single malt whisky.