Single malt whisky - tasting notes

28 Sep 2009

Bowmore Tempest

Posted by: Ruben In: Bowmore

Described as being “unlike any other Bowmore single malt”, the long-anticipated Bowmore Tempest is a small batch release of only 2000 cases from Islay’s oldest distillery.

It’s great that Bowmore doesn’t follow the trend to make big profits on limited (young) bottlings. This 10 year-old cask strength Tempest costs around € 45. Quite fair.

Bowmore Tempest 56.3% 

Bowmore 10yo Tempest
(56,3%, OB 2009, 12.000 btl.)

Nose: a fresh mix of orange marmalade and sea air. Nice and soft, citrus is the main component here. Then the floral notes appear, with hints of violets. Totally different than those soapy lavender Bowmores though. Strawberry candy! Sultanas. Some vanilla cream as well. Some maritime notes and ginger syrup. Mouth: citrus again, but the peat kicks in now. Nice evolution with rather big salty notes, oranges, a little sherry and a nice bitterness. Earthy smoke. Some pepper. Finish: medium length on salt, iodine and slightly bitter green tea.

I have not been a fan of recent official Bowmores, but the least you can say is that this is a nice surprise! The nose is very pleasant and this Tempest is a fresh, enjoyable dram overall. Very good value for money.

Score: 85/100

Bowmore Tempest 3.5 Ruben [WhiskyNotes] 2009-09-28">

13 Responses to "Bowmore Tempest"

1 | gal granov

September 28th, 2009 at 07:00

Avatar

Why is that so many islay fans do not
Like the bow?
I have only the NAS legend and it’s a fine dram
And very affordable

2 | Ruben

September 28th, 2009 at 10:18

Avatar

Bowmore Legend is not bad but it’s not great either. In fact, over the last 10 years Bowmore didn’t release many great (standard) malts in my humble opinion. I think of Dusk / Darkest / Dawn, the inconsistent Mariner and all the problems with lavender / soapy notes. They’ve started to regain quality with the recent branding makeover (new bottle shape + new batches), and independent Bowmores were always a bit better.

3 | gal

November 11th, 2009 at 12:04

Avatar

nice.
ruben, can u add “email me” when more people reply to the post add-on? i sometimes post and want to see other people/your replies, and your blog is missing this plugin. u run wordpress, so its easy. 10x
Gal

4 | gal

November 11th, 2009 at 12:38

Avatar

ah, excellent!
thanks Ruben and keep the reviews flowing.
we love it

5 | Malt Maniacs Awards | WhiskyNotes

December 1st, 2009 at 12:01

Avatar

[...] Fusion, Glengoyne 1973 by Malts of Scotland, Port Ellen PE1 (review coming soon) and Bowmore Tempest, Lochside 1981 for LMdW among (many many) others. The complete score card is here, the list of [...]

6 | aw

January 20th, 2010 at 08:49

Avatar

Wow! At last – a Bowmore that I really like (haven’t tried the older / expensive ones tho). This is impressive, juicy, fruity, mouth-watering stuff with some decent complexity.

With such flavour, at cask strength, non-chill-filtered, and an inexpensive price, there’s a lot to love. (It’s still “mit Farbstoff” though; guess they couldn’t bring themselves to bottle a pale-looking liquid. Pity.)

The only thing I didn’t get from this was peat. Bowmore is known for “medium peat”; I’d say this was “light”, going on “very light”. But maybe it’s me. I’ll try again and see what happens. I’d say that with a bit more peat, this would be absolutely wonderful. Maybe I’ll try mixing in some Ardbeg 10 and see what happens… certainly the citrus of Ardbeg is going to have no quarrel with this Bowmore.

Strongly recommended! Can’t wait to try it again.

7 | gal

January 20th, 2010 at 08:51

Avatar

Ah, just go this baby today! cant wait to open it this evening and try it.
will it be the killer bowmore?
at CS, i hope so.
will update :)

Gal.

8 | Bowmore 25 yo (Feis Ile 2010) | WhiskyNotes

July 8th, 2010 at 09:26

Avatar

[...] year at Feis Ile, Bowmore had a hand signed re-packaged version of the pleasant Bowmore Tempest, as well as a 25th Anniversary bottling. It was a 25 year-old at cask strength. Only 100 bottles [...]

9 | Marc

July 21st, 2010 at 11:47

Avatar

Is the new Bowmore Tempest Feis Ile 2010 release any different to the one you’ve reviewed above? Or is it just a new batch recreating the previous bottling? I won a bottle of the new one, and it says it is batch 1, is it then batch 1 of the 2010 release? Sometimes the distilleries aren’t clear enough on their labels IMO, particularly when us whisky-nerds want to know all the finer details.

10 | Ruben

July 21st, 2010 at 12:11

Avatar

From what I’ve heard, it’s still the same batch as the common release (i.e. the one reviewed above), only now in a fancy box with a signature of Eddie MacAffer. I agree that there have been mixed messages about this.

11 | Marc

July 21st, 2010 at 12:12

Avatar

Thanks Ruben. And the limited to 500 bottles? Does that mean that only 500 were repackaged and signed? If so, it is very misleading; one automatically thinks that limited to 500 would be a batch of whisky that only produced 500 bottles, not that only 500 out of 2000 cases were packaged differently. (Not sure what was repackaged either, bottle looks identical to your image above.)

12 | Ruben

July 21st, 2010 at 12:34

Avatar

You’re right: the bottle and tube are identical. The medal around the neck is new though! So much for its uniqueness…

13 | World Whiskies Awards 2011 | WhiskyNotes

March 6th, 2011 at 20:08

Avatar

[...] the subcategory winners (Best Speyside, Best Islay…) are Glenfarclas 40yo, Glenmorangie Signet, Bowmore Tempest, Redbreast [...]

Comment Form



Notifications


Categories

Calendar

February 2012
M T W T F S S
« Jan    
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
272829  

Coming up

  • Clynelish 1997 (Archives)
  • Glenrothes 1970 (Angel's Choice)
  • Nikka Yoichi 20 years
  • Bruichladdich 1992 Micro Provenance
  • Amrut Intermediate Sherry

Over 900 notes by Ruben

WhiskyNotes - Ruben LuytenThis blog is my personal collection of impressions, written while searching for the ultimate single malt whisky.