Single malt whisky - tasting notes

09 May 2009

GlenDronach 15yo Revival

Posted by: Ruben In: GlenDronach

Glendronach is not the best known distillery. It was mothballed in 1996, restarted in 2002, bought by Pernod Ricard in 2005 and put up for sale again in 2008. The distillery was bought by the owners of BenRiach, and we should spell GlenDronach now to make that clear (marketing dudes…).

The core range (12yo, 15yo and 18yo) was reworked and relaunched. Hence the name Revival for the 15 years old.

 

Untitled-1 GlenDronach 15y ‘Revival’
(46%, OB 2009)

Nose: There certainly are sulphur notes in this bottling. The first thing I get are mushrooms, a dirt bin and some rubber. Now this is personal, some people like it, others don’t. I have difficulties with it, but let’s move on. Very clear oloroso sherry influence as well: raisins, balsamico vinegar, coffee, mint… Slightly herbal. Subtle smoke as well. Mouth: good mouthfeel. The sherry continues with raisins, dark chocolate, figs, prunes and (slightly bitter) coffee notes. Still a bit dirty if you ask me. Finish: spicier on cloves. Quite long.

I suppose this is going to get a low score in next year’s Whisky Bible. I find it difficult to really appreciate it, although there is some lovely old-style sherry at work here. I can imagine some people adore this for its “off-road” character. Around € 50.

Score: 83/100

GlenDronach 15yo Revival 3 Ruben [WhiskyNotes] 2009-05-09">

19 Responses to "GlenDronach 15yo Revival"

1 | Johan

May 9th, 2009 at 18:23

Avatar

Ah, glad I’m not the only one that was set back by the sulfur

2 | Merse

May 16th, 2009 at 21:32

Avatar

I for one can’t wait to get my nose and mouth into a bottle of the new 15 and 18. Tasting for yourself is the only true way of knowing whether this dram is what you expect from “The GlenDronach” and it’s new owners Billy Walker and friends…

3 | Erik

June 11th, 2009 at 01:41

Avatar

Im surprised not to find your notes on the dirt in other reviews. Parhaps they leave it out not to scare people away? :)

This one is next on my list.

4 | Ruben

June 11th, 2009 at 01:58

Avatar

Whiskyfun describes it as mushrooms, horse stable, rancio… Whisky-distilleries.info says it starts on dominant yeast and mushrooms. I think we’re all talking about the same odours and it’s clear that it’s not 100% fresh sherry. As you may know, Serge doesn’t mind a bit of dirty notes, so lots of people won’t bother or won’t even notice. It is a fact that a segment of the population can’t detect sulphurous notes alltogether. I don’t think leaving it out would be an honest thing to do, although I don’t want to scare people away from trying this whisky themselves!

5 | Erik

June 11th, 2009 at 10:52

Avatar

Yes, iv heard stable and mushrooms before, but your note on dirt bin got me going.

How big is the suphur? Is it wrapped in something? Does it shadow other notes?

6 | Charlie

July 29th, 2009 at 07:26

Avatar

The finish was rather short to me and the aromas faded away quickly. Still, I consider it better than M’s 12 YO Sherry Oak.

It could be a good daily dram if the price can go down a little.

7 | MARS

March 12th, 2010 at 15:28

Avatar

I opened my bottle recently and I am more disapointed than what I remembered about previous tasting of this one. (still I didn’t like it a lot in previous tasting)

The sulphur is clearly present but it seems to almost disapear after some breething.(15/20 mintes)

My problem is clearly the mouth who is way too agressive and tannic (it destry my palate every time).

Now, I have to see after some month of bottle opening.
It may be interesting to taste it after 20 years of bottle ageing.

I definitively prefer the 18 years old and even the 12 new years old (a really good surpise this one)

MARS

8 | Gal

March 16th, 2010 at 16:07

Avatar

Ruben,
i just tasted and got some odd Vinegar notes on the nose.
see here : http://bit.ly/Glendronach15

do you think it’s the sherry influence?

9 | GlenDronach wood finishes | WhiskyNotes

June 9th, 2010 at 09:38

Avatar

[...] in the line-up yesterday were the regular GlenDronach 15yo and 18yo, and the recent GlenDronach [...]

10 | GlenDronach 1993 (cask #529) | WhiskyNotes

September 13th, 2010 at 09:45

Avatar

[...] struck me was rubber with hints of mushrooms and a sulphury note of fireworks. It’s similar to GlenDronach 15yo Revival in that respect, but less subtle. Also hints of walnuts and meat. On a second level there are hints [...]

11 | Whisky Kühn

February 2nd, 2011 at 18:24

Avatar

im wesentlichen ein excellenter Whisky mit den Noten von Pilzen, Anklang von Schwefel. Leichte beerige Töne mit Walnusscharakter. Die Sherrynote konnte brisanter, dominanter sein.

12 | Ricardo

May 16th, 2011 at 05:37

Avatar

Drank a half bottle this weekend with friends. No sulfur, rubber, mushrooms, vinegar or nastiness of any kind and I’m very sensitive to these qualities. We rated it a solid 88, quite lovely really.
I’m not questioning your take on this whisky. Could there be variations in the bottling with some being very good and others not so good? Makes me wonder!

13 | Ricardo

May 16th, 2011 at 05:40

Avatar

BTW: After reading this thread, I’m afraid to buy another bottle for fear I might get a bad one. 8^(

14 | Ruben

May 16th, 2011 at 08:04

Avatar

Yes there’s variation among the different batches. Read my comments about the 15yo Revival in this post one year later: http://www.whiskynotes.be/2010/glendronach/glendronach-wood-finishes/

I wouldn’t be afraid to buy another bottle. I wasn’t the only one with a similar reaction to the first batch, so they probably know to stay away too much old-style dirtiness.

15 | Ricardo

May 17th, 2011 at 00:29

Avatar

Ruben, thanks for response. Read your additional comments and duly noted. There has been a wide diversity of opinion on this spirit, even in reviews, so this may help to explain this.
Hopefully, any more bottles I purchase will be of the newer more pleasant profile which I find quite good!
As I mentioned in my previous comment, I generally dislike the dirty, sulfurous qualities.

16 | Ricardo

May 17th, 2011 at 00:30

Avatar

Ruben, perhaps another review is in order?

18 | con-yac

September 13th, 2011 at 15:59

Avatar

Severe batch variation.
One bottle: Delicious. Complex sherry paradise. Loved it.
Next bottle: Sherry buried alive under quantities of cauterizing smoke. Hated it.
What. A. Pity.

19 | MARS

October 13th, 2011 at 20:17

Avatar

Huge batch variation indeed.

But you can easily spot the one you like or dilike as the date of production is printed on the bottle!

Comment Form



Notifications


Categories

Calendar

February 2012
M T W T F S S
« Jan    
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
272829  

Coming up

  • Glenrothes 1970 (Angel's Choice)
  • Bruichladdich 1992 Micro Provenance
  • Ardmore 19yo 1992 (SMOS)
  • Yamazaki 1980 vintage
  • Amrut Intermediate Sherry
  • LMdW update

Over 900 notes by Ruben

WhiskyNotes - Ruben LuytenThis blog is my personal collection of impressions, written while searching for the ultimate single malt whisky.