Single malt whisky - tasting notes

22 Feb 2010

Springbank 18 years (2010)

Posted by: Ruben In: Springbank

Last year we saw the release of a new Springbank 18 years old. It was matured mainly in sherry casks and it was received very well by reviewers.

I was told it contained quite a lot of older whisky. In fact 21yo would have been a more accurate name. This year, there’s a new version limited at 9000 bottles with the same cask distribution (80% sherry, 20% bourbon). It’s likely to sell out really soon.

 

Springbank 18 yo Springbank 18y (46%, OB 2010)

Nose: it takes a while to open up, but it’s clear the berries are the key element again. Blueberries, strawberries… an unusual but very enjoyable fruit mix. Underneath is a darker layer of roasted grains, very gentle smoke and hints of marzipan and vanilla. A slightly earthy / dusty edge as well, which makes it a classic Springbank. While it’s still very balanced and entertaining, I remember last year’s release to be more expressive and complex. Mouth: same remark, it seems rather tame. Quite oily with the sherry standing out a bit (dried fruits, some spices, nuts). Slightly bittersweet. A hint of smoke. Finish: medium length but really nice, with notes of blueberries, chocolate and spices.

While it’s still a good whisky, I was underwhelmed by this new version. Maybe it’s the power of imagination (I didn’t have a chance to taste them head-to-head), but the new version seems to be playing in a lower league. Quite expensive: around € 100.

Score: 84/100

Springbank 18 years (2010) 3 Ruben [WhiskyNotes] 2010-02-22">

7 Responses to "Springbank 18 years (2010)"

1 | gal

February 22nd, 2010 at 07:59

Avatar

Ruben

I do have the 15 YO at home, and i dont quite like it enough. how would you rate this one compared to the 15?

2 | Charlie

February 22nd, 2010 at 09:53

Avatar

The older batch/version is still better, even for Springbank?

3 | Toon

February 22nd, 2010 at 09:54

Avatar

Hi Ruben,

I recently bought the Springbank vintage 1997 batch #2. I really like that one. Do you know how this 18 compares to the 1997 vintage?

Slainthe,
Toon

4 | Ruben

February 22nd, 2010 at 10:19

Avatar

It’s difficult to compare malts you didn’t try head-to-head. I’ve only tasted the 1997 vintage batch #1 and that was two years ago… In my memory the 1997 was less sweet (less fruity notes, no sherry) and smokier.

5 | james

February 22nd, 2010 at 10:47

Avatar

Ruben,

The previous release in the display box was actually not an 18y old Springbank, but it was more like 20 -21 y old.

6 | Johan

February 22nd, 2010 at 12:06

Avatar

I tasted both previous and new batch. To my likings the previous version is much better, way more complex. And indeed a lot of older whisky in it.

7 | Best in Blog #71: Amruts and Ardbegs | Whisky Party

February 27th, 2010 at 16:38

Avatar

[...] reviews from Whisky Notes: Springbank 18, Glen Grant 1974, and Glen Albyn 1974 [...]

Comment Form



Notifications


Categories

Calendar

February 2012
M T W T F S S
« Jan    
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
272829  

Coming up

  • Clynelish 1997 (Archives)
  • Glenrothes 1970 (Angel's Choice)
  • Nikka Yoichi 20 years
  • Bruichladdich 1992 Micro Provenance
  • Amrut Intermediate Sherry

Over 900 notes by Ruben

WhiskyNotes - Ruben LuytenThis blog is my personal collection of impressions, written while searching for the ultimate single malt whisky.