The Manager’s Dram series was selected by and bottled for distillery managers of the United Distillers group (now Diageo), but it came to an end when a lot of employees started selling their rare bottle to gain some extra income. I’ve already reviewed the Caol Ila 15yo Manager’s Dram in the past.
Last Monday I had a whisky tasting with the Fulldram club and this Glen Ord 16 Years ‘Manager’s Dram’ (distilled around 1975) was my favourite of the evening (and the group winner). Just to give you an idea: it defeated an Ardbeg 1973 and a Caperdonich 1972.
Ord 16 yo ‘Manager’s Dram’
(66,2%, OB 1991, refill cask)
Nose: starts fairly neutral, vaguely fruity, on sweet malt and pears. My first thoughts were ‘I really like this, but I can’t really tell why’. It opened up nicely, with polished leather, subtle pineapple cubes and Toblerone Fruit & Nut. A little heather honey and eucalyptus. Bergamot oil. Membrillo. Becomes much fruitier over time. Lots of subtleties eventually. Mouth: very drinkable at cask strength, with a burst of fruitiness (melon, oranges, apricots) and leather. Chocolate notes. A noticeable saltiness as well. Some herbal notes before turning back to fruits and toffee sweetness. Finish: maybe not the longest ever, but very nice.
A great surprise (well, not really). A benchmark bottling for Glen Ord, simple as that. The Whisky Exchange has it available for around € 500.
After the pleasant surprise that was the new Benromach 10 Year Old, I have to say I became interested to try other expressions. This entry-level Benromach Traditional was the first new bottling after the distillery was re-opened in 1998 after a 15-year break. Traditional is a mix of 80% bourbon casks and 20% sherry.
Nose: lighter and less characteristic than the 10. Surprisingly grainy and gristy. Dried grass, dusty books. The lightest touch of peat. Lemon oil. Some acacia honey in the background. Hints of green banana skin too. Mouth: sweet and malty, not very bold. Neutral sugared cereals, a bit of vanilla, caramel and liquorice root. Finish: not too long, malty, citrusy and lightly smoky.
This is not bad whisky, but it’s slightly bland and therefore a typical entry-level whisky. So far away from the uniqueness of Benromach 10 Year Old – I wouldn’t trade 10 bottles of Traditional for one Ten. Around € 30.
This limited edition Old Pulteney 1990 vintage says lightly peated on the label, but contrary to what you would expect, it’s not made from peated malt. Instead it was classic (unpeated) Old Pulteney spirit matured in ex-bourbon and ex-sherry casks that previously held heavily peated spirit.
Although the distillery is not giving further information about the provenance of the casks, I’m wondering how this relates to the Old Pulteney 1990 cask #5253 that I’ve tried (a cask bought from Laphroaig) and the Balblair 1990 cask #1463 (Balblair and Old Pulteney are part of the same group). Apparently both distilleries did the same experiment at the same time.
Old Pulteney 1990 ‘Lightly Peated’ (46%, OB 2014, Limited edition, 900 btl.)
Nose: not much peat so far, more like a gentle smokiness. Otherwise very malty and rather sweet, with apple, peardrops and honey. Sweet citrus. Also a leafy, slightly dusty side and a very hints of sour dough and pepper. Mouth: much more peat now. It seems to highlight Old Pulteney’s coastal, bitterish, oily Manzanilla-like character. Plenty of grapefruit zest. Underneath there are sweeter notes of honey and berry fruits. Finish: long, with a similar bitterness, some woody notes, coastal elements and light smokiness.
An interesting variation on the original Old Pulteney character. The leafy, coastal side pairs well with the gentle peat but seems to clash with the sweet fruitiness of the spirit. On par with the single cask version I tried before, although the harshness surprised me a little. A nice curiosum. Around € 150.
Irish Single Malt Whiskey 22 yo 1991 (46,6%, The Nectar of the Daily Drams & La Maison du Whisky 2014, rum cask #10657)
Nose: starts more waxy, much more rummy as well. The fruits are just as tropical, but maybe a tad greener and fresher. Green mango, white peaches. Clear herbal notes as well (especially mint, some thyme as well). Littlemillian grapefruits. On the nose, I prefer this one over its older brother. The rum seems to work better here. Mouth: similar to its older brother, maybe just a tad more muted although we’re splitting hairs. Mango, maracuja, pear, the whole fruit basket. Liquorice, a little dried coconut as well, fading towards a sweet grassiness. Nougat too. Finish: long, fruity, with citrus green tea.
Very good as well. I think the 1989 is certainly better on the palate, but the rummy notes work better for the 1991 in my opinion, especially on the nose. Score-wise very similar, but the 22yo is better value so I’d buy that one. Around € 140.
We’ll publish a small series of Irish whiskey if you don’t mind. There’s a sudden wave of (undisclosed) Irish single malt releases – a lot of them from the 1988-1991 period but also younger versions. We can’t be against that of course – most of them are attractive tropical fruit bombs.
Some suggest a link between these casks and the growing activities of the Teeling family. Also it’s becoming clear that a lot of them are probably Bushmills production.
That guess makes sense, especially for two new releases by The Nectar of the Daily Drams together with La Maison du Whisky. Why? Because they’re matured in rum casks, something that has only been done in Ireland by Bushmills as far as I know.
Irish Single Malt Whiskey 24 yo 1989 (42,2%, The Nectar of the Daily Drams & La Maison du Whisky 2014, rum cask #16262)
Nose: very creamy, with lots of vanilla crème. Banana, juicy pear, ripe mango and golden raisins. Faint hints of marshmallow and marzipan. Some buttery notes in the background, as well as a sharper note (white balsamic). Floral notes, pollen. Mouth: an explosion of tropical fruits, although I think the Irish Malt 1988 TWA beats it in terms of fruitiness. Mango, banana, maracuja. Some bramble. After a while, there’s a slight grassy sharpness as well as a fragrant hint of bergamot. Liquorice. Soft caramel. Hints of green tea. Finish: long, the oak is more clear now, there’s a soft pepperiness but also lingering fruits.
Good stuff. This one is particularly great on the palate. On the nose I have some difficulty with the sharper edges. Around € 190.
In the 1780’s, personal guests of John Jameson received a personal bottle at the end of their visit. This tradition lives on in the Jameson 12yo Distillery Reserve, which you can buy in the online shop, personalized with your own name.
It has been aged in bourbon and sherry casks for a minimum of 12 years and has a high pure Pot Still content. I’m not sure whether it’s different from the regular Jameson 12 Year Old.
Jameson 12 yo ‘Distillery reserve’ (40%, OB)
Nose: rich and fruity (melon, apricot, banana) sprinkled with honey. Almond paste. Vanilla. A subtle layer of wood (cedar?) and soft hints of dried fruits. Mouth: not a very brave attack, but nice flavours nonetheless. Tropical fruits, tangerine, banana, fruit gums. Nutty flavours from the sherry, as well as light spices, gentle grains and a little oak. Toffee notes and cinnamon. Finish: medium length, soft with sweet grapefruit and lingering spices.
Fresh, lively, attractive and balanced. Faultless Irish whiskey and better than the 12yo Special Reserve in my opinion, at least the batches I’ve tried. Available at the distillery shop or in the online shop for € 60.
Peter Thomson Ltd. was a whisky blender and wine merchant established in 1908 and known for its whisky mail ordering business in the 1920’s. They produced the Beneagles blend among others. In the 1960-1970’s they moved to wholesale before being acquired and merged in 1983. Eventually, through Charles Mackinlay, they became part of the White & Mackay group.
This bottle of The Glenlivet 7 Years Old was bottled by Peter Thomson, probably some time in the late 1960’s. It was a bottle that had been sitting in a Scottish restaurant before finding a new home in a famous Belgian cellar.
The Glenlivet 7 yo ‘Pure Malt’ (75° Proof, OB for Peter Thomson – Perth, 26,6 fl.oz.)
Nose: not extremely thick, but nicely aromatic and sherried. Oranges, apricots, surprisingly fresh and jammy even. Real sherry. Subtle OBE metallics. Hints of mint and waxed papers. Faint cedar in the background. Just great. Mouth: same feeling, not weak but not totally full-bodied either. Relatively sweet. Honey, blood oranges, a bit of almond cake and fruit skins. Toffee. Some Earl Grey tea. A little tobacco and touches of liquorice. Finish: medium long, a mix of fruity notes and cough syrup.
This one is totally not tired and it shows some nice old-skool whisky / old-bottle notes. A pleasure. Thank you for sharing, Eiling!
Another whisky matured in Port wood. This Ben Nevis 2002 was taken from warehouse n°2, where it matured (full-time) in a cask that previously held white port, which is quite rare for whisky.
Ben Nevis 10 yo 2002 (56,4%, OB 2013, Port pipe #334, 710 btl.)
Nose: pretty young spirit, with sweet apple juice, pine needles, and a bubblegum type of aroma. Some wet cardboard and hay. Lots of waxy notes, in between lipstick and lamp oil. In the background there’s a kind of sweet fruit syrup, orange squash, currants and marzipan. Some vanilla. Mouth: very fruity, honeyed start. Sweet whitecurrant jam, orange candy, maybe even pomegrenate? Underneath is some clear wood with plenty of spices (clove, ginger, pepper). Hints of tobacco and a slight floral bitterness. Finish: long, bittersweet. Cane sugar, honey and rose pepper.
Ben Nevis can be whacky – this one is. It’s an interesting experiment, not really comparable to other drams I can think of, but not something I would buy a full bottle of, especially at this price. From around € 160 in the UK up to € 230 from LMdW.